- While a growing health and wellness trend swept across most packaged food categories and negatively affected demand for sugary products, chocolate confectionery remained comparatively unscathed. Chocolate confectionery continued to be considered an indulgence and consumers purchased it out of enjoyment, which is why the two main players, Mondelez and Orkla, both stated that they have no intention of introducing any sugar-free chocolate products or using stevia as a sweetener in the foreseeable future. Both players instead claimed that flavour remained the most important factor and that they were unwilling to compromise on that. The two leading companies, however, catered to the health and wellness trend in one aspect, namely by offering different pack sizes. Norwegian consumers appreciated what they referred to as portion control, meaning that they tended to eat any chocolate purchased until it was finished. By offering different pack sizes, consumers were able to purchase the amount of chocolate they felt comfortable consuming. In addition, while the health and wellness trend was not particularly apparent in chocolate confectionery, the importance of sustainability, fair trade and sourcing became a key differencing factor. For example, Orkla and Nidar only purchased cacao with the UTZ Certified label. Similarly, Mondelez exclusively used Rainforest Alliance certified cocoa and introduced its own Cocoa Life programme in 2012, intended to improve the working and living conditions of cocoa farmers and to prevent child labour.
- The competitive landscape within chocolate confectionery remained highly consolidated in 2015, with two players accounting for a combined retail value sales share of 70%. Mondelez Norge, with its highly popular and well-known Freia brand, was the driving force for chocolate confectionery throughout the review period and accounted for a retail value sales share of 49% in 2015. The other driving force within chocolate confectionery was Orkla Confectionery & Snacks Norge, OLW. The company, which is a subsidiary of the Norwegian conglomerate Orkla Group, accounted for a retail value sales share of 21% in 2015. This was mainly attributable to the acquisition of the Norwegian confectionery specialist Nidar AS in 2013, as prior to that Orkla only accounted for a limited retail value sales share of 1%.
- In terms of company strategies that proved successful over the review period, and which are likely to continue to be adopted going forward, brand extensions saw rising popularity and generated significant exposure, as merging two well-known confectionery brands proved successful in generating significant novelty value. This strategy is likely to continue boosting sales over the forecast period. Manufacturers will also continue to emphasise new product development, particularly in terms of introducing new flavour ranges for existing brands.
- The main trend from 2014, namely negative media attention highlighting the damaging health effects of consuming gum, continued in 2015. The Consumer Council of Norway (Forbrukerrådet) conducted an examination of 68 gum variants in March 2014 for the possibly health-damaging, endocrine-disrupting chemical butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA). Over half of the gum variants examined, which included the majority of the leading brands, were proved to contain BHA, resulting in the Consumer Council advising against the consumption of these products. In particular, children, who tend to be more affected by endocrine-disrupting materials, as they have more sensitive hormone systems, were highly recommended not to consume any of the brands or variants containing BHA. The Consumer Council furthermore stated that hormone disrupters, such as BHA, can lead to decreased fertility, cancer and type two diabetes. Norwegian consumers exhibited an increased interest in food ingredients and quality over the review period, with negative findings from respected organisations tending to notably affect the packaged food in question. While the study conducted by Forbrukerrådet did not investigate to what extent the gum variants contained BHA, the findings that some products contained BHA were harmful enough to contribute to a declining volume development. Another study from Tel Aviv University, emphasised in the media, examined how teenagers suffering from migraine headaches were affected by abstaining from chewing gum. The study concluded that 26 out of the 30 teenagers included in the trial felt alleviating effects, whilst for 19 individuals the headache or pain disappeared completely when they stopped chewing gum on a regular basis.
- Wrigley Scandinavia, a subsidiary of the multinational Mars Inc, continued to dominate gum in Norway in 2015, accounting for a retail value sales share of 65%. The company’s share remained comparatively stable throughout the second part of the review period. The company's commanding position was attributable to high consumer loyalty for its sugar-free chewing gum brand Extra, which accounted for a retail value sales share of 59% in 2015. The company stated that the allegiance of Norwegian consumers to the Extra brand is unique. The company previously introduced competing brands, including Orbit and Airwaves, without success, as consumers tended to return to Extra. The best-selling variety, Extra White, was sold in bulk packaging, including a bottle with 60 pellet pieces, 10-pellet packs and 5-stick packs, in flavours such as eucalyptus, fruit, salty liquorice, spearmint, strong menthol and sweet mint. Extra divided it products into four segments: Extra (six flavours), Extra White (four flavours), Extra Professional (three flavours) and Extra Sticks (two flavours).
- Gum will continue to struggle over the forecast period, as a result of the unhealthy perception caused by the media in 2014, along with rising competition from substitute categories, mainly medicated confectionery. Nonetheless, consumers will continue to purchase gum, in order to maintain their oral health. Therefore, any notable decline in either retail volume or value sales is considered unlikely.
- Active marketing efforts and continuous new product launches remained critical success factors for players, and furthered retail value sales growth in sugar confectionery in Norway in 2015. Norwegians appreciated the opportunity to experience new products, which saw brand extensions, new flavour combinations, and variants of existing brands gaining popularity. Sugar confectionery remained somewhat of a two-faceted category, consisting of two separate segments, both important for the major players to target. On one side you had products acceptable for daily consumption, such as pastilles, mints and medicated confectionery, many of which were available in sugar-free varieties, and often incorporated other health and wellness attributes, such as soothing a sore throat or inhibiting a cough. This segment mainly competed with gum. The second segment was comprised of indulgence products, mainly suited for relaxing evenings at home, watching films or simply just as a tasty treat. This segment was predominantly sugarised and included such products as liquorice, chews and gums, toffee, caramels and boiled sweets. Here the competition was more diverse, coming from chocolate confectionery, sweet biscuits and, most importantly, sweet and savoury snacks.
- The competitive landscape within sugar confectionery remained comparatively consolidated in 2015, with the four leading players holding a combined retail value sales share of 68%. Cloetta Norge AS, a subsidiary of the Swedish company Cloetta, continued as the leading player in 2015, with a retail value sales share of 23%. The company’s position was predominantly attributable to its ongoing leadership of the two largest sugar confectionery categories, pastilles, gums, jellies and chews, and medicated confectionery. Cloetta Norge was established in 2012 following the acquisition of Leaf International by Cloetta. Leaf International had a well-established subsidiary in Norway called Leaf Norge, which successfully marketed strong brands, including the Läkerol and Malaco ranges. Cloetta Norge took over the marketing of both Leaf's and Cloetta’s brands, the latter of which were previously distributed by Galleberg. Cloetta Norge AS saw continued sound development in 2015, achieving retail value sales growth of 3% to marginally strengthen its retail value sales share.
- The overall trend within sugar confectionery is highly evident, with Norwegian consumers eating less unhealthy sugarised snacks. Total sugar consumption in Norway consistently decreased during the last decade, according to Helsedirektoratet (The Norwegian Directory of Health). Consumption decreased by 14.7kg or by 34% between 1999 and 2012, which, needless to say, was a remarkable decline. Sugar confectionery is often cited as the main, or one of the leading, sources of surplus sugar intake. The main struggle for manufacturers of sugar confectionery will be to battle its unhealthy image over the 2015-2020 forecast period, especially with respect to possible new regulations limiting the marketing of unhealthy food to children. Manufacturers are expected to make an effort to introduce healthier alternatives, not just within medicated confectionery and pastilles, but in the more indulgence-oriented categories. Norwegians will in no way stop consuming sugar confectionery, as it is considered a well-deserved indulgence, especially at the weekends, and its consumption is strongly cemented in Norwegian households. However, in order to not lose out on everyday consumption, which occurs to a lesser extent than weekend consumption, manufacturers will have to create a healthier image, in order to appeal to increasingly health-aware Norwegian consumers.
GET MORE FOR LESS!
For orders of 3 or more reports, in addition to your multi-purchase discount, we will provide any strategy or global briefing absolutely free.
Please contact a web site agent using the chat box or complete the form here to receive your free strategic briefing.
Samples (FAQs about samples):Sample Confectionery Market Research Report
Sample Confectionery Data
Delivery: Files are delivered directly into your account within a few minutes of purchase.
Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Confectionery industry in Norway with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.
Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.
If you're in the Confectionery industry in Norway, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.
The Confectionery in Norway market research report includes:
- Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
- Detailed segmentation of international and local products
- Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
- Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth
- Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country
Our market research reports answer questions such as:
- What is the market size of Confectionery in Norway?
- What are the major brands in Norway?
- With economic recovery far from guaranteed, are consumers cutting back on impulse and indulgence food items like confectionery?
- How are manufacturers addressing consumer concerns over health and obesity?
- What does the future hold for ethically sourced products?
Why buy this report?
- Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
- Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
- Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions
This industry report originates from Passport, our Packaged Food market research database.
Table of Contents
Confectionery in Norway - Category Analysis
- Table 1 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Volume 2010-2015
- Table 2 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Value 2010-2015
- Table 3 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
- Table 4 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
- Table 5 Sales of Chocolate Tablets by Type: % Value Breakdown 2010-2015
- Table 6 NBO Company Shares of Chocolate Confectionery: % Value 2011-2015
- Table 7 LBN Brand Shares of Chocolate Confectionery: % Value 2012-2015
- Table 8 Distribution of Chocolate Confectionery by Format: % Value 2010-2015
- Table 9 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Volume 2015-2020
- Table 10 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Value 2015-2020
- Table 11 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2015-2020
- Table 12 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2015-2020
- Summary 1 Other Chocolate Confectionery: Product Types
- Table 13 Sales of Gum by Category: Volume 2010-2015
- Table 14 Sales of Gum by Category: Value 2010-2015
- Table 15 Sales of Gum by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
- Table 16 Sales of Gum by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
- Table 17 Sales of Gum by Flavour: Rankings 2010-2015
- Table 18 NBO Company Shares of Gum: % Value 2011-2015
- Table 19 LBN Brand Shares of Gum: % Value 2012-2015
- Table 20 Distribution of Gum by Format: % Value 2010-2015
- Table 21 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: Volume 2015-2020
- Table 22 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: Value 2015-2020
- Table 23 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: % Volume Growth 2015-2020
- Table 24 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: % Value Growth 2015-2020
- Table 25 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Volume 2010-2015
- Table 26 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Value 2010-2015
- Table 27 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
- Table 28 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
- Table 29 Sales of Pastilles, Gums, Jellies and Chews by Type: % Value Breakdown 2010-2015
- Table 30 NBO Company Shares of Sugar Confectionery: % Value 2011-2015
- Table 31 LBN Brand Shares of Sugar Confectionery: % Value 2012-2015
- Table 32 Distribution of Sugar Confectionery by Format: % Value 2010-2015
- Table 33 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Volume 2015-2020
- Table 34 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Value 2015-2020
- Table 35 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2015-2020
- Table 36 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2015-2020
- Summary 2 Other Sugar Confectionery: Product Types
Confectionery in Norway - Company Profiles
Brynild Gruppen AS in Packaged Food (Norway)
- Summary 3 Brynild Gruppen AS: Key Facts
- Summary 4 Brynild Gruppen AS Operational Indicators
- Summary 5 Brynild Gruppen AS: Competitive Position 2015
Packaged Food in Norway - Industry Context
Stable development continues
Norwegian consumers turn their interest towards locally-sourced food
Domestic players govern packaged food
Grocery retailers dominate; internet retailing is yet to become mainstream
Health and wellness will continue to ensure high and stable development
KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Consumers and producers embrace locally produced food
The food wars
Health and wellness is the everlasting trend in packaged food
Food intolerance goes mainstream
FOODSERVICE: KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Trends: Sales to Foodservice
Trends: Consumer Foodservice
- Table 37 Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
- Table 38 Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
- Table 39 Forecast Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2015-2020
- Table 40 Forecast Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2015-2020
- Table 41 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
- Table 42 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
- Table 43 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
- Table 44 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
- Table 45 GBO Company Shares of Packaged Food: % Value 2011-2015
- Table 46 NBO Company Shares of Packaged Food: % Value 2011-2015
- Table 47 LBN Brand Shares of Packaged Food: % Value 2012-2015
- Table 48 Penetration of Private Label by Category: % Value 2010-2015
- Table 49 Distribution of Packaged Food by Format: % Value 2010-2015
- Table 50 Distribution of Packaged Food by Format and Category: % Value 2015
- Table 51 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2015-2020
- Table 52 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Value 2015-2020
- Table 53 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2015-2020
- Table 54 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Value Growth 2015-2020
- Summary 6 Research Sources