You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesConsumer Appliances
print my pages

Country Report

Consumer Appliances in the US

Apr 2011

Price: $2,400

About this Report

About this Report

Delivery method: instant download
Report format: PDF doc_pdf.png (download a sample)
Market statistics: Excel workbook doc_excel_table.png (download a sample)

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Consumer Appliances industry in USA with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Consumer Appliances industry in USA, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in USA for free:

The Consumer Appliances in USA market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Consumer Appliances in USA?
  • What are the major brands in USA?
  • How was category performance been affected by current economic climate?
  • How is penetration for consumer appliances going to develop over the medium term?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Consumer Appliances market research database.

Sample Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

“Cash for Appliances” programmes sell out in hours

The US government offered US$300 million in rebates for consumers who traded in their old appliances for newer, energy-efficient Energy Star certified models. Each state developed its own rebate plan, offered discounts at different times throughout the year, and required different criteria for receiving the rebate. Consumer interest in the programmes was so strong that some state programmes ran out of funds in mere hours. In Illinois, for instance, consumers lined up in advance of the start time on 16 April. The state rebate programme, which was anticipated to last 10 days, exhausted all US$6 million of its funds within 10 hours. Whilst other states saw a less enthusiastic response, the programme boosted sales of major appliances throughout the country.

“Smart” appliances begin to appear alongside a “smart” electricity grid

Electric utility companies began to invest in “smart” electric grids; a system of managing peak electrical loads more efficiently in an effort to reduce production capacity and costs. Manufacturers of major appliances sought to help consumers to take advantage of the smart grid by manufacturing appliances with special “smart” circuitry which can ascertain when energy use is at its peak, and therefore delay its function until composite energy use has fallen. Whirlpool Corp and General Electric Co both announced that 2015 was their target for including smart technology in all their appliances, although in order to meet this target, they will have to encourage utility companies to install smart electric meters throughout the country.

Appliances accommodate health trends

There were a number of ways in which manufacturers developed and improved products in order to meet the desire for a healthier lifestyle. Steam capability was incorporated into washers and dryers to better sanitise clothes, whilst vacuum cleaners were enhanced with ultraviolet light technology which kills bacteria and germs. Some cooking appliances can concurrently cook rice and steam fish with vegetables, and improved water filtration systems in refrigeration units provide cleaner water at a much lower cost than bottled water. Air purifiers which better clean the air were targeted towards the growing number of allergy sufferers.

Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs merge

In June 2010, Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs merged to become Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc, a company with combined net sales of US$2.6 billion. The deal makes Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc the third largest overall manufacturer of small appliances in the US. The new company now controls a strong brand portfolio which is well positioned to expand into potential growth markets internationally, whilst increasing its share further in the core US market.

Sales recovery is expected to be steady but slow over the forecast period

The US economy officially left recession in 2010, although unemployment remained near historic highs and consumer confidence and spending remained low. Whilst stimulus programmes and tax breaks helped to boost sales of appliances in 2010, consumers learned thrift and caution during the recession, and are unlikely to be free with their money in the near future. Thus, future sales will occur more slowly than the robust value sales of the early 2000sas the artificial stimulus of government programmes is replaced by an organic increase in consumer demand.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Consumer Appliances in the US - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

“Cash for Appliances” programmes sell out in hours

“Smart” appliances begin to appear alongside a “smart” electricity grid

Appliances accommodate health trends

Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs merge

Sales recovery is expected to be steady but slow over the forecast period

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Appliance purchasing incentives lead to a spike in sales

Energy-efficiency remains key: Introduction of “smart” appliances

Housing bust slows sales of major appliances

Television cooking shows drive the US cooking and food culture at home

Affordability of small appliances remains key, as prices edge up

Department stores and DIY and hardware retailers fight for share of sales

MARKET INDICATORS

  • Table 1 Household Penetration of Selected Total Stock Consumer Appliances by Category 2005-2010
  • Table 2 Replacement Cycles of Consumer Appliances by Category 2007-2010

MARKET DATA

  • Table 3 Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 4 Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 5 Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 6 Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 7 Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 8 Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 9 Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 10 Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 11 Sales of Small Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 12 Sales of Small Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 13 Sales of Small Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 14 Sales of Small Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 15 Company Shares of Major Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 16 Brand Shares of Major Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 17 Company Shares of Small Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 18 Brand Shares of Small Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 19 Major Appliances by Distribution Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 20 Small Appliances by Distribution Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 21 Forecast Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 22 Forecast Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 23 Forecast Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 24 Forecast Sales of Consumer Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 25 Forecast Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 26 Forecast Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 27 Forecast Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 28 Forecast Sales of Major Appliances by Category and by Built-in/Freestanding Split: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 29 Forecast Sales of Small Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 30 Forecast Sales of Small Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 31 Forecast Sales of Small Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 32 Forecast Sales of Small Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

DEFINITIONS

Category and subcategory definitions

Distribution definitions

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Consumer Appliances in the US - Company Profiles

Best Buy Co Inc in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

INTERNET STRATEGY

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRIVATE LABEL

  • Summary 4 Best Buy Co Inc: Private Label Portfolio

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 5 Best Buy Co Inc: Competitive Position 2010

Conair Corp in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 7 Conair Corp: Competitive Position 2010

Dyson Appliances Ltd in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 9 Dyson Appliances Ltd: Competitive Position 2010

Electrolux Home Products North America in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 12 Dyson Appliances Ltd: Competitive Position 2010

General Electric Co (GE) in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 15 General Electric Co: Competitive Position 2010

Home Depot Inc, The in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

INTERNET STRATEGY

COMPANY BACKGROUND

  • Chart 1 The Home Depot Inc: The Home Depot in Chicago, IL

PRIVATE LABEL

  • Summary 18 The Home Depot Inc: Private Label Portfolio

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 19 The Home Depot Inc: Competitive Position 2010

Jarden Corp in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 22 Jarden Corp: Competitive Position 2010

Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 25 Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc: Competitive Position 2010

Whirlpool Corp in Consumer Appliances (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 28 Whirlpool Corp: Competitive Position 2010

Air Treatment Products in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The key driver of sales of most air treatment products is the weather, making sales highly seasonal and highly regional, depending on weather patterns and changes from year-to-year. In 2010, the weather in much of the country was significantly hotter than average, and air treatment products – particularly cooling appliances – were extremely popular. Growth for the category as a whole was 5% in both volume and current value terms in 2010; a reversal of the declines seen in 2009, when the weather was milder.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The largest overall volume share in air treatment products was held by Jarden Corp, with a 16% share of retail volume sales in 2010. It was followed by Hunter Fan Co, with a 9% volume share, on the strength of its Hunter brand of ceiling fans and air purifiers. Hunter Fan Co continues to fight for share in the category with Kaz Inc, manufacturer of the popular Honeywell brand.

PROSPECTS

  • Forecasting for air treatment products can be difficult, as sales are directly linked to climatic conditions. At this time, retail volume growth is forecast to be slightly negative over the forecast period, with volume sales declining by 1% overall from 2010-2015.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 33 Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 34 Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 35 Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 36 Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 37 Company Shares of Air Treatment Products 2006-2010
  • Table 38 Brand Shares of Air Treatment Products 2007-2010
  • Table 39 Forecast Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 40 Forecast Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 41 Forecast Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 42 Forecast Sales of Air Treatment Products by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Dishwashers in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Many consumers are accustomed to hand washing dishes, and are therefore willing to forego the additional purchase of a dishwasher, causing sales of dishwashers to decline throughout the review period, except in 2010. These declines were particularly pronounced in 2008 and 2009, as the housing market stagnated and consumer credit dried up. However, 2010 saw a reversal of this trend, with volume and current value sales increasing for the first time since the start of the review period. This sales increase was primarily driven by government stimulus programmes such as “Cash for Appliances”, which offered a rebate for consumers who purchased new, energy-efficient appliances. As a result, household penetration increased to 60% in 2010. Whilst this is much lower than the household penetration rate for many other large appliances, it is nonetheless an increase from 2009, and shows the potential for the category, which had been missing for much of the review period.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Sears brand Kenmore increased to a 21% retail volume share in dishwashers in 2010, thanks in large part to the marketing efforts of the retailer. However, the competition remains fierce in the dishwashers category, with the top five brands accounting for 84% of all dishwasher sales in the US in 2010 in volume terms. Kenmore and GE were the only brands which managed to increase their shares in 2010, taking share from leading brands and relative newcomers alike.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, dishwashers is expected to see a CAGR of 2% in volume terms and a CAGR of 3% in constant value terms, as consumers begin replacing outdated or poorly functioning appliances with quiet, energy-efficient models. In addition, value sales will be driven by price increases, as manufacturers pass on increases in raw materials costs, especially for steel and other metals. As the housing market recovers, consumers are more likely to seek new appliances, which will likewise be a positive development in the category.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 43 Sales of Dishwashers by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 44 Sales of Dishwashers by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 45 Sales of Dishwashers by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 46 Sales of Dishwashers by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 47 Sales of Dishwashers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 48 Company Shares of Dishwashers 2006-2010
  • Table 49 Brand Shares of Dishwashers 2007-2010
  • Table 50 Forecast Sales of Dishwashers by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 51 Forecast Sales of Dishwashers by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 52 Forecast Sales of Dishwashers by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 53 Forecast Sales of Dishwashers by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Food Preparation Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Although the recession has officially ended, unemployment in America remains high, and many consumers continue to feel the pinch in their wallets. This limits the disposable income that many people are willing to spend on eating out at restaurants, as meals cooked at home can be prepared for much less. At the same time, many consumers wish to recreate the same meals they used to enjoy at full-service restaurants, and thus look for products which can enhance their culinary experience. They often turn to food preparation appliances to help them achieve these professional results, particularly since many food preparation appliances are relatively inexpensive. However, growth within the category was restrained in 2010, as the same tight budgets which kept consumers at home prevented them from splurging on the most premium or niche products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Hamilton Beach Brands remained the leading manufacturer of food preparation appliances in 2010, holding a 19% volume share. Russell Hobbs now controls a 16% volume share. Jarden’s share remained stable at 16%; Conair Corp, with an 11% share, were the only other company to achieve a double-digit volume share. The share of these leaders has slowly been declining. However, Whirlpool Corp and Conair Corp have been slowly but steadily gaining share, each gaining a full percentage point during the review period to reach 9% and 11% respectively in volume shares for 2010.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, sales of food preparation appliances are expected to increase as consumers begin spending again due to the end of the recession and increasing employment rates. Most categories of products are expected to see volume sales increase, with the exception of smoothie makers and other food preparation appliances, both of which are expected to experience declines following on from fad-influenced peaks. Overall, food preparation appliances is expected to see a volume CAGR of 1% and a constant value CAGR of 2% in the forecast period 2010-2015.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 54 Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 55 Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 56 Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 57 Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 58 Company Shares of Food Preparation Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 59 Brand Shares of Food Preparation Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 60 Forecast Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 61 Forecast Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 62 Forecast Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 63 Forecast Sales of Food Preparation Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Heating Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Heating appliances performed well in 2010, as consumers looked for ways to reduce their utility bills by heating only the parts of their homes which were in use. Heating appliances often provide an ideal solution, allowing consumers to control the heat room-by-room, rather than through a central thermostat which controls the temperature for the entire home. Although increases in utility costs generally slowed throughout the recession, many consumers worried about potential unemployment found themselves seeking ways to cut costs.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Jarden Corp accounted for a 19% share of heating appliances in volume terms in 2010, owing to its stranglehold on electric blankets and its recent acquisition of The Holmes Group, which is well-known in fan heaters and space heaters. Kaz Inc was next with a 10% share of volume sales, with its Honeywell brand enjoying wide distribution. The remainder of sales was scattered between a large number of competitors, with a significant percentage of volume sales coming from unbranded imports.

PROSPECTS

  • Similar to air treatment products, the prospects for heating appliances rest largely on external factors, such as weather conditions and the number of people impacted by cold winters. This makes future sales difficult to project. However, shifting climate patterns are likely to boost sales in areas which may not have seen significant cold weather on a regular basis, boosting sales. At the same time, the internal migration patterns of an ageing and retiring baby boomer generation are causing population growth amongst warmer southern states, causing a downwards impact on volume sales. Considering all these trends, volume and value sales are both expected to see a CAGR of 1% over the forecast period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 64 Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 65 Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 66 Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 67 Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 68 Company Shares of Heating Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 69 Brand Shares of Heating Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 70 Forecast Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 71 Forecast Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 72 Forecast Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 73 Forecast Sales of Heating Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Home Laundry Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • In 2010, the US government passed a stimulus measure aimed at boosting consumer spending. As part of this stimulus, the “Cash for Appliances” programme was implemented. “Cash for Appliances” provided funding to various states, which in turn implemented different rebate programmes for consumers who traded-in an old appliance for a new, energy-efficient model. These programmes were widely considered to be a great success, with funding in many states running out within hours of the start of the rebate period. Home laundry appliances benefited greatly from “Cash for Appliances”, with volume sales increasing by 3% for automatic tumble dryers, and by 1% for automatic washing machines. In both categories, this was a strong reversal of consistent volume sales declines since 2007.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Whirlpool Corp continued to be the dominant company within home laundry appliances, controlling a 40% volume share in 2010. Since Whirlpool acquired Maytag Corp in 2006, it has managed to effectively integrate operations, whilst maintaining strong brand identities for both brands. Whirlpool remained the second ranked brand with a 21% share of volume sales, whilst Maytag continued to hold third position with an 18% share. The top-selling brand in volume terms continued to be the Sears private label brand Kenmore, which held a 26% share of volume sales, a share which has been growing since 2008.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, home laundry appliances is expected to see a volume CAGR of 2% and a constant value CAGR of 4%. This growth will be largely thanks to an improving economic situation in America, along with more widely available credit. Until economic factors progress to the point at which consumers feel more confident in making purchases of large appliances, manufacturers will focus on providing design and feature innovations whilst improving the energy-efficiency of their home laundry appliance brands.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 74 Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 75 Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 76 Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 77 Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 78 Sales of Automatic Tumble Dryers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 79 Sales of Automatic Washing Machines by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 80 Company Shares of Home Laundry Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 81 Brand Shares of Home Laundry Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 82 Washing Machine Capacity - US
  • Table 83 Forecast Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 84 Forecast Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 85 Forecast Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 86 Forecast Sales of Home Laundry Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Irons in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Americans iron less than ever before. They feel that they are busier than they have ever been, and a greater number of households have multiple people in the workforce, limiting the time available for ironing. In addition, fabric technology has improved, and many clothes do not require ironing (or not as often). Even home laundry appliances are complicit in this trend, as many tumble dryers in the US now offer steam features which help to minimise creases and alleviate the need for additional clothing maintenance. With no moving parts, irons also tend to have a long replacement cycle, which hinders replacement sales. To counter this, manufacturers have dramatically increased the number of features found on mid-priced models, with retractable cords, digital displays, push-button readouts and automatic shut-off all becoming increasingly common. All of these things help to make ironing faster and more convenient for consumers, who otherwise would not bother.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The three largest manufacturers of irons in 2010 were Russell Hobbs, SEB North America and Jarden Corp, respectively. Together, these companies accounted for a 66% share of volume sales in 2010. Hamilton Beach Brands held an additional 14% volume share, making the category highly consolidated.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, retail volume sales of irons are expected to remain relatively flat, with overall growth declining by 2% in the period 2010-2015. However, the performance early in the forecast period is expected to be positive, as consumers make replacement purchases which were delayed by the recession. However, after this temporary spike sales are expected to decline, as consumers demonstrate less time, desire and need to iron.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 87 Sales of Irons: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 88 Sales of Irons: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 89 Sales of Irons: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 90 Sales of Irons: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 91 Unit Sales of Irons by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 92 Company Shares of Irons 2006-2010
  • Table 93 Brand Shares of Irons 2007-2010
  • Table 94 Forecast Sales of Irons: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 95 Forecast Sales of Irons: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 96 Forecast Sales of Irons: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 97 Forecast Sales of Irons: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Large Cooking Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Most large cooking appliances are energy-intensive by nature, and thus unable to be made more efficient for the purposes of Energy Star certification by the US Department of Energy. For this reason, large cooking appliances were not eligible for rebate incentives through the “Cash for Appliances” programmes offered by the US government through various states. However, they still benefited indirectly, as some retailers offered package deals for consumers willing to purchase or replace an entire kitchen appliance set (typically a refrigeration appliance, dishwasher and cooker). Many consumers opted for such package deals in order to maintain aesthetic consistency, and to take full advantage of all the discounts and rebates available to them. As a result, the rapid declines in value and volume sales in 2008 and 2009 reversed, and the category saw growth.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The GE brand remained the leading brand in large cooking appliances in 2010 in volume terms, controlling a 24% share of sales. The company managed to increase its lead against its nearest competitor, Broan, which lost a full percentage point of volume share, decreasing to 16%. Broan, the dominant manufacturer of cooker hoods, suffered as demand for this type of appliance waned. The Sears private label brand Kenmore remained in third place, whilst Whirlpool remained in fourth position.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period large cooking appliances is expected to see continued growth, with a volume CAGR of 2% and a constant value CAGR of 4%. This will largely be dependent on a housing recovery and a decline in the unemployment rate, but such economic improvements have been slower to appear than economic analysts first predicted, and may continue to be slow to develop. Since the housing market is a key driver of sales of large cooking appliances, the growth of the category will be closely related to the recovery in house sales.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 98 Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 99 Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 100 Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 101 Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 102 Sales of Built-in Hobs by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 103 Sales of Ovens by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 104 Sales of Cookers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 105 Sales of Range Cookers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 106 Company Shares of Large Cooking Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 107 Brand Shares of Large Cooking Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 108 Company Shares of Built-in Hobs 2006-2010
  • Table 109 Company Shares of Ovens 2006-2010
  • Table 110 Company Shares of Cooker Hoods 2006-2010
  • Table 111 Company Shares of Built-in Cooker Hoods 2006-2010
  • Table 112 Company Shares of Freestanding Cooker Hoods 2006-2010
  • Table 113 Company Shares of Cookers 2006-2010
  • Table 114 Company Shares of Range Cookers 2006-2010
  • Table 115 Forecast Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 116 Forecast Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 117 Forecast Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 118 Forecast Sales of Large Cooking Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Microwaves in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Generally considered convenience items, sales of microwaves decreased in both current value and volume terms in 2010; the fourth consecutive year of such a decline. The slowing sales were largely indicative of the poor economy and consumers willing to “make do” with appliances they already owned, rather than opting for improved models. Indeed, many of the value-added features which many large appliances boast are generally neglected on microwaves, as consumers are simply looking for a basic appliance which can prepare a frozen ready meal or re-heat leftovers.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • General Electric Co (GE) continued to lead microwaves with a 24% share of retail volume sales in 2010, gaining slightly over competitor Sharp Electronics Corp, which declined slightly to a 19% volume share. Panasonic Corp of North America continued to hold steady with a 10% share of volume sales. LG Electronics, which held a steady 8% share through much of the review period, saw an increase in volume share to 9% in 2010, thanks to its LG brand, which lost volume sales more slowly than its competitors as the category declined.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period microwaves is expected to see a positive performance, with a volume CAGR of 3% ,while the constant value CAGR is expected to be 2%. Freestanding models are expected to significantly outperform built-in models, mainly due to the price points involved. Regardless of the format, unit prices are expected to decrease as consumers opt for less expensive models.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 119 Sales of Microwaves by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 120 Sales of Microwaves by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 121 Sales of Microwaves by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 122 Sales of Microwaves by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 123 Sales of Microwaves by Type 2009-2010
  • Table 124 Company Shares of Microwaves 2006-2010
  • Table 125 Brand Shares of Microwaves 2007-2010
  • Table 126 Microwaves by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 127 Forecast Sales of Microwaves by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 128 Forecast Sales of Microwaves by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 129 Forecast Sales of Microwaves by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 130 Forecast Sales of Microwaves by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Personal Care Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Despite the recovering economy and the low price points of most personal care appliances, sales were nonetheless weak in 2010, decreasing by 1% in both volume and current value terms. The category has amongst the lowest average unit prices, second only to irons, but the continuing decline in hair care appliances, coupled with declines in body shavers and other personal care appliances, showed that the category remains susceptible to consumers’ continuing desire to reduce unnecessary expenditure.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Conair Corp remained the single most dominant player in personal care appliances, accounting for a 31% volume share with the Conair brand. This was due mainly to its strong performance in hair care appliances. Helen of Troy was the next largest company, holding a 16% volume share with its Revlon, Vidal Sassoon and Helen of Troy brands. Other major manufacturers include Philips, global manufacturer of Sonicare electric toothbrushes and Norelco electric shavers, and The Gillette Co, subsidiary of consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble, which owns the Braun Oral-B brand.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail volume sales of personal care appliances are predicted to increase by a total of 4% over the forecast period 2010-2015. Whilst this growth is a departure from recent years, which saw declines in sales of personal care appliances, it remains much slower than many other categories. This is mainly because consumers will still be reluctant to spend needlessly, and will be willing to make do with manual products rather than opting for electrical appliances.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 131 Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 132 Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 133 Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 134 Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 135 Sales of Body Shavers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 136 Sales of Body Shavers by Power Source: % Breakdown 2009-2010
  • Table 137 Sales of Hair Care Appliances by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 138 Company Shares of Personal Care Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 139 Brand Shares of Personal Care Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 140 Forecast Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 141 Forecast Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 142 Forecast Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 143 Forecast Sales of Personal Care Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Refrigeration Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The slow economy, the struggling housing market and tight credit market worked against consumers’ ability to make large purchases through much of the review period. In an attempt to stimulate economic growth through consumer spending, the US government announced several stimulus programmes in 2009 and 2010. Key amongst these for refrigeration appliances was the “Cash for Appliances” programme, which apportioned funds to various states, which then gave money to consumers who replaced old appliances with newer, Energy Star certified models. In most consumers’ homes, refrigeration appliances use the most electricity, so upgrading to a newer model can offer savings on running costs. With a rebate as large as US$300 in some states, consumers were able to take advantage, shaving money off their monthly utility bills whilst upgrading their kitchen appliances.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Sears private label brand Kenmore saw strong growth in volume share in 2010, reaching a 19% share of overall refrigeration appliances and helping to strengthen its hold as the top refrigeration appliance brand in the US. This was thanks in large part to Sears’s continued advertising push, highlighting the company’s “Blue Appliance Crew,” a trained sales force dedicated to appliance knowledge and sales. Sears has managed to leverage these commercials to help reclaim some of its share from DIY retailers such as The Home Depot.

PROSPECTS

  • Whilst the US economy officially exited recession in 2010, the recovery has been more subdued than many had hoped. In addition, unemployment remains high, and the housing market remains suppressed. Looking forward, the stimulus programmes which helped to boost the growth of refrigeration appliances in 2010 are unlikely to be repeated, with increasing concern about growing budget deficits in the government. For this reason, the rapid growth of refrigeration appliances which occurred in 2010 is unlikely to be repeated in the near future. However, as the forecast period progresses, growth will return, and the CAGR from 2010-2015 is expected to be 1% in volume terms.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 144 Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 145 Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 146 Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 147 Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 148 Sales of Electric Wine Coolers/Chillers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 149 Sales of Freezers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 150 Sales of Freezers by Volume Capacity: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 151 Sales of Fridge Freezers by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 152 Sales of Fridge Freezers by Static Vs Frost-Free: % Breakdown 2009-2010
  • Table 153 Sales of Fridge Freezers by Volume Capacity: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 154 Sales of Fridges by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 155 Sales of Fridges by Static Vs Frost-Free: % Breakdown 2009-2010
  • Table 156 Sales of Fridges by Volume Capacity: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 157 Company Shares of Refrigeration Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 158 Brand Shares of Refrigeration Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 159 Company Shares of Built-in Fridge Freezers 2006-2010
  • Table 160 Company Shares of Freestanding Fridge Freezers 2006-2010
  • Table 161 Company Shares of Built-in Fridges 2006-2010
  • Table 162 Company Shares of Freestanding Fridges 2006-2010
  • Table 163 Forecast Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 164 Forecast Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 165 Forecast Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 166 Forecast Sales of Refrigeration Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Small Cooking Appliances in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Although the recession has officially ended, unemployment in America remains high, and many consumers continued to feel the pinch in their wallets in 2010. This limited the disposable income which many people were willing to spend on eating out at restaurants, as meals cooked at home can be prepared for much less. At the same time, many consumers wished to recreate the same meals they used to enjoy at full-service restaurants, and consequently looked for products which could help them to recreate a variety of different ethnic cuisines in the kitchen. Small cooking appliances often fulfil this desire, offering specialised and highly-effective ways of preparing a variety of foods.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Russell Hobbs overtook Jarden Corp for the leading position in small cooking appliances in 2010, although the two companies were virtually tied with 22% volume shares. The portfolio of the company includes Black & Decker, Toastmaster, George Foreman, Salton, Farberware and Breadman. Likewise, Jarden maintains a large brand portfolio as the owner of Mr Coffee, Crock Pot, Rival, Oster and Sunbeam and VillaWare. Hamilton Beach Brands held third position with a share of 17%, although its share declined in the latter half of the review period.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period small cooking appliances is expected to see a volume CAGR of 2%. This will be driven largely by coffee machines, which is expected to increase by 24% overall in the forecast period 2010-2015. However, not every category will see such success; breadmakers, sandwich makers and deep fat fryers, each popular at different times over the review period, are expected to see consistent declines throughout the review period. The specialised nature of many small cooking appliances can be a benefit when such products are popular, but this advantage can quickly turn to rapidly declining sales if consumer sentiment turns away from a particular cuisine or cooking fad.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 167 Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 168 Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 169 Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 170 Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 171 Unit Sales of Coffee Machines by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 172 Company Shares of Small Cooking Appliances 2006-2010
  • Table 173 Brand Shares of Small Cooking Appliances 2007-2010
  • Table 174 Forecast Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 175 Forecast Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 176 Forecast Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 177 Forecast Sales of Small Cooking Appliances by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-Cooking) in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Small kitchen appliances has not proven to be as resilient in the face of the poor economy as other categories of appliances associated with food. Packaged food companies are increasingly offering products which are already prepared, thus negating the need for many small kitchen appliances. If sliced deli meat is available at the grocery store at no discernable premium, there is no incentive for consumers to buy a food and meat slicer for use at home. For this reason, many consumers simply view small kitchen appliances to be irrelevant to their daily needs, driving demand down. As innovations in packaging become less expensive and more widely used (such as easy-open can ends), consumers will no longer need such products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Since acquired by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Russell Hobbs retained its leading position in small kitchen appliances (non-cooking), accounting for a 23% share of volume sales, largely through its Black & Decker brand. Hamilton Beach Brands remained in second place with a 13% share of volume sales. Jarden Corp likewise held a 13% share of volume sales through its Mr Coffee, Oster and Rival brands. These top three companies control the majority of sales, with the remainder of companies in small kitchen appliances each holding volume shares of less than 6%.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, sales of small kitchen appliances (non-cooking) are expected to be almost completely flat, with a slightly negative CAGR in volume terms. Any gains in popular categories such as coffee mills are likely to be offset by the increasing irrelevance of products such as electric can openers (in other small kitchen appliances). At the same time, constant value sales of small kitchen appliances are expected to increase by less than 1% overall from 2010 to 2015.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 178 Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 179 Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 180 Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 181 Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 182 Company Shares of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) 2006-2010
  • Table 183 Brand Shares of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) 2007-2010
  • Table 184 Forecast Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 185 Forecast Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 186 Forecast Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 187 Forecast Sales of Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-cooking) by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Vacuum Cleaners in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Due to illnesses such as asthma and allergies, and diseases caused by viruses and bacteria, maintaining a clean home environment is increasingly important for consumers, particularly as the population of America ages. In 2006, Bissell introduced a popular model which featured a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration system which seals in nearly 100% of dust, pollen and other pollutants, and only discharges purified air back into the room. Other companies quickly followed, and sought to improve on health claims. In 2008, Halo Technologies went a step further than HEPA filtration, offering an ultraviolet light designed to kill dust mites, bacteria and other germs from the air (UV-C light is used by water treatment facilities to purify water, and is used in hospitals to sterilise equipment). Whilst most manufacturers have not gone quite so far, health systems and related marketing claims have proliferated, and were a key factor in stimulating sales throughout the review period.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • TTI Floor Care North America continued to dominate vacuum cleaners in 2010, controlling a 32% share of volume sales. The company has consistently built the volume share for both of its major brands (Dirt Devil and Hoover), since it acquired the Hoover brand from Whirlpool Corp in 2007.

PROSPECTS

  • An overall shift to the premium segment is forecast within vacuum cleaners. Manufacturers which can combine design with the technological advances of more health-conscious consumers will find greater success. The vacuum cleaners category is expected to increase by 10% in volume terms overall over the forecast period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 188 Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 189 Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 190 Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 191 Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 192 Unit Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Format: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 193 Unit Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Power Source: % Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 194 Company Shares of Vacuum Cleaners 2006-2010
  • Table 195 Brand Shares of Vacuum Cleaners 2007-2010
  • Table 196 Forecast Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 197 Forecast Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 198 Forecast Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 199 Forecast Sales of Vacuum Cleaners by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Consumer Appliances
    • Major Appliances
      • Built-In Major Appliances
      • Freestanding Major Appliances
      • Dishwashers
        • Built-In Dishwashers
        • Freestanding Dishwashers
      • Home Laundry Appliances
        • Built-In Home Laundry Appliances
        • Freestanding Home Laundry Appliances
        • Automatic Tumble Dryers
          • Built-In Tumble Dryers
          • Freestanding Tumble Dryers
        • Automatic Washer Dryers
          • Built-In Washer Dryers
          • Freestanding Washer Dryers
        • Automatic Washing Machines
          • Built-In Automatic Washing Machines
          • Freestanding Automatic Washing Machines
        • Semi-Automatic Washing Machines
        • Other Home Laundry Appliances
          • Other Built-In Home Laundry Appliances
          • Other Freestanding Home Laundry Appliances
      • Large Cooking Appliances
        • Built-In Large Cooking Appliances
        • Freestanding Large Cooking Appliances
        • Built-In Hobs
        • Ovens
        • Cooker Hoods
          • Built-In Cooker Hoods
          • Freestanding Cooker Hoods
        • Cookers
        • Range Cookers
      • Microwaves
        • Built-In Microwaves
        • Freestanding Microwaves
      • Refrigeration Appliances
        • Built-In Refrigeration Appliances
        • Freestanding Refrigeration Appliances
        • Electric Wine Coolers/Chillers
          • Built-In Electric Wine Coolers/Chillers
          • Freestanding Electric Wine Coolers/Chillers
        • Freezers
          • Built-In Freezers
          • Freestanding Freezers
        • Fridge Freezers
          • Built-In Fridge Freezers
          • Freestanding Fridge Freezers
        • Fridges
          • Built-In Fridges
          • Freestanding Fridges
    • Small Appliances
      • Air Treatment Products
        • Air Purifiers
        • Cooling
          • Air Conditioners
            • Room Air Conditioners
            • Split Air Conditioners
            • Window Air Conditioners
          • Air Coolers
          • Ceiling Fans
          • Cooling Fans
            • Desk Fans
            • Standing Fans
            • Tower Fans
        • Dehumidifiers
        • Humidifiers
        • Other Air Treatment Products
      • Food Preparation Appliances
        • Blenders
          • Countertop Blenders
          • Hand Blenders
        • Citrus Pressers
        • Food Processors
        • Grinders And Choppers
        • Juice Extractors
        • Mixers
          • Countertop Mixers
          • Hand Mixers
        • Smoothie Makers
        • Other Food Preparation Appliances
      • Heating Appliances
        • Convector Heaters
        • Electric Blankets
        • Electric Fires
        • Fan Heaters
        • Oil-Filled Radiators
        • Panel Heaters
        • Other Heating Appliances
      • Irons
      • Personal Care Appliances
        • Body Shavers
        • Hair Care Appliances
        • Oral Hygiene Appliances
          • Battery Toothbrush Units
          • Electric Toothbrush Units
          • Other Oral Hygiene Appliances
        • Other Personal Care Appliances
      • Small Cooking Appliances
        • Breadmakers
        • Coffee Machines
        • Deep Fat Fryers
        • Electric Grills
        • Electric Steamers
        • Freestanding Hobs
        • Mini Ovens
        • Rice Cookers
        • Rotisseries And Roasters
        • Sandwich Makers
        • Slow Cookers
        • Toasters
        • Waffle Makers
        • Other Small Cooking Appliances
      • Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-Cooking)
        • Coffee Mills
        • Food And Meat Slicers
        • Kettles
        • Other Small Kitchen Appliances (Non-Cooking)
      • Vacuum Cleaners
        • Cylinder Vacuum Cleaners
        • Stick Vacuum Cleaners
        • Handheld Vacuum Cleaners
        • Upright Vacuum Cleaners
        • Wet And Dry Vacuum Cleaners
        • Other Vacuum Cleaners

Statistics Included

Statistics Included

For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

From Passport

  • Market sizes
  • Company shares
  • Brand shares
  • Distribution
  • Analysis by format
  • Analysis by power source
  • Analysis by type
  • Household penetration
  • Pricing
  • Refrigeration volume capacity
  • Replacement cycles
  • Washing machine capacity

Market size details:

  • Retail volume
  • Retail volume % growth
  • Retail volume per capita
  • Retail value retail selling price % growth
  • Retail value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
  • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
  • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY

Methodology

Methodology

Global insight and local knowledge

With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

Industry specialists

Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

Country and regional analysts

Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

In-country research network

To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

Research Methodology

Our research methods

Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

Desk research

With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

  • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
  • National and international trade press
  • National and international trade associations
  • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
  • Company financials and annual reports
  • Broker reports
  • Online databases
  • The financial, business and mainstream press

Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

Store checks

Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

  • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
  • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
  • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
  • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

Trade survey

Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

Trade surveys allow us to:

  • Fill gaps in available published data per company
  • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
  • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
  • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

Company analysis

At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

Forecasts

Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

Data validation

All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

Market analysis

Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

my pages

Want to find out more about this report?