You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesConsumer Foodservice
print my pages

Country Report

Consumer Foodservice in Romania

Nov 2012

Price: US$1,900

About this Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Consumer foodservice declines in 2011

2011 witnessed the decline of consumer foodservice in Romania, as a result of reduced purchasing power, as well as the rapid loss of confidence by Romanians in their future since the boom in 2008 when they proved to be the most optimistic Europeans. This turnaround had a negative impact on overall consumption and on consumer foodservice in particular, perceived as expensive during the recession. The painful steps taken for the reduction of the deficit such as decreased salaries in the public system and the growth of VAT by five percentage points in 2010, continued to show negative effects in 2011 on both purchasing power and the performance of consumer foodservice as a whole.

Reduction of sales dictated by diminished purchasing power

The poor economic situation was the main factor responsible for decline of consumer foodservice in 2011. A reduction of incomes came naturally as a result of the austerity measures taken by the Government in order to reduce the deficit, which impacted the incomes of employees in the public system as well as in the private companies. Both had to cope with higher taxes and a changing attitude towards consumption at the expense of saving and caution regarding the future. As a consequence, the main trend of 2011 was the switch from eating out to home cooking and eating, with an impact on overall consumer foodservice.

Domination of multinational chains in 2011

Chained operators continued to account for a small proportion within total outlets in 2011, but they proved to be more successful despite the poor economic conditions. Multinationals accounted for the majority of chains but their presence remained limited to Bucharest and other larger cities with significant economic activity. In this context, McDonald’s Romania SRL was by far the leading player in both value and transaction terms, relying on nationwide presence and strong recognition. KFC, from US Food Network SA, also improved its second ranking position while the reduction of incomes contributed to the performance of Fornetti Romania SRL which led by far in outlets and dominated kiosks.

Overall decline for independents

Consumer foodservice remained highly fragmented in 2011, with many small outlets operated by a family business. These small outlets were a familiar presence in smaller cities and villages and consisted mainly of small restaurants, bars and kiosks. The small outlets also retained supremacy in Bucharest and large cities but the performance was affected by the presence of chains, which gained recognition through advertising, promotions, word-of-mouth and strong presence in the food courts of large retailers and shopping centres. Chained fast food and kiosks were the most visible but traditional full-service restaurants and cafés also moved rapidly to a strong exposure and important recognition from urban consumers.

Forecast growth under the impact of slow economic recovery

Considering the steps taken by the Government for a reduction of the budget deficit, Romanians are becoming more pessimistic regarding the evolution of the economy over the forecast period, with a growing number losing confidence in a rapid economic recovery. The effect of the crisis will be seen until the end of the forecast period, when Romania hopes to find itself in the same situation as it was in the booming period 2006-2008, when it witnessed an impressive growth of the GDP but also important changes in purchasing habits and lifestyle. Consumers in Bucharest and large cities will continue to change their lifestyles towards the increasing acceptance of concepts such as 100% home delivery/takeaway, specialist coffee shops and foreign cuisine full-service restaurants but will start to appreciate heavily the self-service cafeterias as an excellent place for rapid consumption of cooked meals.


Samples (FAQs about samples):

doc_pdf.png Sample Consumer Foodservice by Location Market Research Report

doc_excel_table.png Sample Consumer Foodservice by Location Data

Delivery: Files are delivered directly into your account within a few minutes of purchase.

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Consumer Foodservice by Location industry in Romania with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Consumer Foodservice by Location industry in Romania, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in Romania for free:

The Consumer Foodservice by Location in Romania market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Consumer Foodservice by Location in Romania?
  • What are the major brands in Romania?
  • How are economic or demographic factors impacting the foodservice industry in #Country»?
  • How are multinational and local operators expanding in #Country»?
  • How have consumer lifestyle trends and eating habits influenced foodservice in #Country»?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Consumer Foodservice market research database.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Consumer Foodservice in Romania - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Consumer foodservice declines in 2011

Reduction of sales dictated by diminished purchasing power

Domination of multinational chains in 2011

Overall decline for independents

Forecast growth under the impact of slow economic recovery

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Consumer foodservice affected by the loss of purchasing power

Consumer foodservice under the impact of domestic tourism

Food courts track the expansion of large retailers

Chains expand mainly through franchising

Ban on smoking in public places impacts consumer foodservice

Consumer foodservice in rural areas has potential

MARKET DATA

  • Table 1 Units, Transactions and Value Sales in Consumer Foodservice: 2006-2011
  • Table 2 Units, Transactions and Value Sales in Consumer Foodservice: % Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 3 Consumer Foodservice by Independent Vs Chained Outlets: Units/Outlets 2011
  • Table 4 Consumer Foodservice by Eat in Vs Takeaway 2011
  • Table 5 Consumer Foodservice by Food Vs Drinks Split 2011
  • Table 6 Sales in Consumer Foodservice by Location 2006-2011
  • Table 7 Leading Chained Consumer Foodservice Brands by Number of Units 2011
  • Table 8 Chained Consumer Foodservice Company Shares 2007-2011
  • Table 9 Chained Consumer Foodservice Brand Shares 2008-2011
  • Table 10 Forecast Units, Transactions and Value Sales in Consumer Foodservice: 2011-2016
  • Table 11 Forecast Units, Transactions and Value Sales in Consumer Foodservice: % Growth 2011-2016

APPENDIX

  • Table 12 Consumer Expenditure on Consumer Foodservice 2004-2009
  • Table 13 Companies in services to population –Restaurants, bars, canteens, others 2004-2009

OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

DEFINITIONS

SOURCES

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Consumer Foodservice in Romania - Company Profiles

Fornetti Romania SRL in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 4 Fornetti Romania SRL: Competitive Position 2011

Gregory's Romania SA in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 7 Gregory’s Romania SA: Competitive Position 2011

Snack Attack SRL in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 10 Snack Attack SRL: Competitive Position 2011

Trotter Prim SRL in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 13 Trotter Prim SRL: Competitive Position 2011

Trotter Restaurant SRL in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 16 Trotter Restaurant SRL: Competitive Position 2011

Turabo Grup SRL in Consumer Foodservice (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

SUPPLIERS

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 19 Turabo Grup SRL: Competitive Position 2011

100% Home Delivery/Takeaway in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • 2011 continued to witness the negative effects of the financial crisis and the austerity measures taken to combat the public deficit. The main result was the decrease of available incomes for the majority of the population. However, a more intense economic lifestyle was characteristic for Bucharest and some larger cities, which can be translated into higher comparative incomes for office employees who are also the heaviest consumers of 100% home delivery/takeaway. The growth of 100% home delivery/takeaway was not necessarily the consequence of longer working hours but more related to the changes in lifestyle and the growing acceptance of 100% home delivery/takeaway by office employees of all ages as convenient and relatively cheap.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The most active player Jerry’s Pizza was the best performer in 2011, operating 10 outlets and benefiting from an excellent word-of-mouth and customer loyalty. Its strategy consisted of the establishment of outlets in the most developed areas of Bucharest. These were operated by three distinct companies, Jerry’s Pizza Est SRL, Jerry’s Pizza Nord SRL and Jerry’s Pizza Vest SRL, improving their service to the customers with fast order processing and delivery.

PROSPECTS

  • 100% home delivery/takeaway is predicted to record good growth rates over the forecast period. However, the first year 2012 is not expected to show significant recovery because of the austerity programs imposed by the Government in 2010 and which affected mainly public employees and pensioners would continue to show negative effects on the purchasing power despite the estimated economic growth. Over the forecast period, the expected economic growth, as well as the compensation of wages for public employees and pensioners will become a support for the dynamics of 100% home delivery/takeaway. Weekends will continue to show diminished activity for 100% home delivery/take away as people will return to home cooking due to adverse economic conditions. In these conditions, most of the companies involved in the category will have to close activity on Sunday and to reduce opening hours on a Saturday.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 14 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 15 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 16 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 17 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 18 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 19 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 20 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway 2007-2011
  • Table 21 Brand Shares of Chained 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway 2008-2011
  • Table 22 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 23 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 24 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 25 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 26 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 27 Forecast Sales in 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Cafés/Bars in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • 2011 continued to be affected by the austerity measures taken in 2010 in order to reduce the public deficit, with a main consequence being the reduction of purchasing power for the majority of the population. As a result, the frequency of cafés/bars reduced significantly in 2011. This situation was mainly obvious in small cities and rural areas as well as in large cities, where small bars retained interest only for consumption of alcoholic drinks, while consumption of coffee remained in most cases a completion to the drinksMeanwhile, in Bucharest and other large cities, upscale cafés were increasingly frequented by young professionals, who consider coffee as an important mean for discussions and meeting friends and of which the lifestyle was less affected by the crisis.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Bet Arena Cafe could be considered as the indisputable leading brand in 2011, after the launch of the concept in 2010. The fact that the chain operated more than 150 outlets at the end of 2011 made it the overall leader also for transactions and value sales, although transactions and value sales per outlet remained under the figures of other chains.

PROSPECTS

  • The effect of the crisis and austerity measures taken in 2010, with the toughest consequences on purchasing power in 2011 resulted in a decline of the review period value growth average. As a consequence, the fact that Romania has passed over the recession and is estimated to witness economic growth should lead to a forecast constant value CAGR of 4%. Leisure will be the main attraction for Romanians when the effects of the economic recovery would become noticeable as Romanians have learned during the crisis the lesson of caution for loans and high expenditure for the purchase of durable goods and dwellings.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 28 Cafés/Bars by Category: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 29 Cafés/Bars by Category: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 30 Cafés/Bars by Category: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 31 Cafés/Bars by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 32 Cafés/Bars by Category: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 33 Cafés/Bars by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 34 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained Cafés/Bars 2007-2011
  • Table 35 Brand Shares of Chained Cafés/Bars 2008-2011
  • Table 36 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 37 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 38 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 39 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 40 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 41 Forecast Sales in Cafés/Bars by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Consumer Foodservice by Location in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The reduction of consumers’ purchasing power in 2011 due to the austerity measures and the negative effects of the crisis did not show too strong an impact on lifestyles and consumption habits but was noticeable in the dynamics of outlets, transactions and value growth. While the number of outlets and transactions registered only small declines as consumers did want to completely refrain from eating out, value sales suffered more as the same consumers had to adapt to the reduction of incomes and paid less per transaction. According to the new lifestyles dictated by the large retailers, Romanians in large cities remained dedicated to weekend shopping, thus creating a trend for switching from standalone outlets to retail outlets. An interest in tourism and leisure also remained significant during weekends.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Independent outlets continued to retain the majority of sales in lodging and leisure, while retail and travel relied on chains like McDonald’s, KFC and Springtime, expanding together with retail chains. OMV Viva and Hei remained the most important in travel, pegged to OMV Romania Mineraloel and Rompetrol petrol stations respectively. Domestic chains active in full-service restaurants such as La Mama, City Grill, Pizzeria Bella Italia and Springtime, Tip Top and French Bakery in fast food developed through standalone locations. The same is for City Cafe, Tempo Cafe and Turabo Cafe. Specialist coffee shops, dominated by Starbucks and Gloria Jean’s Coffees, have developed through retail. Turabo increased its location areas and entered also into retail, while Tempo Cafe was linked to the expansion of Springtime fast food in retail locations.

PROSPECTS

  • The recession could be considered as over at the end of the review period, according to statements by the Government, but the effects of the crisis will continue to show effects on consumer purchasing power in 2012 and onwards, although the incomes of consumers and pensions reduced with the austerity measures will be brought back to the level of 2010 until the end of 2012. The urban population is expected to suffer more than the rural population, which continued to rely on a traditional lifestyle but is expected to become busier in terms of shopping in the neighbouring cities, while tourist activity will grow slowly. Weekends on the coast will be busier over the forecast period, especially as the highway makes a direct link between Bucharest and the summer resorts. However, the focus during weekends will remain also on shopping and the associated entertainment.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 42 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 43 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 44 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 45 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 46 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 47 Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 48 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 49 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 50 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 51 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 52 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 53 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 54 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 55 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 56 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 57 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 58 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 59 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 60 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 61 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 62 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 63 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 64 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 65 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 66 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 67 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 68 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 69 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 70 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 71 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 72 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 73 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 74 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 75 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 76 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 77 Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 78 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 79 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 80 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 81 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 82 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 83 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales by Location: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 84 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 85 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 86 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 87 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 88 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 89 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Standalone: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 90 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 91 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 92 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 93 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 94 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 95 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Leisure: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 96 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 97 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 98 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 99 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 100 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 101 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Retail: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 102 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 103 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 104 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 105 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 106 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 107 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Lodging: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 108 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 109 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 110 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 111 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 112 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 113 Forecast Consumer Foodservice Sales through Travel: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Fast Food in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Fast food also experienced a loss of pace in 2011, resulting from diminished consumer purchasing power which followed the austerity measures applied in 2010. On the other hand, the expansion of shopping centres and hypermarkets led to a change in purchasing habits and lifestyles of Romanians. Shopping in modern retailing was transformed by Romanians into leisure, with important impact on the growth of foodservice activity, increasingly popular after the finish of purchasing activity. Despite the impact of the crisis on the economy, Romanians remained attached to the weekend shopping in the large retailers which represented an advantage for fast food chains that normally track the large retailers. It can be said that chains in fact have decided the evolution of fast food as they account for a major share in terms of value sales and transactions when compared to the number of outlets.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • McDonald’s Romania SRL remained the dominant leader of fast food in 2011 with 34% value share, with the company concentrating its efforts more on the modernisation of existing outlets rather than opening of new ones. In fact, 2011 witnessed the opening of only one new outlet but succeeded to be present in 21 cities across the whole country. The expansion tracks mainly the opening of new shopping centres or hypermarkets’ galleries with food courts, while modernisation is focused on standalone locations.

PROSPECTS

  • The presence of large chains and the changes in lifestyle are predicted to have the strongest impact on fast food over the forecast period. The busy life in Bucharest and other large cities with strong economic activity are expected to sustain the good growth of fast food over the forecast period. Independent outlets, which are predicted to retain the majority share, will be affected by the slow economic recovery and the diminished purchasing power, but the fact that they generally target lower-income consumers in the country will reduce the impact, although there will not be any significant openings of new outlets. Chains will be the winners of the crisis because they rely on strong recognition and Romanians with lower incomes will increase the frequency of the chains at the expense of full-service restaurants due to the perception of fast food as providing cheaper leisure and entertainment.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 114 Fast Food by Category: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 115 Fast Food by Category: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 116 Fast Food by Category: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 117 Fast Food by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 118 Fast Food by Category: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 119 Fast Food by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 120 Sales of Bakery Products Fast Food by Type 2008-2011
  • Table 121 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained Fast Food 2007-2011
  • Table 122 Brand Shares of Chained Fast Food 2008-2011
  • Table 123 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 124 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 125 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 126 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 127 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 128 Forecast Sales in Fast Food by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Full-Service Restaurants in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The performance of full-service restaurants in 2011 was strongly affected by the crisis and the austerity measures taken in 2010 which had as its main effect, the reduction of consumer purchasing power, with an impact on the mass frequency of this category. On the other hand, the strong improvement of the purchasing power during the period 2006-20008 had an important impact on lifestyles as more money was available for leisure and eating out. Consequently, there was a noticeable trend towards the increased sophistication of outlets, especially as eating out also increasingly became an important part of daily business activities and full-service restaurants represented the destination sought by business people and professionals for a business lunch. In this situation, Bucharest and the large cities drove the performance of full-service restaurants, benefiting from higher comparative incomes and concentrating almost totally on business tourism due to a more intense economic activity.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Pizza Hut retained the leadership of full-service restaurants in 2011 in value terms and ranked among the top three leaders in terms of transactions and number of outlets. It accounted for an early presence and a strong development in large cities and location in city centres and shopping centres. It benefited from the perception of an excellent place to eat out and entertain. Meanwhile, OMV Viva and Hei, operated by Petrom and Rompetrol Holding, the largest domestic producers of gas and attached to the largest gas station chains Petrom and Rompetrol, outperformed by far the rest of the chains in terms of outlets and transactions. Organised as full-service restaurants, OMV Viva and Hei restaurants benefit from a strong attendance for 24 hours due to increasing road travel and transportation.

PROSPECTS

  • The improvement of purchasing power during the booming period 2006-2008 was the support for changes in lifestyle, which will continue to show effects over the forecast period despite the adverse economic conditions. The recovery of consumers’ purchasing power is expected to leave more money in the pockets of Romanians especially as the demand for dwellings and durable goods would continue to decrease. As a consequence, the surplus of cash would be directed to saving but also to leisure and tourism, with a positive impact on full-service restaurants. This is projected to lead to higher expenditure per transaction and a growing number of sophisticated outlets. Additionally, full-service restaurants will continue to be preferred by tourists, domestic and foreign, both for leisure and for business.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 129 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 130 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 131 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 132 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 133 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 134 Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 135 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained Full-Service Restaurants 2007-2011
  • Table 136 Brand Shares of Chained Full-Service Restaurants 2008-2011
  • Table 137 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 138 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 139 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 140 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 141 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 142 Forecast Sales in Full-Service Restaurants by Category: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Self-Service Cafeterias in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Although popular during communism, self-service cafeterias remained out of favour for years. However, it started to show a contribution to consumer foodservice due to the activity within a two-three month period each year in crowded summer resorts near the seaside, being closed the rest of the year. The fact that this outlet type needs a minimal number of consumers to break even makes it operational in city centres and office areas. The negative effects of the crisis on consumers’ available incomes and the search for cheaper cooked food, served rapidly, contributed to the increasing success of self-service cafeterias in large cities as well as in the holiday resorts.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • IKEA cafeteria was the leading brand in 2011. Launched in 2007, together with the IKEA store, it soon became an excellent place for entertainment after shopping. The location in the Northern rich area, developed in the last years of the review period as an exclusive neighbourhood, as well as a strong office area, enabled the outlet to perform excellently during the week as well, when it is attended at lunch by office employees and in the evening by residents of the area.

PROSPECTS

  • Seasonal activity will likely continue to be the most prominent face of self-service cafeterias, and summer resorts are expected to continue almost totally representing this business. Meanwhile, fashionable outlets in the centre of Bucharest and large cities would lead to a good performance for self-service cafeterias over the forecast period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 143 Self-Service Cafeterias: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 144 Self-Service Cafeterias: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 145 Self-Service Cafeterias: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 146 Self-Service Cafeterias: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 147 Self-Service Cafeterias: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 148 Self-Service Cafeterias: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 149 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained Self-Service Cafeterias 2007-2011
  • Table 150 Brand Shares of Chained Self-Service Cafeterias 2008-2011
  • Table 151 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 152 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 153 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 154 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 155 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 156 Forecast Sales in Self-Service Cafeterias: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Street Stalls/Kiosks in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The continued positive growth rates in 2011 for transactions and value sales of street stalls/kiosks on a national level was the result of the continuous preference of Romanians for pastries and pies sold fresh and eaten on-the-go or at home. The convenience of kiosks can be translated into highly available places to buy cheaper, fresh bakery products and this perception has not changed for decades. The popularity of kiosks remained practically unaltered in 2011, despite the negative effects of the crisis on the incomes of the majority of the population. The decline in the number of outlets was the consequence of the closure of such small businesses in small cities and the countryside.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Fornetti was by far the indisputable leading brand in 2011. It was also the largest franchised business in Romania in terms of opened outlets. It continued its expansion by own investment or by franchising. On the other hand, the main domestic chains, Gogoasa Infuriata, Gogoasa Yami, Auguri and Fitosica, developed first through their own investment which was followed by franchising the concept. Nevertheless, even with franchising, they ranked far behind Fornetti.

PROSPECTS

  • The negative effects of the recession are estimated to have a positive impact on kiosks in 2011, when purchasing power registered a serious decline. In fact, for the low-income groups, street stalls/kiosks are perceived as providing good food at affordable prices and rapid service. The price for a complete meal can be considered lower than that from a fast food outlet or full-service restaurant.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 157 Street Stalls/Kiosks: Units/Outlets 2006-2011
  • Table 158 Street Stalls/Kiosks: Number of Transactions 2006-2011
  • Table 159 Street Stalls/Kiosks: Foodservice Value 2006-2011
  • Table 160 Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Units/Outlets Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 161 Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Transaction Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 162 Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Foodservice Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 163 Global Brand Owner Shares of Chained Street Stalls/Kiosks 2007-2011
  • Table 164 Brand Shares of Chained Street Stalls/Kiosks 2008-2011
  • Table 165 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: Units/Outlets 2011-2016
  • Table 166 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: Number of Transactions 2011-2016
  • Table 167 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: Foodservice Value 2011-2016
  • Table 168 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Units/Outlets Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 169 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Transaction Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 170 Forecast Sales in Street Stalls/Kiosks: % Foodservice Value Growth 2011-2016

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Consumer Foodservice
    • Consumer Foodservice by Type
      • Chained Consumer Foodservice
      • Independent Consumer Foodservice
      • 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
        • Chained 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
        • Independent 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
        • Pizza 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Chained Pizza 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Independent Pizza 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
        • Other 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Chained Other 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Independent Other 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
      • Cafés/Bars
        • Chained Cafés/Bars
        • Independent Cafés/Bars
        • Bars/Pubs
          • Chained Bars/Pubs
          • Independent Bars/Pubs
        • Cafés
          • Chained Cafés
          • Independent Cafés
        • Juice/Smoothie Bars
          • Chained Juice/Smoothie Bars
          • Independent Juice/Smoothie Bars
        • Specialist Coffee Shops
          • Chained Specialist Coffee Shops
          • Independent Specialist Coffee Shops
      • Full-Service Restaurants
        • Chained Full-Service Restaurants
        • Independent Full-Service Restaurants
        • Asian Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Asian Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Asian Full-Service Restaurants
        • European Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained European Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent European Full-Service Restaurants
        • Latin American Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Latin American Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Latin American Full-Service Restaurants
        • Middle Eastern Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Middle Eastern Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Middle Eastern Full-Service Restaurants
        • North American Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained North American Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent North American Full-Service Restaurants
        • Pizza Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Pizza Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Pizza Full-Service Restaurants
        • Other Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Other Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Other Full-Service Restaurants
        • Casual Dining Full-Service Restaurants
          • Chained Casual Dining Full-Service Restaurants
          • Independent Casual Dining Full-Service Restaurants
      • Fast Food
        • Chained Fast Food
        • Independent Fast Food
        • Asian Fast Food
          • Chained Asian Fast Food
          • Independent Asian Fast Food
        • Bakery Products Fast Food
          • Chained Bakery Products Fast Food
          • Independent Bakery Products Fast Food
        • Burger Fast Food
          • Chained Burger Fast Food
          • Independent Burger Fast Food
        • Chicken Fast Food
          • Chained Chicken Fast Food
          • Independent Chicken Fast Food
        • Convenience Stores Fast Food
          • Chained Convenience Stores Fast Food
          • Independent Convenience Stores Fast Food
        • Fish Fast Food
          • Chained Fish Fast Food
          • Independent Fish Fast Food
        • Ice Cream Fast Food
          • Chained Ice Cream Fast Food
          • Independent Ice Cream Fast Food
        • Latin American Fast Food
          • Chained Latin American Fast Food
          • Independent Latin American Fast Food
        • Middle Eastern Fast Food
          • Chained Middle Eastern Fast Food
          • Independent Middle Eastern Fast Food
        • Pizza Fast Food
          • Chained Pizza Fast Food
          • Independent Pizza Fast Food
        • Other Fast Food
          • Chained Other Fast Food
          • Independent Other Fast Food
        • Fast Casual Dining
      • Self-Service Cafeterias
        • Chained Self-Service Cafeterias
        • Independent Self-Service Cafeterias
      • Street Stalls/Kiosks
        • Chained Street Stalls/Kiosks
        • Independent Street Stalls/Kiosks
      • Pizza Consumer Foodservice
        • Chained Pizza Consumer Foodservice
          • Chained Pizza 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Chained Pizza Fast Food
          • Chained Pizza Full-Service Restaurants
        • Independent Pizza Consumer Foodservice
          • Independent Pizza 100% Home Delivery/Takeaway
          • Independent Pizza Fast Food
          • Independent Pizza Full-Service Restaurants
    • Consumer Foodservice by Location
      • Consumer Foodservice Through Standalone
        • 100% Home Delivery Through Standalone
        • Cafés/Bars Through Standalone
        • Fast Food Through Standalone
        • Full-Service Restaurants Through Standalone
        • Self-Service Cafeterias Through Standalone
        • Street Stalls/Kiosks Through Standalone
      • Consumer Foodservice Through Leisure
        • 100% Home Delivery Through Leisure
        • Cafés/Bars Through Leisure
        • Fast Food Through Leisure
        • Full-Service Restaurants Through Leisure
        • Self-Service Cafeterias Through Leisure
        • Street Stalls/Kiosks Through Leisure
      • Consumer Foodservice Through Retail
        • 100% Home Delivery Through Retail
        • Cafés/Bars Through Retail
        • Fast Food Through Retail
        • Full-Service Restaurants Through Retail
        • Self-Service Cafeterias Through Retail
        • Street Stalls/Kiosks Through Retail
      • Consumer Foodservice Through Lodging
        • 100% Home Delivery Through Lodging
        • Cafés/Bars Through Lodging
        • Fast Food Through Lodging
        • Full-Service Restaurants Through Lodging
        • Self-Service Cafeterias Through Lodging
        • Street Stalls/Kiosks Through Lodging
      • Consumer Foodservice Through Travel
        • 100% Home Delivery Through Travel
        • Cafés/Bars Through Travel
        • Fast Food Through Travel
        • Full-Service Restaurants Through Travel
        • Self-Service Cafeterias Through Travel
        • Street Stalls/Kiosks Through Travel

Statistics Included

Statistics Included

For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

From Passport

  • Market sizes
  • Company shares
  • Brand shares
  • Analysis by type
  • Chained vs independent
  • Eat-in vs take-away sales
  • Food vs drink sales
  • Pricing
  • Sales by location

Market size details:

  • Foodservice value retail selling price % growth
  • Foodservice value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Units/outlets
  • Units/outlets % growth
  • Units/outlets per capita
  • Transactions
  • Transactions % growth
  • Transactions per capita

Methodology

Methodology

Global insight and local knowledge

With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

Industry specialists

Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

Country and regional analysts

Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

In-country research network

To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

Research Methodology

Our research methods

Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

Desk research

With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

  • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
  • National and international trade press
  • National and international trade associations
  • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
  • Company financials and annual reports
  • Broker reports
  • Online databases
  • The financial, business and mainstream press

Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

Store checks

Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

  • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
  • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
  • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
  • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

Trade survey

Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

Trade surveys allow us to:

  • Fill gaps in available published data per company
  • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
  • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
  • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

Company analysis

At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

Forecasts

Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

Data validation

All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

Market analysis

Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

my pages

Want to find out more about this report?

If you purchase a report that is updated in the next 60 days, we will send you the new edition of the report and the data extract FREE!