You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesSoft Drinks
print my pages

Country Report

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in the US

Feb 2011

Price: $900

About this Report

About this Report

Delivery method: instant download
Report format: PDF doc_pdf.png (download a sample)
Market statistics: Excel workbook doc_excel_table.png (download a sample)

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Fruit/Vegetable Juice industry in USA with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Fruit/Vegetable Juice industry in USA, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

The Fruit/Vegetable Juice in USA market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Fruit/Vegetable Juice in USA?
  • What are the major brands in USA?
  • What are the flavour trends in fruit juice and vegetable juice?
  • What is the market share of smoothies in the 100% juice sector? Have there been any new product launches in the last year?
  • What is the key on-trade distribution for fruit juice and vegetable juice in USA?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Soft Drinks market research database.

Sample Analysis

TRENDS

  • Despite the slowdown in the overall juice category, private label juices managed a slight increase in off-trade and total volume and their off-trade value shares remained steady. Private label brands now account for 21% of total juice sales. Consumers are switching down to cheaper comparable products as major manufacturers, such as Coca-Cola with its Minute Maid brand and Tropicana, continue to increase unit price to offset rising production costs. The shift to private label brands combined with the price hikes led to a 1% increase in 2010 unit prices.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Coca-Cola Co leads total juice volume sales with a 20% share with its Minute Maid, Simply, and Odwalla brands. Coca-Cola has strategically positioned its similar juice products to attract different types of consumers. The Minute Maid brand is positioned to attract the general consumer, often being fortified with functional ingredients such as plant sterols for joint and heart health. Odwalla is its super-premium brand positioned to attract consumers who are concerned with both the environment and wellbeing. Its products are branded as earth-friendly and its smoothies use only naturally-healthy products, thus enabling it to charge a premium for them. The Simply brand is positioned for consumers who prefer fruit juice with no additives. In late 2009, Coca-Cola Co started to manufacture the Simply brand in a smaller size for convenience store sales. This placement has been a success as it opened up more distribution channels and helped to maintain Coca-Cola’s volume share in a disappointing year for juices. The smaller packaging size and increased distribution for Simply was a primary reason the company has an 18% share of off-trade value, posting a one percentage point gain in 2010.

PROSPECTS

  • Fruit/vegetable juice sales are projected to decline by 2% over the 2010-2015 forecast period, with total volume sales falling to 11.4 billion litres. High-sugar juices will continue to decline as consumers desire healthier products and functional ingredients. Stevia-sweetened nectars will help offset some of the decline, providing consumers with a naturally-sweetened juice product with fewer calories and less sugar than 100% juices. Meanwhile, juice drinks remain a popular product for convenience store purchases as parents see it as a better alternative than carbonated soda for their children to drink.

Trends

  • Fountain on-trade volume sales declined by a little under 1% in 2010, falling to 12.7 billion litres. The decline was actually an improvement of the previous year’s performance. Total fountain sales will be largely influenced by carbonates, as they account for 92% of all US sales. The decline was not as harsh as 2009, as consumers started returning to restaurants and eating out as the economy showed signs of improvement.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Despite the slowdown in the overall juice category, private label juices managed a slight increase in off-trade and total volume and their off-trade value shares remained steady. Private label brands now account for 21% of total juice sales. Consumers are switching down to cheaper comparable products as major manufacturers, such as Coca-Cola with its Minute Maid brand and Tropicana, continue to increase unit price to offset rising production costs. The shift to private label brands combined with the price hikes led to a 1% increase in 2010 unit prices.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Coca-Cola Co leads total juice volume sales with a 20% share with its Minute Maid, Simply, and Odwalla brands. Coca-Cola has strategically positioned its similar juice products to attract different types of consumers. The Minute Maid brand is positioned to attract the general consumer, often being fortified with functional ingredients such as plant sterols for joint and heart health. Odwalla is its super-premium brand positioned to attract consumers who are concerned with both the environment and wellbeing. Its products are branded as earth-friendly and its smoothies use only naturally-healthy products, thus enabling it to charge a premium for them. The Simply brand is positioned for consumers who prefer fruit juice with no additives. In late 2009, Coca-Cola Co started to manufacture the Simply brand in a smaller size for convenience store sales. This placement has been a success as it opened up more distribution channels and helped to maintain Coca-Cola’s volume share in a disappointing year for juices. The smaller packaging size and increased distribution for Simply was a primary reason the company has an 18% share of off-trade value, posting a one percentage point gain in 2010.

PROSPECTS

  • Fruit/vegetable juice sales are projected to decline by 2% over the 2010-2015 forecast period, with total volume sales falling to 11.4 billion litres. High-sugar juices will continue to decline as consumers desire healthier products and functional ingredients. Stevia-sweetened nectars will help offset some of the decline, providing consumers with a naturally-sweetened juice product with fewer calories and less sugar than 100% juices. Meanwhile, juice drinks remain a popular product for convenience store purchases as parents see it as a better alternative than carbonated soda for their children to drink.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 1 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 2 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 3 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 4 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 5 Leading Flavours for 100% Juice: % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 6 Leading Flavours for Nectars (25-99% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 7 Leading Flavours for Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 8 Leading Flavours for Fruit-flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 9 % Share of Smoothies in 100% Juice and Nectars (25-99% Juice): Off-trade Value 2010
  • Table 10 Chilled Vs Ambient Reconstituted 100% Juice: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 11 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 12 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 13 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 14 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 15 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 16 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 17 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 18 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in the US - Company Profiles

Coca-Cola Co, The - Soft Drinks - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 3 Coca-Cola Co, The: Competitive Position 2010

Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc - Soft Drinks - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

  • Summary 6 Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc: Production Statistics 2008

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 7 Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc: Competitive Position 2010

Kraft Foods Inc - Soft Drinks - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 10 Kraft Foods Inc: Competitive Position 2010

PepsiCo Inc - Soft Drinks - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

  • Summary 13 PepsiCo Inc: Production Statistics 2010

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 14 PepsiCo Inc: Competitive Position 2010

Soft Drinks in the US - Industry Context

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Private label thrives as economy recovers

Health claims fall under increased scrutiny in 2010

Top companies look to non-carbonated soft drinks for growth

Supermarkets/Hypermarkets remains the favoured channel format

Health and wellness consumers to dictate growth

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Private label benefits from consumer frugality amidst slow economic recovery

Health claims of soft drinks under increased scrutiny

Natural sweeteners seek to replace high-fructose corn syrup

Coconut water eyed for potential growth

Childhood obesity a cause for concern

MARKET DATA

  • Table 19 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 20 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 21 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 22 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 23 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010
  • Table 24 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume 2010
  • Table 25 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010
  • Table 26 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value 2010
  • Table 27 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 28 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 29 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 30 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 31 Company Shares of Soft Drinks (RTD) by Total Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 32 Brand Shares of Soft Drinks (RTD) by Total Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 33 Company Shares of On-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 34 Brand Shares of On-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 35 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 36 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 37 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 38 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 39 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2006-2010
  • Table 40 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2007-2010
  • Table 41 Penetration of Private Label (as sold) by Category by Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 42 Penetration of Private Label by Category by Value 2005-2010
  • Table 43 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category and Distribution Format: % Analysis 2010
  • Table 44 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 45 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 46 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 47 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 48 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 49 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 50 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 51 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

APPENDIX

  • Table 52 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 53 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 54 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 55 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 56 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 57 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 58 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 59 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2010-2015

FOUNTAIN SALES IN THE US

Trends

  • Fountain on-trade volume sales declined by a little under 1% in 2010, falling to 12.7 billion litres. The decline was actually an improvement of the previous year’s performance. Total fountain sales will be largely influenced by carbonates, as they account for 92% of all US sales. The decline was not as harsh as 2009, as consumers started returning to restaurants and eating out as the economy showed signs of improvement.

DEFINITIONS

  • Summary 15 Research Sources

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Fruit/Vegetable Juice
    • 100% Juice
      • Frozen 100% Juice
      • Not from Concentrate 100% Juice
      • Reconstituted 100% Juice
    • Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice)
      • Frozen Juice Drinks
      • Juice Drinks Excluding Asian
    • Fruit-Flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content)
    • Nectars (25-99% Juice)
      • Frozen Nectars
      • Unfrozen Nectars

Statistics Included

Statistics Included

For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

From Passport

  • Market Sizes
  • Company Shares
  • Brand Shares
  • Distribution
  • Chilled v Ambient Juices
  • Flavours
  • Off-trade vs On-trade
  • Package Size
  • Packaging Type
  • Per Cent Share of Smoothies
  • Pricing
  • Products by Ingredient
  • Products by Ingredient

Market size details:

  • Retail Volume
  • Retail Volume % growth
  • Retail Volume per capita
  • Foodservice Volume
  • Foodservice Volume % growth
  • Foodservice Volume per capita
  • Total Volume
  • Total Volume % growth
  • Total Volume per capita
  • Retail Value retail selling price % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price % growth
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price % growth
  • Total Value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Total Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price % growth
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price % growth
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail RTD volume
  • Retail RTD volume % growth
  • Retail RTD volume per capita
  • Foodservice RTD volume
  • Foodservice RTD volume % growth
  • Foodservice RTD volume per capita
  • Total RTD volume
  • Total RTD volume % growth
  • Total RTD volume per capita
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through c-store
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through c-store % growth
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through c-store per capita
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through Foodservice
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through Foodservice % growth
  • Fountain on-trade Volume through Foodservice per capita
  • Total fountain on-trade Volume
  • Total fountain on-trade Volume % growth
  • Total fountain on-trade Volume per capita
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Total Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Foodservice Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Total Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY

Methodology

Methodology

Global insight and local knowledge

With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

Industry specialists

Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

Country and regional analysts

Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

In-country research network

To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

Research Methodology

Our research methods

Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

Desk research

With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

  • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
  • National and international trade press
  • National and international trade associations
  • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
  • Company financials and annual reports
  • Broker reports
  • Online databases
  • The financial, business and mainstream press

Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

Store checks

Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

  • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
  • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
  • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
  • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

Trade survey

Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

Trade surveys allow us to:

  • Fill gaps in available published data per company
  • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
  • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
  • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

Company analysis

At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

Forecasts

Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

Data validation

All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

Market analysis

Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

my pages

Want to find out more about this report?