You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesPackaged Food
print my pages

Country Report

Packaged Food in the US

Feb 2011

Price: $6,500

About this Report

About this Report

Delivery method: instant download
Report format: PDF doc_pdf.png (download a sample)
Market statistics: Excel workbook doc_excel_table.png (download a sample)

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Packaged Food industry in USA with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Packaged Food industry in USA, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in USA for free:

The Packaged Food in USA market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth  
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Packaged Food in USA?
  • What are the major brands in USA?
  • As economic prospects slowly improve, are consumers starting to eat out more and spending less time cooking at home?
  • How is private label performing in the wake of retail consolidation and the global economic hangover?
  • Do consumers want value for money or added value?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Packaged Food market research database.

Sample Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Moderate growth in 2010

In 2010, the US packaged food market experienced moderate value growth, similar to that of the previous year. However, the value growth rate for 2010 was lower than the average for the 2005-2010 review period as a whole which had been driven up by price increases taken in 2008. Commodity costs grew slightly in 2010 after rising sharply in 2008 and declining in 2009. Growth in 2010 was driven by consumers preparing more meals at home rather than going out to restaurants in response to a weak economy. Products offering convenience and health benefits such as frozen pizzas, fresh cut fruits, and nuts performed well in 2010.

Consumers worry about food safety

Consumer confidence in the safety of US food supply continued to be low in 2010. After the peanut butter recall of 2009, year 2010 brought news of a salmonella outbreak in the egg industry, tainted seafood caused by the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and infant formula recalls. Americans have long been sceptical that the underfunded Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can ensure the safety of the US food supply. To address consumer concerns and improve food safety, the FDA Food Safety Modernisation Act was signed into law on 4 January 2011. The act calls for 2,000 new FDA inspectors to be hired over the next four years and grants the FDA full recall authority.

Kraft and Nestlé expand

Kraft Foods Inc expanded its presence in confectionery when it completed its near US$20 billion purchase of Cadbury in February 2010. Despite protests from some shareholders, including billionaire Warren Buffet, the company purchased Cadbury in a bid to grow its global footprint and lessen its dependence on the US market. Kraft gains a number of well known confectionery brands including Cadbury Dairy Milk, Dentyne, and Halls but will still lag far behind the leaders. To help finance the Cadbury acquisition, Kraft sold its frozen pizza business to Nestlé in March 2010 for US$3.7 billion. Nestlé USA is now the leading player in US frozen pizza through the leading DiGiorno frozen pizza brand as well as other popular frozen pizza brands such as Tombstone and Jack’s.

Supermarkets face more competitors

While supermarket/hypermarkets remain the top choice among consumers for purchases of packaged food, other retailers are seeking out Americans’ food dollars. Drugstore chains CVS and Walgreens began to expand their food selections, especially in urban areas, in 2010 to leverage their convenient locations. To increase the frequency of its shopper visits, mass merchandiser Target rolled out its PFresh format to about 350 stores in 2010 after testing in 2008 and 2009. The PFresh stores offer fresh produce, frozen food, dairy products and dry groceries and are designed for “fill-in” trips. Supermarkets are also facing increased competition from discounters that carry fewer items and national brands than supermarkets but offer lower prices. Discounters Aldi and Save-A-Lot plan to open more stores in 2011, with Save-A-Lot announcing in October 2009 that it wanted to double its store count to 2,400 stores in five years.

Packaged food sales to slow down

The US economy is expected to show a recovery over the coming years. As employment levels go up and the housing market stabilises, consumers are expected to return to dining out and prepare fewer meals at home. As a result, packaged food sales are predicted to grow by a lower rate in 2010-2015 than it had experienced between 2005 and 2015. Products driving growth will be items that offer health benefits or convenience. Fresh cut fruits and nuts are expected to be some of the best growers as consumers gain greater awareness of the antioxidants and fibre benefits from consuming fruit and nuts. Frozen pizza and dips should do well as they meet consumer desires for quick and easy meal and snack options.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Packaged Food in the US - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Moderate growth in 2010

Consumers worry about food safety

Kraft and Nestlé expand

Supermarkets face more competitors

Packaged food sales to slow down

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Americans stay at home

Consumers lose confidence in food safety

Grocery retailers enter “food deserts”

Knowledge of health and wellness grows

MARKET DATA

  • Table 1 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 2 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 3 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 4 Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 5 GBO Shares of Packaged Food 2005-2009
  • Table 6 NBO Shares of Packaged Food 2005-2009
  • Table 7 NBO Brand Shares of Packaged Food 2006-2009
  • Table 8 Penetration of Private Label by Category 2005-2009
  • Table 9 Sales of Packaged Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 10 Sales of Packaged Food by Category and Distribution Format: % Analysis 2010
  • Table 11 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 12 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 13 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 14 Forecast Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

FOODSERVICE – KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Headlines

Trends

  • After a sharp decline in sales in 2009, the US foodservice industry began to show improvement in 2010. Americans reduced their visits to restaurants in 2009 as they sought to curb spending during an economic recession. Consumer confidence declined in 2009 due to a rise in unemployment levels and a weak housing market. While unemployment levels remained high in 2010, new jobs were created and equity stocks performed well leading affluent consumers to spend money again, including on dining out. Restaurant consumers of all income levels continued to look for “value” by trading down from full-service restaurants to fast food establishments, or switching from “value meals” to “dollar menu” items to save money, while still deriving the convenience of eating out. As restaurant visits grew in 2010, volume sales of most food categories sold to foodservice increased in 2010.

Competitive Landscape

  • The US foodservice industry is dominated by the four leading chain operators – McDonald’s Corp, Yum! Brands, Wendy’s/Arby’s Group and Burger King Holdings. Although consumers cut back on dining out, many of these companies offer value meals and low prices.

Prospects

  • Packaged food sales to foodservice are projected to grow by 5% in volume terms over the forecast period. The rate of growth is likely to be similar compared to the review period as consumers are expected to return to foodservice spending as the economy rebounds. Cost-conscious consumers cooked at home more during the recession to save money but many plan to resume dining out as their financial situation improves. Americans look to restaurants for both convenience (no need to do grocery shopping or meal preparation) as well as atmosphere and entertainment. Restaurants will need to offer value to consumers since consumers are looking for good prices.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 15 Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 16 Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 17 Forecast Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 18 Forecast Foodservice Sales of Packaged Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015

IMPULSE AND INDULGENCE PRODUCTS – KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Headlines

Trends

  • Despite growing consumer awareness of the inherent unhealthy aspects of many of their favourite indulgence products, Americans turned to them for “comfort” and convenience during the latest economic crisis. Many consumers stressed out by long working hours or high unemployment rates sought escape in a bag of potato crisps or in chocolate confectionery. Snack bars have become increasingly more fortified (including fibre, antioxidants, and protein) and these products are positioned as an affordable and convenient in-between meal or occasional meal replacement product. That said, the better performers in impulse and indulgence products such as snack bars and snack nuts sought to offer some redeeming health properties to allay consumer guilt about indulgence.

Competitive Landscape

  • Frito-Lay leads impulse and indulgence products with a 12% market value share in 2009, up from 11% in 2008. The company dominates chips/crisps and tortilla/corn chips where it controls more than three-quarters of product sales. It also holds a hefty share in extruded snacks, pretzels and other sweet and savoury snacks. Fruit snacks is the only category where Frito-Lay does not have a presence. The company has maintained market leadership through its robust distribution network, extensive advertising and product development that focuses on consumer trends. Frito-Lay heavily advertises its snacks brands and continually introduces new flavours to keep its core audience of young male snackers interested in its snacks. At the same time, the company boasts a selection of healthier snacks including baked varieties such as Baked Lay’s and Baked Tostitos to appeal to women and to older consumers.

Prospects

  • Offering health and value-added products is expected to be the main driving force behind impulse and indulgence products. The ageing of the US population creates a huge market of consumers who are very concerned about health issues, especially regarding sodium content. At the same time manufacturers must be careful when considering entry into the health and wellness arenas as consumers want taste first, and nutrition second. As such, companies must be careful to develop products that offer great taste, not just items that offer a long list of vitamin and mineral fortification.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 19 Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 20 Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 21 Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 22 Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 23 Company Shares of Impulse and Indulgence Products 2005-2009
  • Table 24 Brand Shares of Impulse and Indulgence Products 2006-2009
  • Table 25 Forecast Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 26 Forecast Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 27 Forecast Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 28 Forecast Sales of Impulse and Indulgence Products by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

NUTRITION/STAPLES – KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Headlines

Trends

  • To grow sales and compete against rivals, nutrition/staples companies are focusing on health and wellness initiatives. Yoghurt manufacturers opted for “light” yoghurts with 100 calories or less, those featuring probiotic cultures, and Greek yoghurts to appeal to health-conscious consumers. Companies have targeted older women to market their yoghurts by offering to aid digestive issues via probiotics (live, “friendly” bacteria) and weight-loss. Breakfast cereals, pasta and rice companies touted a whole-grain and fibre message.

Competitive landscape

  • Kraft Foods is the leading branded player in nutrition/staples. The company remains the king of cheese in the US, with a value share of 29% in 2009, down two percentage points from 2008. Kraft dominates processed cheese but has not been able to transfer its marketing expertise into the faster growing natural cheese market.

Prospects

  • An improving US economy is expected to lead to moderate 5% value growth for nutrition/staples over the 2010-2015 period. As the US economy pulls itself out of recession many consumers are expected to reduce cooking at home and resume eating out. However, this negative consumption trend will be balanced by growing consumer preference for healthier and higher quality foods. In terms of retail volume sales, many nutrition/staples are expected to show lower growth over the forecast period than they did during the review period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 29 Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 30 Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 31 Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 32 Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 33 Company Shares of Nutrition/Staples 2005-2009
  • Table 34 Brand Shares of Nutrition/Staples 2006-2009
  • Table 35 Forecast Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 36 Forecast Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 37 Forecast Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 38 Forecast Sales of Nutrition/Staples by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

MEAL SOLUTIONS – KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Headlines

Trends

  • Meal solutions grew by 2% in value terms in 2010. Growth was driven by consumers preparing more meals at home rather than going out to restaurants in response to a weak economy. Shoppers turned to meal solutions because the products offer consumers a speedy, easy way to prepare a meal. Americans have long working hours and commutes and a high rate of female participation in the labour force. In addition to feeling a “time crunch”, many in the younger generation would rather spend their leisure time watching TV or surfing the internet than on making meals from scratch. Younger Americans who have grown up with dual-working parents and heating snacks in microwave ovens are even more open to quick meal solutions as many of them lack culinary skills and appreciate pre-made products, such as sauces. The US recession prompted consumers to pack more lunches to work and school to save money. As a result, chilled processed meats continued to perform well in 2010 growing by 8% in value terms after growing by 8% in 2009.

Competitive Landscape

  • Kraft leads meal solutions with an 8% value share in 2009, unchanged from 2008. The company’s strength is tied to its leading position in ready meals, chilled processed food; and sauces, dressings, and condiments. Kraft is a leader in chilled processed food, where the company’s Oscar Meyer chilled processed meat brand is synonymous with America, hot dogs, and family. The company is also a major player in ready meals with its iconic Kraft Mac & Cheese brand, which is a staple easy-to-prepare “comfort” food. Kraft was the leading player in frozen pizza in 2009 where it offers a leading brand at every price point, including economy-priced Jack’s Pizza and premium-priced DiGiorno, which positions itself against delivery pizza. In March 2010 the company sold its frozen pizza business to Nestlé for US$3.7 billion. As a result, Nestlé will become the leading ready meals company while Kraft is likely to slide down to ninth place in 2010.

Prospects

  • Meal solutions is expected to grow by 6% in constant value terms over the forecast period. With recovery from the US economic recession, especially at the consumer level, still years away, consumers are expected to continue to look to home-prepared meals as a way to save money. Americans will want to economise by preparing meals at home but still want quick, easy meal solutions. Companies are expected to focus on health and wellness initiatives as well as introduce more ethnic varieties in order to appeal to a number of consumer segments. Ageing baby boomers will be increasingly targeted with reduced-sodium offerings driven by their concerns about the negative effects of sodium consumption (eg, high blood pressure and hypertension). Lower-fat products are also expected to underpin growth through healthier offerings. For example, within salad dressings, lower-calorie vinaigrettes are expected to be one of the strongest performers in sauces, dressings and condiments. Companies will introduce more organic varieties to appeal to the growing desire for spicier and unusual foods.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 39 Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 40 Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 41 Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 42 Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 43 Company Shares of Meal Solutions 2005-2009
  • Table 44 Brand Shares of Meal Solutions 2006-2009
  • Table 45 Forecast Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 46 Forecast Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 47 Forecast Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 48 Forecast Sales of Meal Solutions by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

DEFINITIONS

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Packaged Food in the US - Company Profiles

Campbell Foodservice Co - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

Chiquita Brands Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 6 Chiquita Brands Inc: Competitive Position 2009

ConAgra Foods Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 9 ConAgra: Competitive Position 2009

Dole Food Co Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 12 Dole Food Co Inc: Competitive Position 2009

Frito-Lay Co - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 15 Frito-Lay Co: Competitive Position 2009

General Mills Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 18 General Mills Inc: Competitive Position 2009

Heinz Foodservice - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

Hormel Foods Corp - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 23 Hormel Foods Corp: Competitive Position 2009

JM Smucker Co, The - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 26 JM Smucker Co: Competitive Position 2009

Kraft Foods Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 29 Kraft Foods Inc: Competitive Position 2009

Mars Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 31 Mars Inc: Competitive Position 2009
  • Summary 32 Uncle Ben’s Inc: Competitive Position 2009
  • Summary 33 Wrigley Jr Co, William: Competitive Position 2009

Nestlé USA Inc - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 36 Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Holdings: Competitive Position 2009
  • Summary 37 Gerber Products Co: Competitive Position 2009
  • Summary 38 Nestlé USA Inc: Competitive Position 2009
  • Summary 39 PowerBar Inc: Competitive Position 2009

Sara Lee Foodservice - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

Schwan Food Co, The - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 43 Schwan Food Co: Competitive Position 2009

Unilever Foodsolutions - Packaged Food - USA

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

Baby Food in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of baby food will decline by 2% in value terms in 2010. This decline reflects a change from the positive 2% review period CAGR. Much of the value decline was due to the 6% decrease in sales of milk formula in 2010. A slowdown in birth rates, a trend towards breastfeeding, and a change in the WIC programme contributed to reduced sales of milk formula. The weak economy with high unemployment rates has led some Americans to postpone having children until they are more confident about economic prospects.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • New product activity was strong in organic baby foods and baby foods for toddlers. A new organic baby food line was launched in 2009 – Sprout. Sprout has the advantage of name recognition through the involvement of celebrity chef Tyler Florence of The Food Network. Florence as executive chef and co-founder helped develop the line and launched it nationally in 2009. Organic baby food makers Nurture Inc and Plum Organics introduced new varieties in 2009 and 2010. In spring 2010 Nurture Inc introduced HAPPYBABY HAPPYTOT toddler meals with Salba. The company claims that Salba is a “super-grain” with a lot of omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and more calcium than milk. Nurture Inc introduced HAPPYMELTS, a freeze-dried yoghurt snack that contains prebiotics and probiotics, in August 2009. After being acquired by The Nest Collective in February 2009, the frozen baby food company introduced baby food in lightweight, resealable pouches (Mish Mash fruit purees, fruits, blends) as Fiddlesticks (gluten-free fruit & grain snack sticks) and Fruity Fingerfuls (freeze dried fruit & grain bites) later in the year. In 2010 Hain Celestial added Earth’s Best Whole Grain Infant Cereals with fruit and Third Foods Vegetable Medleys, and Sesame Street Organic Mini Meals.

PROSPECTS

  • Value sales for total baby food are projected to grow by 4% in constant terms from 2010 to 2015. Birth rates are expected to go up during the forecast period as the economy improves and Americans become more confident about future prospects. Higher birth rates should aid volume sales of many baby foods. More babies mean that value sales of milk formula are expected to grow by 4% over the time period while the trend towards breastfeeding continues strong. At the same time, retail volume sales of prepared baby food are projected to grow by only 7% over the forecast period in contrast to the 18% growth of the review period as the big change in WIC programme allotment effective from October 2009, has passed.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 49 Sales of Baby Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 50 Sales of Baby Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 51 Sales of Baby Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 52 Sales of Baby Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 53 Soy-based Vs Dairy-based Special Baby Milk Formula % Breakdown 2010
  • Table 54 Baby Food Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 55 Baby Food Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 56 Sales of Baby Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 57 Forecast Sales of Baby Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 58 Forecast Sales of Baby Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 59 Forecast Sales of Baby Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 60 Forecast Sales of Baby Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Baked Goods in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • A developing recession and volatility in unit prices hampered volume sales of baked goods in 2007 and 2008, but since that time, the category has slowly started to recover as the cost of commodities for producing baked goods have been far less intense. While consumers have remained cautious about spending, bread grew as consumers stayed in or brown-bagged their lunches rather than dining out, while cakes grew as consumers enjoyed a sweet, indulgent treat, although a little more sporadically.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Nearly half of all retail value sales of the baked goods environment was accounted for by artisanal products in 2009, as these continued to be preferred by consumers to packaged brands for their freshness, variety and perceived higher quality. Private label products followed with 14% of baked goods’ retail sales value in 2009, indicating that consumers also purchase breads and other baked goods based on value, and do not necessarily stay loyal to national brands, especially during tough economic times. In early 2009 the largest US convenience store retailer, 7-Eleven, introduced 15 new private label products within the baked goods environment under its 7-Eleven Select private label brand.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of baked goods are forecast to grow 2% in constant terms over 2010-15 to reach over US$47.3 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to decrease 4% over the same period. Contributing to the decline in retail volume sales is the anticipation that demand for bread is expected to decrease again as the economy improves, and consumers show more willingness to dine out.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 61 Sales of Baked Goods by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 62 Sales of Baked Goods by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 63 Sales of Baked Goods by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 64 Sales of Baked Goods by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 65 Packaged/Industrial Bread by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 66 Unpackaged/Artisanal Bread: In-store Bakery Sales 2005-2010
  • Table 67 Pastries by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 68 Packaged/Industrial Cakes: Single Portion vs Multi-pack % Breakdown by Type 2005-2010
  • Table 69 Baked Goods Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 70 Baked Goods Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 71 Sales of Baked Goods by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 72 Forecast Sales of Baked Goods by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 73 Forecast Sales of Baked Goods by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 74 Forecast Sales of Baked Goods by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 75 Forecast Sales of Baked Goods by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Biscuits in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The savoury biscuits and crackers niche is expected to demonstrate the strongest growth in 2010 with an increase of 2% in current value terms to reach over US$5.1 billion. Savoury biscuits and crackers remains the largest niche within the biscuits environment, comprising nearly 45% of retail value sales in 2010. The product category has taken advantage of being perceived as a healthier snacking option (including wholegrain and low-sodium versions) sought by more consumers while also benefiting from the ability to be consumed at home or on-the-go.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kraft remained the leader of the biscuits category in 2009 with a retail value share of 43%. Kraft’s Nabisco division produces some of the best-known names in the business, including Honey Maid Grahams, Chips Ahoy!, Oreo and Newtons, each of which lead their respective categories. Kraft has successfully introduced extensions and new varieties of several of its well-known branded products. One of these extensions included the Oreo Fun Stix, launched in March 2009, which is Oreo-flavoured wafer rolls that can be used as a straw for drinking milk or eaten as a snack.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of biscuits are forecast to grow 2% in constant terms over 2010-15 to reach nearly US$11.7 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to increase 3% over the same period. Savoury biscuits and crackers are projected to primarily drive growth in both retail volume and retail value terms as the product category continues to benefit from taking a more healthful snack positioning. Whole grains, fibre and low-sodium are just some of the factors being promoted by manufacturers.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 76 Sales of Biscuits by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 77 Sales of Biscuits by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 78 Sales of Biscuits by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 79 Sales of Biscuits by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 80 Biscuits Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 81 Biscuits Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 82 Sales of Biscuits by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 83 Forecast Sales of Biscuits by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 84 Forecast Sales of Biscuits by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 85 Forecast Sales of Biscuits by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 86 Forecast Sales of Biscuits by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Breakfast Cereals in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The leading manufacturers of breakfast cereals remain keen on health and wellness trends in the US. Fortifying breakfast cereals with vitamins, whole grains and fibre continue in 2010 as manufacturers seek to meet the demands of consumers. Marketing efforts through advertising and packaging point out the ways in which breakfast cereals can meet nutritional needs, and in some cases, provide additional health benefits such as reducing cholesterol or boosting immunity. However, challenges have been made to some of those health benefits, and manufacturers have responded in various ways.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kellogg Co held on to its leading position within the breakfast cereals environment with a retail value share of 30% in 2009. Kellogg’s health and wellness trends continued into 2009. In May of that year the company released a study that nine in 10 Americans – both adults and children – were not eating an adequate amount of fibre in their diet. Consequently, Kellogg announced that it was fortifying fibre in many of its cereals, with the goal of having 80% of its cereals portfolio being “good to excellent” sources of fibre. Brands including children’s cereals Apple Jacks and Fruit Loops now tout the fibre content on their respective packaging.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of breakfast cereals are forecast to grow by 3% in constant terms over 2010-15 to reach US$10.5 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to decrease marginally over the same period. Demand for breakfast cereals remains consistent despite various improvements and innovations. Consumers of breakfast cereals will continue to enjoy the affordability, convenience and health options that breakfast cereals provide.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 87 Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 88 Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 89 Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 90 Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 91 Breakfast Cereals Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 92 Breakfast Cereals Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 93 Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 94 Forecast Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 95 Forecast Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 96 Forecast Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 97 Forecast Sales of Breakfast Cereals by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Canned/Preserved Food in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of canned/preserved food are expected to grow by 1% in current value terms in 2010 to reach US$19.3 billion. Retail volume sales are set grow by 2% in the same year in contrast to the 1% average volume decline seen in the review period. Consumers purchased more canned/preserved food as they looked to make lower-cost meals at home in response to the economic downturn.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Campbell Soup Co leads canned/preserved food through its dominance of canned/preserved soup. The company saw its value share of canned/preserved decline from 14.5% in 2008 to 14.2% in 2009. Its value share declined despite the success of its newer reduced-sodium soups. The soup maker has invested in an extensive advertising campaign to persuade consumers that its new technology, which uses sea salt, offers a taste similar to that of regular soup.

PROSPECTS

  • Canned/preserved food is expected to decline by 1% in constant value terms over the forecast period, with sales reaching US$19.1 billion in 2015. Retail volume sales on the other hand are projected to decline by slightly over 4% – slightly higher than the volume decline rate witnessed during the review period. Demand for canned/preserved food is expected to see an overall volume decline once the economy recovers as consumers seek out fresher and healthier alternatives such as fresh cut fruits and frozen ready meals.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 98 Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 99 Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 100 Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 101 Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 102 Canned/Preserved Food Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 103 Canned/Preserved Food Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 104 Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 105 Forecast Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 106 Forecast Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 107 Forecast Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 108 Forecast Sales of Canned/Preserved Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 45 Other Canned/Preserved Food: Product Types

Cheese in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Cheese prices rose again in 2010 after declining in 2009. The US fresh milk market has experienced strong price fluctuations during the last four years of the review period. After rising sharply in 2007 and 2008 due to higher corn feed prices and higher worldwide demand for milk, milk prices declined in 2009 due to oversupply. In 2010 milk prices rose again as the milk supply was reduced. As a result, cheese producers passed on some of the increase in milk prices by raising cheese prices.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kraft Foods Inc leads cheese sales with a value share of 29%, down two percentage points from 2008. The company owes its position to its dominance in processed cheese. Kraft has a smaller presence in unprocessed cheese. The company is known for its Kraft Singles processed cheese slices and its Kraft Philadelphia cream cheese. Kraft’s biggest competitor is private label which has improved quality and variety over the years. The company has not been able to become a powerhouse in unprocessed cheese. It faces numerous competitors in unprocessed cheese ranging from Sargento to artisanal cheese producers and imported cheeses.

PROSPECTS

  • Demand for cheese is expected to continue growing over the forecast period. Value sales of cheese are expected to rise by 9% in constant terms over the forecast period, a higher rate than over the 2005-2010 period. Retail volume sales of cheese are projected to grow by 6% between 2010 and 2015, higher than the 5% growth rate of the review period. Unit prices are expected to grow at a slower pace over the forecast period than during the review period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 109 Sales of Cheese by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 110 Sales of Cheese by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 111 Sales of Cheese by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 112 Sales of Cheese by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 113 Spreadable Processed Cheese by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 114 Unprocessed Cheese by Type: % Value Breakdown 2009-2010
  • Table 115 Cheese Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 116 Cheese Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 117 Sales of Cheese by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 118 Forecast Sales of Cheese by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 119 Forecast Sales of Cheese by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 120 Forecast Sales of Cheese by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 121 Forecast Sales of Cheese by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Chilled Processed Food in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Demand for chilled processed food is expected to grow slightly in 2010, with value sales set to be up by 2% whilst retail volume sales grows by 0.5%. The 2% value gain is in line with the review period average whilst the 0.5% volume gain is higher than the 0.1% average for the review period. Growth in chilled foods was driven by the weak economy, which led consumers to continue eating at home and bringing lunches to work.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kraft Foods Inc dominates chilled processed foods through leadership of chilled processed meats. The company owes its leading position to the Oscar Mayer brand, which has become synonymous with chilled processed meat products in the minds of American consumers. The brand’s ‘Oscar Mayer Wiener’ jingle and ‘Wienermobile’, a hot dog-shaped car, are cultural icons. The company’s Oscar Mayer brand is America’s best selling frankfurter, bacon and lunch meat. Similarly, its Lunchables lunch kit has a dominant share of chilled lunch kit value sales, 77% in 2009. After losing sales in 2007 and 2008, the iconic Lunchables brand grew its sales in 2009. Oscar Mayer Lunchables, which largely appeals to children, had struggled of late due to the product’s dubious health qualities and relatively high price. But in 2009 the brand gained sales, partly due to the addition of new products in the line which now feature spring water, bread made with whole grains, and applesauce. As a result, the nutritional profile of Lunchables was slightly improved to have fewer calories to help alleviate parental guilt about packing Lunchables in their children’s lunchboxes. In 2010 the company introduced a chicken strips variety with mandarin oranges which they advertised as containing one serving of fruit. Meanwhile Oscar Mayer Deli Creations, Kraft’s recently launched adult version of the Lunchables brand has been moderately successful. The product includes bread, sliced meat, cheese and sauce and is designed to be heated up in the microwave. It capitalises on the toasted sandwich trend in US consumer foodservice and appeals to the many American consumers who have less than two minutes to prepare lunch.

PROSPECTS

  • Chilled processed food volumes are forecast to grow by 5% over the forecast period. This volume growth will be driven by sales of fresh cut fruits and chilled soup, which are forecast to grow by 15% and 12% between 2010 and 2015. In contrast, sales of chilled processed meats, which make up 78% of total sector retail volume are predicted to grow by a lower 5% in the same time period. Volume sales of chilled processed food are expected to outperform the 1% volume growth of the 2005-2010 period as the US economy recovers to allow consumers to buy value-added products such as fresh cut fruits and chilled soups which cost more than alternatives such as fresh fruit and canned soups. In value terms, sales of chilled processed food are projected to grow by 7% to reach US$28.8 billion by the end of 2015.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 122 Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 123 Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 124 Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 125 Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 126 Chilled Processed Meat by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 127 Chilled Processed Meat: % Share of Chilled Meat Substitute 2005-2010
  • Table 128 Chilled Processed Food Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 129 Chilled Processed Food Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 130 Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 131 Forecast Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 132 Forecast Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 133 Forecast Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 134 Forecast Sales of Chilled Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Chocolate Confectionery in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • According to data from the International Cocoa Organisation the price of cocoa in US dollars per tonne was up 12% in current terms in 2009, and as of June 2010 the price was up another 13%. In April 2010 supermarket retailer Supervalu Inc was the most recent of retailers to file a class action lawsuit against manufacturers of chocolate confectionery over claims that these manufacturers, which include Mars Inc, The Hershey Co, Cadbury PLC and Nestlé SA, have colluded to engage in price fixing. Other retailers which previously made similar accusations include Kroger Co, Safeway Inc and CVS Corp. Consumers as well as various country regulatory agencies have also either filed suits or made enquiries regarding the potential price fixing. At the time of writing there is no proof of collusion, but since 2007 unit prices of chocolate confectionery have increased 29% in current terms, while retail volume decreased by 16% over that same period.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Mars Inc and The Hershey Co are the clear leaders in chocolate confectionery, each holding a retail value share of more than 33% in 2009. Hershey benefited from increased marketing spend, including both advertising and trade promotions, as well as streamlining its operations – a process which began in early 2007 and was completed in 2009. Hershey was rumoured to be interested in the purchase of Cadbury, but in January 2010 it issued a statement that it was not interested.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of chocolate confectionery are forecast to grow 7% in constant terms over 2010-15 to reach almost US$19 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to grow 1% over the same period. Unit prices are expected to level off over the forecast period as sharp year-on-year increases to cocoa prices are likely to subside. Furthermore, the threats from governments and the public via regulatory issues, and multiple class action lawsuits against chocolate confectionery manufacturers, could make manufacturers more conscious regarding further price increases.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 135 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 136 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 137 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 138 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 139 Chocolate Tablets by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 140 Chocolate Confectionery Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 141 Chocolate Confectionery Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 142 Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 143 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 144 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 145 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 146 Forecast Sales of Chocolate Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Dried Processed Food in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Value sales of dried processed food grew at a slower rate in 2010 than in 2009 as rice and wheat prices stabilised in 2010. Price increases for rice and wheat had contributed to a 5% value sales increase for dried processed food in 2009. In 2010 value sales are expected to increase by a smaller 3% to reach US$11.9 billion. The trend of consumers eating and cooking at home continued to benefit dried processed food in 2010.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kraft Foods Inc leads dried processed food in the US because of its dominant presence in dried ready meals and dessert mixes. Kraft held the number one position with 12% of value sales in 2009. The company’s Kraft Macaroni and Cheese is a popular ‘comfort food’ favourite for children and adults alike. Kraft’s products offer consumers a trusted brand name, value-for-money pricing and satisfying family meals. These characteristics have been especially appealing during difficult economic times. To maintain sales momentum, the company is now seeking to persuade adults to eat more Kraft Macaroni and Cheese with a new, ‘You know you love it’ slogan’ and new products. Kraft introduced a new Homestyle version that comes with wider noodles; a creamier, cheesier sauce; and breadcrumbs. The three Homestyle varieties were launched in June 2010 and marketed with a Homestyle Macaroni & Cheese Tour that travelled to several locations including the Iowa and Wisconsin State Fairs to offer samples.

PROSPECTS

  • Dried processed food sales are predicted to slow down in the forecast period coming off a period of strong growth. Unless the US economy experiences another recession in the next five years, it will be difficult for dried processed food to match the 6% retail volume growth of the 2005-2010 period. Instead, dried processed food is projected to grow by 2% in retail volume terms from 2010-2015. Dried processed food value sales are projected to grow by 3% to reach US$12.3 billion by the end of 2015. Much of the positive traction in dried processed food in 2009 and 2010 was due to consumers cooking at home more often and rising commodity prices passed on to consumers. As the economy rebounds, consumers will slowly return to dining out, resulting in less growth in this sector. Americans are expected to bake at home less often as well, leading to a 10% retail volume decline for dessert mixes.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 147 Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 148 Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 149 Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 150 Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 151 Dried Processed Food Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 152 Dried Processed Food Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 153 Sales of Dried Processed Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 154 Forecast Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 155 Forecast Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 156 Forecast Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 157 Forecast Sales of Dried Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Drinking Milk Products in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Fresh/pasteurised milk prices rose by 4% in 2010 after declining by 15%, in 2009. The US fresh milk market has experienced strong price fluctuations during the last four years of the review period. Fresh milk prices rose sharply in 2007 and 2008 due to higher corn feed prices and higher worldwide demand for milk. In 2009 milk prices tumbled as the weakened global economy reduced demand for milk outside the US. The glut of milk led to lower milk prices in 2009 and the slaughter of dairy cows on farms. 2009 was a difficult year for dairy farmers because they received lower prices for their milk while still facing high prices for corn and soybean feed. To deal with this loss-making situation, many dairy farmers decided to sell or in dire circumstances, slaughter their dairy cows. Then, in 2010 the oversupply situation corrected itself as there were fewer dairy cows and less milk being produced on US dairy farms. As a result, value sales of drinking milk products grew by 0.5% in 2010 after declining by 12% in 2009. The 0.5% value growth is an improvement on the review period which saw sales decline slightly.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Dean Foods Co is the leading branded milk producer, with a 15% value share in 2009, unchanged from 2008. The company has become the dominant force in branded milk through acquisitions, product development, and marketing efforts. Dean Foods is one of the few national players in milk as most other branded milk is sold by regional dairies. To compete better against rivals, especially private label producers, Dean Foods Co continues to introduce new value-added varieties. In summer 2009, the company introduced Silk Heart Health with added plant sterols that claims to help reduce cholesterol levels by 7% in four weeks.

PROSPECTS

  • Drinking milk product sales are not expected to perform well over the forecast period. Value sales of drinking milk products are forecast to be flat between 2010 and 2015, which is a reversal from the 9% constant value decline of the review period. The US has very high per capita consumption of fluid milk so volume growth prospects are negative without a population boom. Sales of fresh/pasteurised milk are forecast to decline by 2% in retail volume terms between 2010 and 2015. The forecast rate of volume decline is in contrast to the 1% volume growth of the review period, with consumers continuing to move away from milk in favour of other products, such as bottled water and energy drinks. Value gains are not expected during the forecast period, as dairy prices are expected to grow at a slower rate than over the review period. Unit price growth is expected to be constrained due to a continued decline in milk exports, as the world economy takes a few years to make a full recovery before resuming its demand for dairy products.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 158 Sales of Drinking Milk Products by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 159 Sales of Drinking Milk Products by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 160 Sales of Drinking Milk Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 161 Sales of Drinking Milk Products by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 162 Chilled Vs Ambient Flavoured Milk Drinks: % Volume Analysis 2007-2010
  • Table 163 Milk by Type: % Value Breakdown 2007-2010
  • Table 164 Drinking Milk Products Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 165 Drinking Milk Products Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 166 Sales of Drinking Milk Products by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 167 Forecast Sales of Drinking Milk Products Products by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 168 Forecast Sales of Drinking Milk Products Products by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 169 Forecast Sales of Drinking Milk Products Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 170 Forecast Sales of Drinking Milk Products Products by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Frozen Processed Food in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • With consumers continuing to seek value and convenience, frozen processed foods experienced yet another year of retail value sales growth in current value terms in 2010. Whilst manufacturers continued to offer up staple frozen processed foods products like frozen pizza and frozen chicken wings, consumer demands towards healthier options and bolder flavours have led to modified or new products that offer such features as gluten-free or sauces made from various herbs and spices. Also, similar to other foods, organic and natural varieties are being increasingly offered.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Nestlé USA Inc continued to lead the frozen processed food sector amongst major companies in 2009. Nestlé’s popular Hot Pockets, Lean Pockets and Stouffer’s brands all have a strong presence in frozen processed food and help sustain Nestlé USA’s position. Nestlé USA’s value share will increase in 2010 and beyond now that the parent company completed its US$3.7 billion acquisition of the frozen pizza division of Kraft Foods Inc in March 2010. The brand portfolio now includes the leading DiGiorno frozen pizza brand as well as other popular frozen pizza brands such as Tombstone and Jack’s.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of frozen processed food are expected to grow by 9% in constant terms from 2010 to 2015 to reach over US$36.8 billion whilst retail volume sales are expected to grow by 7% over the same time period. Unit prices are expected to remain relatively flat over the forecast period as increasing competition, especially from private label brands, puts downward pressure on pricing.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 171 Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 172 Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 173 Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 174 Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 175 Frozen Processed Red Meat by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 176 Frozen Processed Poultry by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 177 Frozen Processed Fish/Seafood by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 178 Frozen Processed Vegetables by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 179 Other Frozen Processed Food by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 180 Frozen Processed Food Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 181 Frozen Processed Food Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 182 Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 183 Forecast Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 184 Forecast Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 185 Forecast Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 186 Forecast Sales of Frozen Processed Food by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 46 Other Frozen Processed Food: Product Types

Gum in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • With benefits such as breath freshening, teeth whitening, saliva stimulation, and being a low- or no-calorie treat, gum continues to make year-on-year gains in retail value sales. Retail sales of sugar-free gum continue to lead the gum sector in 2009, but another year of declining retail sales of sugarised gum and bubble gum offset further gains for overall gum growth. Manufacturers have also been aggressive in rolling out new flavours of sugar-free gum, which has helped keep the category fresh.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Mars Inc was previously virtually non-existent in the US gum industry, but has become the leading company since 2008 when it completed the purchase of William Wrigley Jr Co in a US$23 billion deal. Mars retained its leading position with a retail value share of 46% in 2009. One of the brands that has fared quite well since its launch in 2007 is the Wrigley’s 5. In the spring of 2009 the brand added two new flavours, Solstice and Zing, with the former providing a “warm and cool winter” flavour and the latter providing a “sour to sweet bubble”. In March 2010 two more flavours were added: React Mint and React Fruit. Wrigley claims that the “react” aspect to this gum is based on the fact that the flavour provides different tastes to different people, and thus “reacts” in different ways based on the user.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail sales of gum are forecast to grow 9% in constant value terms over 2010-15 to reach just over US$5 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to increase by 3% over the same period. Unit prices are projected to steady as commodity prices, though difficult to predict, are not expected to be as volatile as they were in the latter portion of the review period. Sugar-free gum is the only product category within the gum environment expected to perform well, as bubble gum and sugarised gum show little sign of reversing their respective declines.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 187 Sales of Gum by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 188 Sales of Gum by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 189 Sales of Gum by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 190 Sales of Gum by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 191 Leading Flavours for Gum 2005-2010
  • Table 192 Gum Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 193 Gum Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 194 Sales of Gum by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 195 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 196 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 197 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 198 Forecast Sales of Gum by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Ice Cream in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Hot weather during summer 2010 is helping boost demand for ice cream parlours and impulse ice cream sales in 2010. Summer (June through August) 2010 was the fourth hottest summer on record according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA). In turn, consumers decided to treat themselves to cool ice cream treats to cool down, benefiting sales of most ice cream products. The abnormally hot weather of summer 2010 followed a cold summer in 2009. Increased demand for ice cream parlours and impulse ice cream which carry higher prices than ice cream as a whole should lead to a 3% value sales gain in 2010, higher than the 1.5% review period average. At the same time, retail volume sales of ice cream are expected to be flat in 2010; a better performance than the negative 3% review period average.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Holdings Inc leads US ice cream with a 21% share of retail value sales in 2009. The Nestlé SA subsidiary has been able to dominate US ice cream with constant product innovation and a nationwide direct store delivery (DSD) network. The company’s leading brand Dreyer’s/Edy’s built a lead in the category with the 2004 introduction of Dreyer’s/Edy’s Slow Churned Light, a lower-fat ice cream that mimicked the flavour of a regular ice cream. But soon after similar low-fat products were introduced by Unilever and other rivals. Dreyer’s also does well with its limited-edition flavours such as eggnog and peppermint under its Dreyer’s/Edy’s brands.

PROSPECTS

  • Consumer demand for ice cream is expected to be minimal during the forecast period. Value sales of ice cream are predicted to grow by 3% in constant terms through 2015 while retail volume sales are expected to grow by 1%. The 1% volume growth rate is an improvement over the -2% volume decline over the review period. Americans are expected to move back towards premium ice cream as the economy makes a slow recovery. An improving economy should also aid sales through ice cream parlours.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 199 Sales of Ice Cream by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 200 Sales of Ice Cream by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 201 Sales of Ice Cream by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 202 Sales of Ice Cream by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 203 Leading Flavours for Ice Cream 2005-2010
  • Table 204 Ice Cream Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 205 Ice Cream Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 206 Impulse Ice Cream Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 207 Impulse Ice Cream Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 208 Take-home Ice Cream Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 209 Take-home Ice Cream Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 210 Sales of Ice Cream by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 211 Forecast Sales of Ice Cream by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 212 Forecast Sales of Ice Cream by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 213 Forecast Sales of Ice Cream by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 214 Forecast Sales of Ice Cream by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Meal Replacement in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • In the US the meal replacement products category includes convalescence products that help people replace solid foods. These products are largely consumed by older adults who have difficulty eating solid foods. Such offerings are designed to help these consumers maintain a proper nutritional and caloric intake. Some young adults also buy these products as a convenient, affordable and portable breakfast or lunch replacement. The category was rather static over the review period, with limited innovation.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Abbott Nutrition led meal replacement products at the end of the review period with a 14% value share in 2009. The company’s strength is tied to its near monopoly hold on the US convalescence market, where it accounts for more than two-thirds of all sales. The company’s Ensure brand is synonymous with liquid meal replacement products and faces little competition on store shelves.

PROSPECTS

  • The demand for weight loss treatments is expected to remain strong over the forecast period. The latest statistics from the CDC suggest that US obesity rates stabilised in 2006 with over 34% of adults being obese but the rates remain dangerously high. Similarly, the amount of overweight individuals remains high. According to the Calorie Control Council, 29% of US adults were on a diet in 2007, but the obesity and overweight rates were barely altered. According to the same study, 58% of consumers admit that they do not exercise enough, while 49% lack the self discipline required to lose weight. Despite increased consumer awareness and a desire to lower their weight, real sustainable weight loss remains a frustrating challenge for most consumers. With so many overweight people who want to lose weight but are struggling, products that can successfully deliver sustained weight loss can benefit substantially.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 215 Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 216 Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 217 Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 218 Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 219 Meal Replacement Slimming by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 220 Meal Replacement Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 221 Meal Replacement Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 222 Sales of Meal Replacement by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 223 Forecast Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 224 Forecast Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 225 Forecast Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 226 Forecast Sales of Meal Replacement by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Noodles in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Noodles are traditionally targeted towards Asian-Americans, yet they are beginning to expand beyond their initial consumer base. As knowledge of Asian culture increased through the Beijing Olympic Games and a general familiarity with different Asian cuisines, such flavours are becoming more commonplace. Home cooks of all ethnicities, eager to bring such flavours into their homes, are creating a market for both plain and refrigerated noodles. In contrast, instant noodles have found a niche as an extremely economical and convenient meal, particularly among college students, single males and Hispanic-Americans. In the hope of further expanding the presence of noodles in American households, manufacturers are beginning to take instant bowl/cup noodles ‘upscale’ by including them alongside dried/preserved ready meals. Such ‘premium’ products, although only slightly more expensive than ramen noodles, are beginning to broaden the appeal of instant noodles beyond their core market.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Three Japanese instant noodle manufacturers dominate noodles, with a combined 40% value share in 2009. These three companies accounted for around 70% of the popular instant noodles category. Toyo Suisan Kaish, with its category-dominant Maruchan brand, remained the leader in noodles in 2009, with an 18% value share. Maruchan, accounting for the majority of Toyo Suisan Kaisha’s sales, is associated entirely with the extreme value segment of instant noodles, as its pouch and cups/bowl noodles are consistently amongst the cheapest branded instant noodle products. The company also markets a slightly higher-priced Yakisoba brand. Number two player Nissin Foods USA has a wider portfolio of brands, which gives the company a combined 13% value share, although the largest of these brands, Nissin, accounts for only 7% of noodles value sales. However, the company took a different strategy, focusing on driving growth through value-added products such as the Chow Mein and Bowl Noodles brands.

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, growth is expected to be mainly price-driven, with sales of noodles increasing at a CAGR of 2% in constant value terms. Value growth will be driven by price increases, as manufacturers attempt to introduce more value-added products, and attempt to increase modestly the price of basic instant noodles. Instant noodles, which make up the bulk of sales in the category, is approaching maturity, as the product has already achieved very high household penetration amongst its core user group of extremely value-conscious and cooking-challenged consumers. Meanwhile, plain noodles remains largely undeveloped beyond the core group of Asian consumers, but is likely to gain popularity as more non-Asian-Americans experiment with Asian flavours, and use plain noodles as a base ingredient in a variety of Asian-style meals.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 227 Sales of Noodles by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 228 Sales of Noodles by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 229 Sales of Noodles by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 230 Sales of Noodles by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 231 Leading Instant Noodle Flavours 2005-2010
  • Table 232 Noodles Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 233 Noodles Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 234 Sales of Noodles by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 235 Forecast Sales of Noodles by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 236 Forecast Sales of Noodles by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 237 Forecast Sales of Noodles by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 238 Forecast Sales of Noodles by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Oils and Fats in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Value sales of oils and fats experienced a 3% decline in 2010 after years of growth. The 3% value sales decline is in contrast to the 2% review period CAGR which was boosted by a 13% gain in 2008. In 2008, sales jumped due to a steep price increase in oils and fats. With prices coming down in 2009 and 2010, value sales will decline in 2010. Retail volume sales also declined by 1% in 2010. Demand for oils and fats declined slightly in 2010 after growing by 0.5% in 2009. While consumers seek to save money by eating at home, they are also turning to meal solutions such as frozen pizzas and frozen ready meals which usually do not need the addition of oils and fats.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Unilever United States Inc is the largest player in oils and fats, with a 13% value share in 2009. The company leads in margarine and spreadable oils and fats, with its Shedd’s Spread Country Crock, I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter!, Imperial, Brummel & Brown, and Take Control brands. Unilever promotes its Shedd’s Spread Country Crock brand as a healthy brand for the family. Its Country Crock Calcium Plus Vitamin D variety appeals to parents because many children often do not consume enough of the recommended intake of calcium and vitamin D. The company markets its I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter as a tasty and fun brand. During autumn 2009 Unilever introduced an advertising campaign starring Megan Mullally of “Will & Grace” that features her dancing in the supermarket aisle in the video “Turn the Tub Around”.

PROSPECTS

  • Demand for oils and fats is expected to continue to decline, with retail volume sales expected to drop by 3% from 2010 to 2015. Margarine and regular spreadable oils and fats are expected to continue losing sales, as a growing emphasis on health leads to increased sales of olive oil and functional spreadable oils and fats. Butter should see increased volume sales over the forecast period as it benefits from the current trend of “pure”, simple products. A weak economy is expected to contribute to more consumers eating at home. As a result, retail volume sales are expected to decline by a smaller figure than the 7% decline recorded over the review period. As in the review period, value growth will be positive, as average unit prices are expected to remain flat. In addition to high-priced olive oils driving up unit prices, functional spreadable oils and fats feature more ingredients, prompting manufacturers to pass on some of those input costs to consumers.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 239 Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 240 Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 241 Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 242 Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 243 Vegetable and Seed Oil by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 244 Oils and Fats Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 245 Oils and Fats Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 246 Sales of Oils and Fats by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 247 Forecast Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 248 Forecast Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 249 Forecast Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 250 Forecast Sales of Oils and Fats by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Other Dairy in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Value sales of other dairy products will rise by 2% in 2010 to reach US$7.6 billion. In contrast, value sales had grown by an average of 3% over the review period. Value growth was lower than over the total review period because much of the earlier growth came from price increases. In 2010 unit prices did not rise as much as they did in 2007 and 2008 when milk prices rose sharply. Growth for other dairy products came from coffee whiteners and cream.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Nestlé USA Inc leads other dairy products with a 16% value share in 2009, up one percentage point from 2008. The company dominates coffee whiteners through its Coffee-mate brand, and leads condensed/evaporated milk through its Carnation brand. Coffee-mate was the first non-dairy powdered creamer, introduced in 1961. The company introduced Coffee-mate Liquid in 1989, and added flavoured varieties in the 1990s. The firm has benefited from consumers’ shift to cooking and brewing coffee more frequently at home rather than visiting foodservice outlets. Nestlé has benefited from its 2008 World Café Collection launch featuring three Italian flavours – Hazelnut Biscotti, Italian Sweet Crème, and Tiramisu. Like rival Dean Foods Co’s International Delight brand, Coffee-mate introduces seasonal varieties, such as eggnog and gingerbread. In April 2010 the company introduced a new marketing campaign using the slogan, “Add Your Flavor”, which notes that Coffee-mate is available in 25 flavours to allow consumers to customise their coffee.

PROSPECTS

  • Other dairy products is predicted to grow by 7% in constant value terms over the forecast period. This growth rate is slightly higher than the 6% constant value growth seen over the review period. Growth will be driven by coffee whiteners which meet consumers’ desires for indulgence as well as by fromage frais which offers a healthful snack.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 251 Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 252 Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 253 Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 254 Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 255 Cream by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 256 Sales of Other Dairy Products by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 257 Forecast Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 258 Forecast Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 259 Forecast Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 260 Forecast Sales of Other Dairy Products by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Pasta in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Value growth has slowed from the spike of 2007-2008, when wheat prices soared. However, both value and volume growth have continued, as consumers look for value purchases, and see pasta as a way to stretch their money. The depth of the recession caused many consumers to focus on their budgets and to reintroduce themselves to pasta. As a result, pasta sales have done well throughout both the recession and the start of the economic recovery.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Although Barilla Alimentare posted the strongest growth amongst brand pasta companies over the review period, to reach 16% of retail value sales by 2009, private label continued to outsell brand manufacturers. Because private label products enjoy a marked price advantage, consumers are often attracted to their low prices, especially in view of the impact of the rising costs of ingredients and the poor economy. In addition, private label has been able to develop better-for-you and organic pasta options, which helps it to compete against similar brand products. Barilla sustained its success over the review period with its Barilla Plus line of pasta, fortified with protein, fibre and omega-3. The company also continued to spend money on advertising in the US, with TV advertisements highlighting products such as Barilla Plus and Barilla Piccolini, focusing on product benefits, as well as favourable characteristics of the Italian lifestyle, such as fine dining. New World Pasta, with 11% of value sales in 2009, tended to promote new products through sampling or coupons, with less impact than hoped.

PROSPECTS

  • The pasta category is expected to grow in both constant value and volume terms over the short term, with growth slowing somewhat towards the end of the forecast period. As the economy continues to remain in a depressed state, consumers will continue to seek value by using pasta as a satisfying meal option. With the continued expansion of healthier varieties, and new products such as gluten-free pasta, the category should broaden to encompass both economy and premium products. In addition to retail sales, there have been a number of new pasta introductions in foodservice; both Pizza Hut and Domino’s Pizza have introduced pasta menu items in 2008 and 2009, which may prompt consumers to recreate similar dishes at home as they continue to limit eating out.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 261 Sales of Pasta by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 262 Sales of Pasta by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 263 Sales of Pasta by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 264 Sales of Pasta by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 265 Pasta Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 266 Pasta Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 267 Sales of Pasta by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 268 Forecast Sales of Pasta by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 269 Forecast Sales of Pasta by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 270 Forecast Sales of Pasta by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 271 Forecast Sales of Pasta by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Ready Meals in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Retail volume sales of ready meals are expected to be up by 2% in 2010 as consumers purchase convenient ready meals in lieu of dining out or cooking meals from scratch. Value sales are up by a lower 1.5% as unit prices declined in 2010. Volume sales are up in 2010 after being flat in 2009 as shoppers responded favourably to price declines. Ready meals are a popular option for US consumers as they offer convenient at-home dining options. Ready meals involve little preparation, require minimal cleaning up, and come in single-serve sizes. Many Americans also do not know how to cook.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Leader ConAgra Foods Inc saw its value share of ready meals decline from nearly 14% in 2008 to 13% in 2009. The company’s Healthy Choice brand held a 3% value share in 2009, unchanged from 2008 despite new products and investments in marketing. ConAgra spent an estimated US$90 to US$100 million on a marketing campaign to promote its Healthy Choice brand. The highlight of the campaign featured actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus (‘The New Adventures of Old Christine’, ‘Seinfeld’) in a TV commercial where she expressed conflict about being a spokesperson for Healthy Choice. The company’s ‘comfort food’ brand Marie Callender’s also saw its value share of ready meals remain at 3% in 2009.

PROSPECTS

  • Ready meals is projected to grow by 7% in constant value terms over the forecast period to reach sales of around US$26 billion by the end of 2015. Retail volume sales are expected to grow by 2.5% over the same time period. Volume growth is expected to be more positive than the 1% decline seen in the review period. Convenience will remain the primary factor behind the anticipated growth of ready meals. The economic crisis is expected to sustain interest in quick, convenient meal solutions over the next few years, but in time consumers are likely to return to their former habits of dining out more often. Higher-quality, premium products with unique flavours and textures are still likely to have a following.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 272 Sales of Ready Meals by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 273 Sales of Ready Meals by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 274 Sales of Ready Meals by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 275 Sales of Ready Meals by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 276 Ready Meals: Vegetarian Vs Non-vegetarian % Breakdown by Type 2010
  • Table 277 Frozen Ready Meals % Breakdown by Ethnicity 2005-2010
  • Table 278 Chilled Ready Meals % Breakdown by Ethnicity 2005-2010
  • Table 279 Ready Meals Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 280 Ready Meals Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 281 Sales of Ready Meals by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 282 Forecast Sales of Ready Meals by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 283 Forecast Sales of Ready Meals by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 284 Forecast Sales of Ready Meals by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 285 Forecast Sales of Ready Meals by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Sauces, Dressings and Condiments in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of sauces, dressings and condiments are expected to grow by 3% in current value terms in 2010, to reach US$17.8 billion, with volumes are predicted to increase by 2%. The 3% increase in current value terms in 2010 will be on a par with the review period’s CAGR, while the 2% volume growth is set to be higher than the 0% CAGR over the 2005-2010 period. Historically, sauces, dressings and condiments has performed poorly, with volumes falling in 2005-2008, due to Americans dining out more frequently. When the US economy weakened, consumers needed to cook more meals at home. Americans turned to sauces, dressings and condiments as these products help to recreate restaurant flavours at more affordable prices.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Unilever United States overtook Kraft Foods in 2009 to become the leader in sauces, dressings and condiments. The new leader retained its 11% value share in 2009 while its rival saw its share decline from 11% in 2008 to 10% in 2009. The companies were the top two players in mayonnaise and vinaigrettes, and were leading contenders in salad dressings. Kraft Foods and Unilever also held commanding leads in table sauces and pasta sauces respectively. Both companies also held smaller shares in other categories.

PROSPECTS

  • Sales of sauces, dressings and condiments are expected to grow by 4% in constant value terms over the forecast period, to reach US$18.6 billion by 2015. Volume sales are projected to grow by 3% over the same period, which is a great improvement on the stagnation over the review period. The 4% constant value growth for the forecast period matches the 4% value growth (in constant value terms) of the review period that had seen steep price increases in sauces including mayonnaise.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 286 Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 287 Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 288 Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 289 Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 290 Wet/Cooking Sauces by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 291 Sauces, Dressings and Condiments Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 292 Sauces, Dressings and Condiments Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 293 Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 294 Forecast Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 295 Forecast Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 296 Forecast Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 297 Forecast Sales of Sauces, Dressings and Condiments by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Snack Bars in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Snack bars, excluding fruit bars, are expected to perform well in 2010. The category occupies a sweet spot between several growth trends. Firstly, snack bars – especially granola and nutrition/energy bars – benefit from the consumer perception that they are a healthy alternative to other packaged food products. Scores of energy and sports bars are covered in indulgent chocolate coating, yet are packed with fibre, nutrients and protein to provide a sweet yet nutritional snack. Meanwhile, granola has long been considered a healthy food. Secondly, the convenient bar format appeals to on-the-go US consumers because it can easily be stored in a desk, handbag or gym bag, and easily retrieved and consumed. Priced at US$0.30-3.50 per bar, these products include a range that can appeal to a very wide consumer base.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • General Mills leads sales of snack bars with a 23% share at the end of the review period. The company owes its success to its very strong position in granola bars, where its Nature Valley brand has experienced robust growth due to its natural positioning and constant flavour innovation. Total Nature Valley sales have almost quadrupled since 2001. Since 2007 the company expanded its fledgling presence in breakfast bars by launching the Fiber One bar, which contains 35% of a person’s daily fibre requirements. Fiber One has enjoyed robust success and currently only trails Kellogg’s Special K bar in the breakfast bars niche. The brand remains strong despite competing high fibre bars from Kellogg.

PROSPECTS

  • The snack bars market is expected to continue to perform well, albeit at slower growth rates, over the forecast period. From 2008 to 2010 the category continued to grow despite the economic conditions. As US consumers continue to struggle with obesity, products that offer a tasty and healthy snack should continue to gain popularity.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 298 Sales of Snack Bars by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 299 Sales of Snack Bars by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 300 Sales of Snack Bars by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 301 Sales of Snack Bars by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 302 Snack Bars Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 303 Snack Bars Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 304 Sales of Snack Bars by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 305 Forecast Sales of Snack Bars by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 306 Forecast Sales of Snack Bars by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 307 Forecast Sales of Snack Bars by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 308 Forecast Sales of Snack Bars by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 47 Other Snack Bars: Product Types

Soup in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The leading soup brands continued to focus on healthy offerings in 2009 and 2010. Early in the review period, Campbell Soup introduced several reduced sodium soups, which taste like regular soups. Category rival General Mills quickly introduced its own reduced sodium Progresso soups, endorsed by Weight Watchers. Other brands also introduced healthy soup offerings.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Campbell Soup dominates soup in the US, with a 50% value share in 2009. The company has a wide range of soups, including condensed, ready-to-serve canned/preserved soup, as well as chilled and UHT soups. General Mills, with the mainstay Progresso brand, ranks second, with 13% of value sales, which is down slightly from 2008. However, the leading brands have continued to see their shares slowly eroded over the review period as a variety of small competitors offer healthier options and higher-quality soups.

PROSPECTS

  • Low-sodium soups are expected to continue gaining in popularity in the forecast period, as manufacturers reformulate their soups to reduce the sodium content. Campbell Soup began rolling out condensed soups with 25-45% less sodium in June 2010. The company reformulated its tomato soup with lower sodium sea salt to reduce the sodium content by 32% in August 2009. In September 2009, the company’s Campbell’s Healthy Request soups, which were already reduced in sodium, underwent a 15% sodium reduction to 410mg per serving. The company also reformulated its Campbell’s Kids soups to reduce the sodium level to 480mg per serving in January 2009. Sodium reduction became a major issue for food manufacturers, as numerous health organisations have alerted consumers to the dangers of excess sodium consumption, such as contributing to high blood pressure. Sweet and savoury snacks maker Frito-Lay has created a different-shaped salt crystal that maintains the flavour while reducing sodium content significantly. While the company has yet to introduce products, let alone licensed its method, such innovation offers the possibility of further sodium reductions in soup.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 309 Sales of Soup by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 310 Sales of Soup by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 311 Sales of Soup by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 312 Sales of Soup by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 313 Leading Soup Flavours 2005-2010
  • Table 314 Soup Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 315 Soup Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 316 Sales of Soup by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 317 Forecast Sales of Soup by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 318 Forecast Sales of Soup by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 319 Forecast Sales of Soup by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 320 Forecast Sales of Soup by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Spreads in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Following the January 2009 peanut butter recall, nut-based spreads are making a comeback in 2010. After declining by 2% in retail volume terms in 2009, nut-based spreads are projected to grow by 9% in retail volume terms in 2010. The 2009 recall of products made with peanuts, peanut butter and peanut paste from Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) and ensuing negative publicity kept shoppers wary of peanut butter in 2009, even though none of the major retail peanut butter brands used peanuts from PCA. Americans resumed purchasing peanut butter later in 2009 and into 2010. Demand for peanut butter returned quickly, partly due to marketing efforts on the part of peanut butter manufacturers and trade groups to reassure consumers of the safety of peanut butter. Peanut butter also benefited from its status as America’s favourite spread and its popularity with children.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • JM Smucker Co is the leader in the US spreads environment with a 39% value share in 2009. Within jams and preserves the company is unrivalled in its distribution, product range, sizes and national marketing, and held a near 50% value share. JM Smucker Co also dominates nut-based spreads with a 43% value share. The company leads in peanut butter through its Jif brand – the number one brand in the US.

PROSPECTS

  • The spreads industry is expected to enjoy a recovery after facing the peanut butter crisis of 2009. The January 2009 recall of products containing peanut butter by Peanut Corporation of America proved devastating to the retail peanut butter industry and led to a volume decline in 2009. The peanut butter industry was able to reassure most Americans of the safety of peanut butter through media efforts in 2010. Americans, especially children, love peanut butter and wanted to return to eating it. Peanut butter is also a low-priced source of protein – an important factor during a recession which is causing many consumers to economise on food costs. Nut-based spreads are expected to grow 6% in volume terms over the forecast period, slightly down on the review period performance, as they slowly return to pre-recall levels of popularity.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 321 Sales of Spreads by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 322 Sales of Spreads by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 323 Sales of Spreads by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 324 Sales of Spreads by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 325 Leading Flavours for Jams and Preserves 2005-2010
  • Table 326 Spreads Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 327 Spreads Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 328 Sales of Spreads by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 329 Forecast Sales of Spreads by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 330 Forecast Sales of Spreads by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 331 Forecast Sales of Spreads by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 332 Forecast Sales of Spreads by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Sugar Confectionery in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Commodity prices of some key ingredients in sugar confectionery, such as sugar and corn, show positive signs for sugar confectionery. Sugar prices have started to slowly trickle downwards in 2010 as global supply exceeds demand. Corn prices, which peaked in 2008, have decreased since that time. Not surprisingly unit prices of sugar confectionery products have mirrored the increases and declines of commodity prices, and in 2010 sugar confectionery manufacturers are better able to keep unit prices from large increases as costs of manufacturing were lowered.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Mars Inc became the largest sugar confectionery manufacturer in 2008 when it purchased William Wrigley Jr Co. It held on to its leading position in 2009. The Mars-Wrigley deal added well known brands such as Life Savers and Altoids to the Mars portfolio. In the immediate aftermath of the deal Wrigley was maintained as a separate operating division, and Mars shifted control of its Starburst and Skittles brand to Wrigley in 2009.

PROSPECTS

  • Retail value sales of sugar confectionery are forecast to grow by approaching 1% in constant value terms over 2010-15 to reach over US$9.7 billion, while retail volume sales are expected to decline 3% over the same period. This represents a change from the performance seen over the review period, and reflects the increasing challenges sugar confectionery manufacturers will face in coming years. However, unit prices are projected to steady as commodity prices, although difficult to predict, are not expected to be as volatile as in the latter part of the review period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 333 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 334 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 335 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 336 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 337 Sugarised Vs Sugar-free Sugar Confectionery % Breakdown by Type 2010
  • Table 338 Pastilles, Gums, Jellies and Chews by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 339 Sugar Confectionery Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 340 Sugar Confectionery Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 341 Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 342 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 343 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 344 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 345 Forecast Sales of Sugar Confectionery by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 48 Other Sugar Confectionery: Product Types

Sweet and Savoury Snacks in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The chip aisle, which includes chips/crisps, extruded snacks and tortilla/corn chips, will account for approximately 56% of retail volume sales of sweet and savoury snacks in 2010. While manufacturers have invested and promoted various innovations within these categories, given that a large number of the products are fried and are relatively high in fat and sodium, retail volume sales of each product are expected to grow by less than 1% in 2010.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • PepsiCo’s Frito-Lay Co division was the unrivalled leader in sweet and savoury snacks in 2009, with a 44% value share. The company retained its leading positions in chips/crisps, extruded snacks, tortilla/corn chips and other sweet and savoury snacks. In May 2009, Frito-Lay launched a nationwide advertising campaign promoting the fact that the potatoes used to make its chips/crisps are locally sourced. The potatoes are grown by 80 farmers in 27 states, and consumers can be assured that their Frito-Lay chips/crisps are local: they can track where the products were manufactured by entering in the product code on the company’s website.

PROSPECTS

  • Sales of sweet and savoury snacks are expected to grow by 5% and 3% in constant value and volume terms respectively over the 2010-2015 period, to be worth US$33.3 billion. While these growth rates are lower than over the review period, snacking will remain a part of American culture.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 346 Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 347 Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 348 Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 349 Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 350 Popcorn by Type: % Value Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 351 Sweet and Savoury Snacks Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 352 Sweet and Savoury Snacks Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 353 Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Distribution Format: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 354 Forecast Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 355 Forecast Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 356 Forecast Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 357 Forecast Sales of Sweet and Savoury Snacks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 49 Other Sweet and Savoury Snacks: Product Types

Yoghurt in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • After growing by over 8% from 2006-2008, sales of yoghurt and sour milk drinks have slowed down and will grow by 5% in value terms in 2010. While consumer interest in yoghurt and sour milk drinks remains strong, there was an absence of new launches in 2010. Year 2006 sales were boosted by the multimillion dollar launch of Activia and 2007 saw the launch of Yoplait Yo-Plus. In contrast, new product development was limited in 2010. Retail volume sales also grew at a slower pace in 2010, with spoonable yoghurt volume rising by 5% over 2009. The volume increase reflects a significant slowdown from the review period CAGR of 6%.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Dannon Co beat out General Mills in 2009 to become the leader in US yoghurt with a value share of 31%; up three percentage points from 2008. With the inclusion of its sister Stonyfield Farm division, the parent Groupe Danone held a 36% value share in 2009. The company’s flagship Dannon brand did well in 2009, growing two percentage points to hold a value share of almost 19% in 2009.

PROSPECTS

  • Sales of yoghurt and sour milk drinks are expected to continue growing, with constant value growth of 9% over the forecast period. The forecast growth is much lower than the 30% constant value growth recorded during the review period. Review period growth was boosted by the 2006 multi-million dollar launch of Activia. Yoghurt’s appeal began to expand outside the health food store demographic during the review period, and the wide array of functional, probiotic products that are popular in Europe are relatively new to the US. As the category diversifies, it will attract more consumers. In fact, consumption rates in Europe indicate that there is substantial room for growth in yoghurt consumption in the US. The bulk of consumers have now tried yoghurt, and many eat it on occasion. Marketing efforts are now directed towards increasing consumption among existing consumers: Dannon Co recommends eating Activia every day to gain health benefits. However, without a blockbuster launch like Activia it will be difficult to sustain the growth rates of the review period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 358 Sales of Yoghurt by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 359 Sales of Yoghurt by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 360 Sales of Yoghurt by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 361 Sales of Yoghurt by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 362 Soy-based vs Dairy-based Yoghurt % Breakdown 2010
  • Table 363 Leading Flavours for Flavoured Spoonable Yoghurt 2005-2010
  • Table 364 Leading Flavours for Fruited Spoonable Yoghurt 2005-2010
  • Table 365 Yoghurt Company Shares 2005-2009
  • Table 366 Yoghurt Brand Shares 2006-2009
  • Table 367 Forecast Sales of Yoghurt by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 368 Forecast Sales of Yoghurt by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 369 Forecast Sales of Yoghurt by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 370 Forecast Sales of Yoghurt by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 371 Forecast Sales of Yoghurt by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Packaged Food
    • Baby Food
      • Dried Baby Food
      • Milk Formula
        • Standard Milk Formula
          • Liquid Standard Milk Formula
          • Powder Standard Milk Formula
        • Follow-On Milk Formula
          • Liquid Follow-On Milk Formula
          • Powder Follow-On Milk Formula
        • Toddler Milk Formula
          • Liquid Toddler Milk Formula
          • Powder Toddler Milk Formula
        • Special Baby Milk Formula
          • Liquid Special Baby Milk Formula
          • Powder Special Baby Milk Formula
      • Prepared Baby Food
      • Other Baby Food
    • Bakery
      • Baked Goods
        • Bread
          • Bread Substitutes
          • Packaged/Industrial Bread
          • Unpackaged/Artisanal Bread
        • Cakes
          • Packaged/Industrial Cakes
          • Unpackaged/Artisanal Cakes
        • Pastries
          • Packaged/Industrial Pastries
          • Unpackaged/Artisanal Pastries
      • Biscuits
        • Savoury Biscuits and Crackers
        • Sweet Biscuits
          • Chocolate Coated Biscuits
          • Cookies
          • Filled Biscuits
          • Plain Biscuits
          • Sandwich Biscuits
      • Breakfast Cereals
        • Hot Cereals
        • RTE Cereals
          • Children's Breakfast Cereals
          • Family Breakfast Cereals
            • Flakes
            • Muesli
            • Other RTE Cereals
    • Canned/Preserved Food
      • Canned/Preserved Beans
      • Canned/Preserved Fish/Seafood
      • Canned/Preserved Fruit
      • Canned/Preserved Meat and Meat Products
      • Canned/Preserved Pasta
      • Canned/Preserved Ready Meals
      • Canned/Preserved Soup
      • Canned/Preserved Tomatoes
      • Canned/Preserved Vegetables
      • Other Canned/Preserved Food
    • Chilled Processed Food
      • Chilled Fish/Seafood
        • Chilled Coated Fish/Seafood
        • Chilled Processed Fish/Seafood
        • Chilled Smoked Fish/Seafood
      • Chilled Lunch Kits
      • Chilled Noodles
      • Chilled Pizza
      • Chilled Processed Meat
      • Chilled Ready Meals
      • Chilled Soup
      • Chilled/Fresh Pasta
      • Fresh Cut Fruits
      • Prepared Salads
    • Confectionery
      • Chocolate Confectionery
        • Alfajores
        • Bagged Selflines/Softlines
        • Boxed Assortments
          • Standard Boxed Assortments
          • Twist Wrapped Miniatures
        • Chocolate with Toys
        • Countlines
        • Seasonal Chocolate
        • Tablets
        • Other Chocolate Confectionery
      • Gum
        • Bubble Gum
        • Chewing Gum
          • Functional Gum
          • Sugar Free Gum
          • Sugarised Gum
      • Sugar Confectionery
        • Boiled Sweets
        • Liquorice
        • Lollipops
        • Medicated Confectionery
        • Mints
          • Power Mints
          • Standard Mints
        • Pastilles, Gums, Jellies and Chews
        • Toffees, Caramels and Nougat
        • Other Sugar Confectionery
    • Dairy
      • Cheese
        • Processed Cheese
          • Spreadable Processed Cheese
          • Unspreadable Processed Cheese
        • Unprocessed Cheese
          • Hard Cheese
            • Packaged Hard Cheese
            • Unpackaged Hard Cheese
          • Soft Cheese
          • Spreadable Unprocessed Cheese
      • Drinking Milk Products
        • Flavoured Milk Drinks
          • Dairy Only Flavoured Milk Drinks
          • Flavoured Milk Drinks with Fruit Juice
        • Flavoured Powder Milk Drinks
          • Chocolate-Based Flavoured Powder Drinks
          • Malt-Based Hot Drinks
          • Non-Chocolate-Based Flavoured Powder Drinks
        • Milk
          • Fresh/Pasteurised Milk
            • Fat-Free Fresh/Pasteurised Milk
            • Full Fat Fresh/Pasteurised Milk
            • Semi Skimmed Fresh/Pasteurised Milk
          • Goat Milk
          • Long-Life/UHT Milk
            • Fat-Free Long Life/UHT Milk
            • Full Fat Long Life/UHT Milk
            • Semi Skimmed Long Life/UHT Milk
        • Powder Milk
        • Soy Beverages
          • Soy Milk
          • Soy Drinks
      • Yoghurt and Sour Milk Drinks
        • Sour Milk Drinks
        • Yoghurt
          • Drinking Yoghurt
            • Functional Drinking Yoghurt
              • Pro/Pre Biotic Drinking Yoghurt
              • Other Functional Drinking Yoghurt
            • Regular Drinking Yoghurt
          • Spoonable Yoghurt
            • Flavoured Spoonable Yoghurt
            • Fruited Spoonable Yoghurt
            • Functional Spoonable Yoghurt
              • Pro/Pre Biotic Spoonable Yoghurt
              • Other Functional Spoonable Yoghurt
            • Plain Spoonable Yoghurt
      • Other Dairy
        • Chilled and Shelf Stable Desserts
          • Dairy-Based Desserts
            • Chilled Dairy-Based Desserts
            • Shelf Stable Dairy-Based Desserts
          • Soy-Based Desserts
            • Chilled Soy-Based Desserts
            • Shelf Stable Soy-Based Desserts
        • Chilled Snacks
        • Coffee Whiteners
        • Condensed/Evaporated Milk
          • Flavoured, Functional Condensed Milk
          • Plain Condensed/Evaporated Milk
        • Cream
        • Fromage Frais and Quark
          • Flavoured Fromage Frais and Quark
          • Plain Fromage Frais and Quark
          • Savoury Fromage Frais and Quark
    • Dried Processed Food
      • Dehydrated Soup
      • Dessert Mixes
      • Dried Pasta
      • Dried Ready Meals
      • Instant Noodles
        • Cups/Bowl Instant Noodles
        • Pouch Instant Noodles
      • Instant Soup
      • Plain Noodles
      • Rice
    • Frozen Processed Food
      • Frozen Bakery
      • Frozen Desserts
      • Frozen Meat Substitutes
      • Frozen Noodles
      • Frozen Pizza
      • Frozen Processed Fish/Seafood
      • Frozen Processed Potatoes
        • Non-Oven Frozen Potatoes
        • Oven Baked Potato Chips
        • Other Oven Baked Potato Products
      • Frozen Processed Poultry
      • Frozen Processed Red Meat
      • Frozen Processed Vegetables
      • Frozen Ready Meals
      • Frozen Soup
      • Other Frozen Processed Food
    • Ice Cream
      • Frozen Yoghurt
      • Ice Cream Parlours
      • Impulse Ice Cream
        • Multi-Pack Dairy Ice Cream
        • Multi-Pack Water Ice Cream
        • Single Portion Dairy Ice Cream
        • Single Portion Water Ice Cream
      • Retail Artisanal Ice Cream
      • Take-Home Ice Cream
        • Take-Home Dairy Ice Cream
          • Bulk Ice Cream
          • Ice Cream Desserts
        • Take-Home Water Ice Cream
    • Meal Replacement
      • Convalescence
      • Meal Replacement Slimming
    • Noodles
      • Chilled Noodles
      • Frozen Noodles
      • Instant Noodles
        • Cups/Bowl Instant Noodles
        • Pouch Instant Noodles
      • Plain Noodles
      • Snack Noodles
    • Oils and Fats
      • Butter
      • Cooking Fats
      • Margarine
      • Olive Oil
      • Spreadable Oils and Fats
        • Functional Spreadable Oils and Fats
        • Regular Spreadable Oils and Fats
      • Vegetable and Seed Oil
    • Pasta
      • Canned/Preserved Pasta
      • Chilled/Fresh Pasta
      • Dried Pasta
    • Ready Meals
      • Canned/Preserved Ready Meals
      • Chilled Pizza
      • Chilled Ready Meals
      • Dinner Mixes
      • Dried Ready Meals
      • Frozen Pizza
      • Frozen Ready Meals
      • Prepared Salads
    • Sauces, Dressings and Condiments
      • Bouillon/Stock Cubes
        • Gravy Cubes and Powders
        • Liquid Stocks and Fonds
        • Stock Cubes and Powders
      • Dips
      • Dry Sauces/Powder Mixes
      • Herbs and Spices
      • Ketchup
      • Mayonnaise
        • Low Fat Mayonnaise
        • Regular Mayonnaise
      • Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)
      • Mustard
      • Pasta Sauces
      • Pickled Products
      • Salad Dressings
        • Low Fat Salad Dressings
        • Regular Salad Dressings
      • Soy Based Sauces
      • Table Sauces
        • Barbecue Sauces
        • Steak Sauces
        • Other Table Sauces
      • Tomato Pastes and Purées
      • Vinaigrettes
      • Wet/Cooking Sauces
      • Other Sauces, Dressings and Condiments
    • Snack Bars
      • Breakfast Bars
      • Energy and Nutrition Bars
      • Fruit Bars
      • Granola/Muesli Bars
      • Other Snack Bars
    • Soup
      • Canned/Preserved Soup
      • Chilled Soup
      • Dehydrated Soup
      • Frozen Soup
      • Instant Soup
      • UHT Soup
    • Spreads
      • Chocolate Spreads
      • Honey
      • Jams and Preserves
      • Nut-Based Spreads
      • Yeast-Based Spreads
    • Sweet and Savoury Snacks
      • Chips/Crisps
      • Extruded Snacks
      • Fruit Snacks
      • Nuts
      • Popcorn
      • Pretzels
      • Tortilla/Corn Chips
      • Other Sweet and Savoury Snacks

Statistics Included

Statistics Included

For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

From Passport

  • Market Sizes
  • Company Shares
  • Brand Shares
  • Distribution
  • Analysis By Ethnicity
  • Analysis by Flavour
  • Analysis by Type
  • Chilled vs Ambient
  • In-store Bakery Sales
  • Per Cent Share Of Chilled Meat Substitute
  • Pricing
  • Products by Ingredient
  • Products by Ingredient
  • Single Portion vs Multi-portion
  • Soy-based vs Dairy-based
  • Sugarised vs Sugar-free
  • Vegetarian vs Non-vegetarian

Market size details:

  • Retail Volume
  • Retail Volume % growth
  • Retail Volume per capita
  • Foodservice Volume
  • Foodservice Volume % growth
  • Foodservice Volume per capita
  • Total Volume
  • Total Volume % growth
  • Total Volume per capita
  • Retail Value retail selling price % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail RTD volume
  • Retail RTD volume % growth
  • Retail RTD volume per capita
  • Foodservice RTD volume
  • Foodservice RTD volume % growth
  • Foodservice RTD volume per capita
  • Total RTD volume
  • Total RTD volume % growth
  • Total RTD volume per capita
  • Retail Volume (Tonnes)
  • Retail Volume (Tonnes) % growth
  • Retail Volume (Tonnes) per capita
  • Foodservice Volume (Tonnes)
  • Foodservice Volume (Tonnes) % growth
  • Foodservice Volume (Tonnes) per capita
  • Total Volume (Tonnes)
  • Total Volume (Tonnes) % growth
  • Total Volume (Tonnes) per capita
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value retail selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices % growth
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
  • Retail Value manufacturer selling price Nominal (Current) Prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY

Methodology

Methodology

Global insight and local knowledge

With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

Industry specialists

Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

Country and regional analysts

Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

In-country research network

To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

Research Methodology

Our research methods

Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

Desk research

With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

  • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
  • National and international trade press
  • National and international trade associations
  • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
  • Company financials and annual reports
  • Broker reports
  • Online databases
  • The financial, business and mainstream press

Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

Store checks

Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

  • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
  • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
  • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
  • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

Trade survey

Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

Trade surveys allow us to:

  • Fill gaps in available published data per company
  • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
  • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
  • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

Company analysis

At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

Forecasts

Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

Data validation

All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

Market analysis

Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

my pages

Want to find out more about this report?