You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesSoft Drinks
print my pages

Country Report

Soft Drinks in Poland

Jul 2011

Price: $1,900

About this Report

About this Report

Delivery method: instant download
Report format: PDF doc_pdf.png (download a sample)
Market statistics: Excel workbook doc_excel_table.png (download a sample)

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Soft Drinks industry in Poland with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Soft Drinks industry in Poland, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in Poland for free:

The Soft Drinks in Poland market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth  
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Soft Drinks in Poland?
  • What are the major brands in Poland?
  • What potential exists for multinational vs. local soft drinks companies looking to increase market share?
  • How have changing social attitudes affected soft drink sales?
  • How have sustainability issues; such as environmentally-friendly packaging, legislation on recyclability, or the amount of plastic in bottles, affected the soft drink industry?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Soft Drinks market research database.

Sample Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Dynamic review period growth underpinned by rising incomes

Soft drinks saw dynamic growth for the review period as a whole, with this largely due to rising disposable income levels as a result of Poland’s economic growth. Stronger sales were also linked to ongoing development in the country’s retail network, with the strong emergence of supermarkets/hypermarkets and discounters. In addition, domestic players began to invest more in new product development and marketing during the review period, with these players’ affordable prices encouraging consumers to buy a larger quantity of soft drinks.

Soft drinks continues to grow despite economic slowdown

Soft drinks continued to see volume and current value sales growth in 2010 over the previous year, despite economic uncertainty in the last years of the review period due to the global economic downturn. Soft drinks however saw growth rates drop dramatically in comparison to the review period CAGR due to many consumers becoming more cautious in their spending habits. 2010 also saw a marked decline in constant value unit price as consumers sought out cheaper options, with this trend mainly benefiting domestic players and private label ranges. There was a degree of polarisation, however, with many mid- and high-income consumers becoming willing to pay more for healthier or better quality products.

Multinationals remain strong but face growing domestic competition

Multinationals continued to be strong in soft drinks at the end of the review period, with Coca-Cola being a clear leader and PepsiCo and Danone also ranking in the top four. However, many domestic players gained share in 2010, benefiting from lower prices and rising consumer price-sensitivity. Domestic player Maspex ranked second in 2010 and gained share slightly over the previous year, while other strong domestic performers included Naleczow Zdroj and Herbapol. Private label products also gained share, benefiting from the continued expansion of supermarkets/hypermarkets and discounters across the country.

Independent small grocers loses share to modern retail formats

Independent small grocers continued to be the most significant distribution channel for soft drinks at the end of the review period. However, this channel dramatically lost share in 2010 as consumers sought out lower-priced options. The ongoing expansion of supermarkets/hypermarkets and discounters across the country notably resulted in these channels gaining share thanks to their lower prices and wide ranges. Convenience stores also benefited from ongoing outlet volume expansion in 2010.

Growing focus on health expected for forecast period

Soft drinks is expected to see slower volume and constant value sales growth during the forecast period in comparison to that seen during the review period. This will be due to growing maturity in many product areas and also stronger price competition, with private label and discounters both set to gain a larger share in sales. However, soft drinks is expected to benefit from a stronger focus on value-added products with a healthy positioning during the forecast period, among both producers and consumers. Manufacturers are for example likely to increasingly replace artificial components with natural substances such as the sweetener stevia or the stimulant guarana. Packaging and marketing will be crucial in communicating products’ health benefits, with players keen to encourage consumers to trade up to healthier soft drinks.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Soft Drinks in Poland - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Dynamic review period growth underpinned by rising incomes

Soft drinks continues to grow despite economic slowdown

Multinationals remain strong but face growing domestic competition

Independent small grocers loses share to modern retail formats

Growing focus on health expected for forecast period

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Multinationals intensify investment in Poland

Domestic players push for growth through focus on quality and health

Volatility of economic environment increasingly challenging for companies

Expansion of discounters hits independent small grocers hard

Health and wellness trend slowly spreads across soft drinks

MARKET DATA

  • Table 1 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 2 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 3 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 4 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 5 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010
  • Table 6 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume 2010
  • Table 7 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010
  • Table 8 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value 2010
  • Table 9 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 10 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 11 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 12 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 13 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 14 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 15 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 16 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 17 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2006-2010
  • Table 18 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2007-2010
  • Table 19 Penetration of Private Label (as sold) by Category by Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 20 Penetration of Private Label by Category by Value 2005-2010
  • Table 21 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category and Distribution Format: % Analysis 2010
  • Table 22 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 23 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 24 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 25 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 26 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 27 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 28 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 29 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

APPENDIX

Fountain Sales in Poland

  • Table 30 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 31 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 32 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 33 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 34 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 35 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 36 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 37 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2010-2015

DEFINITIONS

Sources

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Soft Drinks in Poland - Company Profiles

FPH Marwit in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 4 FPH Marwit: Competitive Position 2010

Herbapol Lublin SA in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 6 Herbapol Lublin SA: Competitive Position 2010

Jurajska Sp zoo in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 9 Jurajska Sp zoo: Competitive Position 2010

Maspex Sp zoo in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 11 Maspex Sp zoo: Competitive Position 2010

Naleczow Zdroj Sp zoo in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

  • Summary 14 Naleczow Zdroj Sp zoo: Production Statistics 2007

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 15 Naleczow Zdroj Sp zoo: Competitive Position 2010

Sokpol sp zoo in Soft Drinks (Poland)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 18 Sokpol sp zoo: Competitive Position 2010

Bottled Water in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Bottled water attracted increasing numbers of consumers away from less healthy soft drinks such as carbonates towards the end of the review period. This was due to rising health awareness among Poles. An increasing number of consumers are also aware of the differences between spring water and mineral water. Consumers increasingly drink bottled water not only during the summer months but throughout the entire year. Shoppers also became increasingly sophisticated, with many checking the contents of bottled water in order to establish levels of elements such as magnesium or sodium. The economic slowdown also benefited bottled water, meanwhile, as it is generally low-priced in comparison to other soft drinks.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Zywiec Zdroj, owned by Danone, led bottled water sales in 2010 with a value share of 28%, due to the widespread popularity of its eponymous brand, which is viewed as inherently Polish by consumers. The company also gained over half a percentage point in value share in 2010 over the previous year thanks to its strong marketing. Nestlé Waters Polska meanwhile ranked second with 10% value share, profiting from the high recognition rate of the Naleczowianka brand. Third-ranked Naleczow Zdroj was the best performing domestic producer, with its Cisowianka brand gaining share from Coca-Cola’s Kropla Beskidu in 2010 thanks to its lower prices.

PROSPECTS

  • Bottled water is predicted to record double-digit value and volume growth over the forecast period. The growth will come from growing awareness of bottled water’s benefits, new product developments and the strong progress of less developed categories such as flavoured bottled water and functional bottled water. The low price of bottled water is also expected to attract cost-conscious Polish shoppers.

CATEGORY DATA

Institutional bottled water sales

  • Table 38 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 39 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 40 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 41 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 42 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 43 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 44 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 45 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 46 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 47 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 48 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 49 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 50 Sales of Bottled Water to Institutional Channel 2005-2010

Carbonates in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Despite growing health awareness and an ageing population, carbonates still managed to attract consumers at the end of the review period. The shift from carbonates towards soft drinks offering health benefits is relatively slow, with cola carbonates even continuing to advance relatively strongly. This trend derives from the marketing strength of leading brands and attendant cultural symbolism. For example, Coca-Cola enjoys the status of a component of consumption culture rather than simply a drink.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Coca-Cola dominates carbonates sales in Poland due to its strong distribution network and extensive brand marketing. Coca-Cola cooperates with 60,000 independent small grocers and over 60,000 on-trade establishments. Coca-Cola is one of the few companies operating within fast-moving consumer goods in Poland to use the Direct Store Distribution model. Coca-Cola’s domestic subsidiary has four production plants and 32 sales centres in the country. Pepsi-Cola ranked second in 2010, enjoying rapid growth over the previous year due to changes in the company’s global strategy. Czech company Kofola, which merged with domestic player Hoop, occupied third position in GBO terms in 2010, with Hoop accounting for 11% value share. Domestic companies such as PPH Zbyszko, Jurajska and Dodoni also have significant retail volume shares, with the low price of their brands proving popular with price-sensitive consumers.

PROSPECTS

  • It is predicted that carbonates will hold a lower share of throat by 2015. Rising health awareness will continue to put growing pressure on carbonates sales over the forecast period. For example, it is possible that stores located near to schools will be banned from selling carbonates in the near future. In addition, the government is contemplating the imposition of restrictions on the advertising of carbonates. The introduction of excise duty on carbonates in light of sovereign debt risk concerns cannot be excluded.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 51 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 52 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 53 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 54 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 55 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 56 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 57 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 58 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 59 Off-trade Sales of Low Calorie Cola Carbonates by Category: % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 60 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 61 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 62 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 63 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 64 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 65 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 66 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 67 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 68 Low Calorie Carbonates by Subsector 2005-2010

Concentrates in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Concentrates is a very heterogeneous group of products, including instant tea, powdered sports drinks and syrups. This results in divergent trends driving concentrates sales. The positioning and consumers’ understanding of these products also varies greatly. However, 2010 saw stronger constant value growth of 5% in comparison to a review period constant value CAGR of 3%. The economic slowdown benefited sales of concentrates as these products are typically cheaper alternatives to other soft drinks. Many consumers became more cautious with their spending due to economic uncertainty at the end of the review period, boosting sales of these low-priced products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Ekoland, owned by domestic player Maspex, led concentrates sales in 2010 with its eponymous brand accounting for 22% value share. Ekoland was followed by Herbapol with 20% off-trade value share and Hoop’s Paola with 13% share. Ekoland’s strong position is mainly due to the wide availability of its range.

PROSPECTS

  • Players in concentrates are aware that the stronger sales performance seen towards the end of the review period was chiefly due to higher price-sensitivity. They are also aware that concentrates suffers from an unhealthy image in comparison to many other soft drinks. Consequently, players will be keen to adopt a healthier positioning during the forecast period. There is expected to be a strong focus on the use of natural ingredients, with liquid concentrates likely to see the emergence of products based entirely on concentrated fruit juice and without any sugar. This is expected to result in ongoing polarisation, with some consumers attracted by the flexibility and flavour of premium concentrates and other seeking out the low prices of private label products.

CATEGORY DATA

Concentrates Conversions

  • Table 69 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 70 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 71 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 72 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 73 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 74 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 75 Company Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 76 Brand Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 77 Company Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 78 Brand Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 79 Company Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 80 Brand Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 81 Company Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 82 Brand Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 83 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 84 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 85 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 86 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 87 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 88 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Summary 19 Concentrates Conversion Factors for Ready-to-Drink (RTD) Format

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of fruit/vegetable juice are slowly approaching saturation point in Poland. However, trade sources claim that this is partly because the choice of products is limited not only in comparison to Western European countries but also in comparison to Eastern European countries such as Russia. Manufacturers are seeking new ways to attract consumers. Consumers are meanwhile becoming increasingly attracted by fruit/vegetable juice that offers health benefits such as smoothies, child-specific products and products that highlighting the provenance of the fruits/vegetables used. Maspex succeeded with its child-specific Kubus range in 2010.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Domestic companies Maspex, Agros Nova and Hortex Holding lead fruit/vegetable juice sales in Poland. Based near Krakow in southern Poland, Maspex led sales due to the widespread popularity of its Tymbark and Kubus brands. Agros Nova ranked second mainly thanks to its Fortuna brand and was followed by Hortex Holding. Multinationals, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola thus far failed to secure strong positions within fruit/vegetable juice, mainly as a result of competition from local brands. Trade sources claim that multinationals failed to invest sufficiently in this area due to overconfidence and due to these players underestimating the level of competition from domestic companies.

PROSPECTS

  • The ageing population is expected to drive demand for fruit/vegetable juice that offers health benefits during the forecast period. However, consumers are conservative and manufacturers will be cautious with introduction of any revolutionary innovations. The polarisation of fruit/vegetable juice sales will also prove challenging to manufacturers. Producers of premium brands will make efforts to provide consumers with added value in order to justify higher prices. Manufacturers will also be forced to adapt to a highly volatile economic environment characterised by surging juice concentrate prices, volatile currencies, unstable raw material prices and rising packaging costs.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 89 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 90 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 91 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 92 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 93 Leading Flavours for 100% Juice: % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 94 Leading Flavours for Nectars (25-99% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 95 Leading Flavours for Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 96 % Share of Smoothies in 100% Juice and Nectars (25-99% Juice): Off-trade Value 2010
  • Table 97 Chilled Vs Ambient Not From Concentrate 100% Juice: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 98 Chilled Vs Ambient Reconstituted 100% Juice: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 99 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 100 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 101 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 102 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 103 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 104 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 105 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 106 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

RTD Coffee in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Ongoing growth in RTD coffee was maintained in 2010 by the widening availability of economy brands and private label products. The leading brand continued to be economy brand iQ, with this brand continuing to expand its distribution via convenience stores across the country. In addition, smaller economy brands continued to gain sales such as Temar’s Caffee Cool, while a widening range of private label products continued to gain consumers’ attention. Many consumers are attracted by the indulgent flavour and convenience offered by RTD coffee but they are increasingly unwilling to pay high prices for these products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • IQ Drink was the clear leader in RTD coffee in the last three years of the review period, accounting for an off-trade value share of 23% in 2010 over the previous year. The company benefits from offering affordable products, with this resulting in a considerably stronger volume share of 27% in the year. This domestic company first entered in 2005 and continued to gain share throughout the review period thanks to widening distribution. The company proved particularly successful at the end of the review period due to growing economic uncertainty and continued to marginally gain value and volume share in 2010 over the previous year.

PROSPECTS

  • There is expected to be growing commoditisation in RTD coffee during the forecast period. Increasingly, those seeking a premium coffee flavour are expected to opt for iced coffee drinks prepared fresh in specialist coffee shops. Those who continue to buy RTD coffee are meanwhile likely to increasingly opt for economy domestic brands such as iQ or for private label products. Poor sales are meanwhile likely to result in many leading multinationals exiting RTD coffee, further contributing to unit price decline. Consequently, there is expected to be a constant value unit price decline of 23% during the forecast period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 107 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 108 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 109 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 110 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 111 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 112 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 113 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 114 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2007-2010

RTD Tea in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • While black RTD tea is mature and declining, niche health and wellness variants continued to see strong growth in 2010 over the previous year. Green tea and rooibos tea proved particularly successful, with sales largely driven by Pepsi-Lipton’s strong promotion for its Lipton Ice range. Coca-Cola also enjoyed success with its Nestea Green Tea in 2010. These products benefited from their novelty and from growing consumer interest in healthier tea, with many regarding these products as a healthier alternative to cola carbonates.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • RTD tea continued to be led by strong multinationals Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Lipton in 2010. Coca-Cola offers the Nestea brand and accounted for a steady 44% value share in 2010, while Pepsi-Lipton offers Lipton and gained almost three percentage points from 2009 to account for 39% of value in 2010. These players benefit from their well-marketed brands’ longstanding presence in RTD tea, having done much to drive sales growth in this product area prior to and during the review period. Pepsi-Lipton proved particularly successful towards the end of the review period due to its focus on health and wellness tea, particularly green and red RTD tea.

PROSPECTS

  • There is likely to be ongoing polarisation in RTD tea during the forecast period. Increasingly, households are likely to opt for bulk packs of private label tea at low prices, while impulse purchases are increasingly likely to be of the leading global brands Lipton and Nestea. Within these leading brands, there is also expected to be growing interest in healthier green, white and red RTD tea, with health-conscious consumers happy to pay more for these products. Domestic brands may therefore struggle to survive during the forecast period as consumers trade down or trade up. Consequently, domestic players such as Maspex, Jurajska and Hortex are likely to exit or switch to private label production during the forecast period.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 115 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 116 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 117 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 118 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 119 Leading Flavours for RTD Tea: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2010
  • Table 120 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 121 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 122 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 123 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 124 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 125 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 126 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 127 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Sports and Energy Drinks in Poland - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • 2010 saw the introduction of energy shots. Red Bull and Coca-Cola rolled out mini variants of their brands almost simultaneously in January 2010. A number of domestic companies including FoodCare and Ustronianka followed in these multinationals’ footsteps. However, energy shots witnessed only a modest response from consumers in 2010. Poles typically consume energy drinks not only to receive an energy boost but also to quench their thirst. This results in a stronger popularity for large pack sizes in Poland in comparison to other European countries. The bitter taste of energy shots also failed to satisfy consumers’ palates.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Domestic player FoodCare continued to lead sports and energy drinks in value terms in 2010, with a value share of 24% largely thanks to its Tiger Energy Drink brand. This brand benefits from its low unit price, increasing availability and the introduction of new larger PET pack sizes towards the end of the review period. Coca-Cola meanwhile ranked second with 21% share derived from its Burn and Powerade brands in 2010. Third-ranked Red Bull lead in 2005 with a strong 42% value share. However, the company lost its lead during the review period due to strengthening competition and its high prices.

PROSPECTS

  • There is expected to be strong polarisation in sports and energy drinks during the forecast period, combined with the growing importance of products offering health benefits. Manufacturers will seek to introduce healthier energy drinks based on stimulating natural ingredients such as guarana or ginseng. Manufacturers of premium products will particularly focus on highlighting new ingredients and their function. The ongoing expansion of discounters will meanwhile result in a growing share for private label ranges.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 128 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 129 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 130 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 131 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 132 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 133 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 134 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 135 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 136 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 137 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 138 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 139 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 140 Still vs. Carbonated Sports and energy drinks % Off-trade Volume 2005-2010

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Soft Drinks
    • Bottled Water
      • Carbonated Bottled Water
      • Flavoured Bottled Water
      • Functional Bottled Water
      • Still Bottled Water
    • Carbonates
      • Cola Carbonates
        • Regular Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Regular Cola
          • Speciality Regular Cola
        • Low Calorie Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Low Calorie Cola
          • Speciality Low Calorie Cola
      • Non-Cola Carbonates
        • Lemonade/Lime
          • Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
          • Non Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
        • Mixers
          • Ginger Ale
          • Seltzer
          • Tonic Water
          • Other Mixers
        • Orange Carbonates
          • Juice-based Orange Carbonates
          • Non Juice-based Orange Carbonates
        • Other Non-Cola Carbonates
    • Concentrates
      • Liquid Concentrates
      • Powder Concentrates
    • Fruit/Vegetable Juice
      • 100% Juice
        • Frozen 100% Juice
        • Not from Concentrate 100% Juice
        • Reconstituted 100% Juice
      • Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice)
        • Frozen Juice Drinks
        • Juice Drinks Excluding Asian
      • Fruit-Flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content)
      • Nectars (25-99% Juice)
        • Frozen Nectars
        • Unfrozen Nectars
    • RTD Coffee
    • RTD Tea
      • Still RTD Tea
        • Still RTD Tea Excluding Asian
      • Carbonated RTD Tea
    • Sports and Energy Drinks
      • Energy Drinks
      • Sports Drinks
    • Asian Speciality Drinks

    Statistics Included

    Statistics Included

    For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

    From Passport

    • Market sizes
    • Company shares
    • Brand shares
    • Distribution
    • Chilled v ambient juices
    • Flavours
    • Off-trade vs on-trade
    • Per cent share of smoothies
    • Pricing
    • Products by ingredient
    • Products by ingredient
    • Sports vs other functional bottled water

    Market size details:

    • Retail volume
    • Retail volume % growth
    • Retail volume per capita
    • Foodservice volume
    • Foodservice volume % growth
    • Foodservice volume per capita
    • Total volume
    • Total volume % growth
    • Total volume per capita
    • Retail value retail selling price % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price % growth
    • Total value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail rtd volume
    • Retail rtd volume % growth
    • Retail rtd volume per capita
    • Foodservice rtd volume
    • Foodservice rtd volume % growth
    • Foodservice rtd volume per capita
    • Total rtd volume
    • Total rtd volume % growth
    • Total rtd volume per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice per capita
    • Total fountain on-trade volume
    • Total fountain on-trade volume % growth
    • Total fountain on-trade volume per capita
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY

    Methodology

    Methodology

    Global insight and local knowledge

    With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

    This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

    Industry specialists

    Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

    Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

    The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

    Country and regional analysts

    Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

    In-country research network

    To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

    Research Methodology

    Our research methods

    Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

    Desk research

    With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

    • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
    • National and international trade press
    • National and international trade associations
    • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
    • Company financials and annual reports
    • Broker reports
    • Online databases
    • The financial, business and mainstream press

    Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

    Store checks

    Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

    • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
    • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
    • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
    • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

    Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

    Trade survey

    Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

    Trade surveys allow us to:

    • Fill gaps in available published data per company
    • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
    • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
    • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

    In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

    Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

    Company analysis

    At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

    At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

    Forecasts

    Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

    Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

    Data validation

    All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

    The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

    Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

    Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

    Market analysis

    Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

    Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

    my pages

    Want to find out more about this report?

    RELATED

    Country Report

    Consumer Lifestyle

    Future Demographic

    Country Report