You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesSoft Drinks
print my pages

Country Report

Soft Drinks in Romania

May 2011

Price: $1,900

About this Report

About this Report

Delivery method: instant download
Report format: PDF doc_pdf.png (download a sample)
Market statistics: Excel workbook doc_excel_table.png (download a sample)

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Soft Drinks industry in Romania with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Soft Drinks industry in Romania, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in Romania for free:

The Soft Drinks in Romania market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth  
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Soft Drinks in Romania?
  • What are the major brands in Romania?
  • What potential exists for multinational vs. local soft drinks companies looking to increase market share?
  • How have changing social attitudes affected soft drink sales?
  • How have sustainability issues; such as environmentally-friendly packaging, legislation on recyclability, or the amount of plastic in bottles, affected the soft drink industry?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Soft Drinks market research database.

Sample Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Decline of soft drinks in 2010

Romania witnessed a poor performance by soft drinks in 2010, resulting not only from the loss of consumer purchasing power but also the rapid turnaround by Romanians from being the most optimistic in 2008 to the most pessimistic in 2010 within the EU; consequently this left a loss of confidence in the near future and thus a negative impact on the purchase of soft drinks. The painful steps taken for the reduction of all the salaries in the budgetary system and growth of VAT by five percentage points in 2010 also had an important effect on the purchasing power and the performance of soft drinks as a whole.

Poor performance driven by the economic recession

The economic recession was the main responsible for decline in sales of soft drinks in 2010. Reduction of incomes came naturally as result of the austerity measures taken by the Government in order to reduce the deficit, with impact on the incomes of employees in the public system as well as in the private companies, both categories having to cope with higher taxes and a changing attitude towards consumption at the expense of saving and caution regarding the future. As a consequence, the main trend of 2010 was the switch from more expensive fruit/vegetable juice and carbonates to cheaper bottled water as well as a big reduction of on-trade sales.

Multinationals retain leadership in 2010

Coca-Cola HBC Romania SRL maintained its leading position in 2010, followed by Quadrant-Amroq Beverages. However, many of the strong domestic manufacturers retained good positions in soft drinks as a consequence of their intense activity in mainly bottled water. Romaqua Group SA and European Drinks SA were the main competitors to multinationals. In fact, the top four leading manufacturers together accounted for almost three-quarters of total soft drinks off-trade volume sales in 2010. The reduction of purchasing power as well as the increasing demand for quality at affordable prices is expected to lead to more intense competition between multinationals and domestic producers.

Distribution marked by the expansion of multinational retailers

Although reducing expansion rates due to the financial crisis, large retailers continued to attract consumers in large and medium-sized cities but the number of visits reduced as well as the value of the purchased basket. Discounters were clearly the winning distribution channel and increased their off-trade sales share in 2010 due to the low prices despite the smaller brand range. On the other hand, traditional small grocery retailers continued to be the dominant channel in 2010 due to its strong penetration in the majority of cities and in rural areas where large chains are absent. In these areas, small grocery retailers dominate and there is little chance that this channel would lose overall supremacy over the forecast period.

Slow growth forecast under the impact of anti-crisis measures

The reduction of consumer purchasing power is the main consequence of the economic downturn, resulting in the continued slow growth of soft drinks over the forecast period. A growing number of Romanians lost confidence in the anti-crisis actions of the Government and think that the economy will continue to lose pace. The effect of the crisis will be seen until the end of the forecast period, when Romanians hope to enjoy higher incomes that could drive greater consumption of healthy soft drinks. Until then, pessimism characterises the Romanians’ attitude towards growing consumption of soft drinks.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Soft Drinks in Romania - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Decline of soft drinks in 2010

Poor performance driven by the economic recession

Multinationals retain leadership in 2010

Distribution marked by the expansion of multinational retailers

Slow growth forecast under the impact of anti-crisis measures

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Recession affects purchasing power of the population

Large retailers continue to attract consumers

Romanians keep an eye on healthy soft drinks

Sales in rural areas have potential

New product launches under the impact of the crisis

MARKET DATA

  • Table 1 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 2 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 3 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 4 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 5 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010
  • Table 6 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume 2010
  • Table 7 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010
  • Table 8 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value 2010
  • Table 9 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 10 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 11 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 12 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 13 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 14 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 15 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 16 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 17 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2006-2010
  • Table 18 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2007-2010
  • Table 19 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category and Distribution Format: % Analysis 2010
  • Table 20 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 21 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 22 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 23 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 24 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 25 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 26 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 27 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

APPENDIX

FOUNTAIN SALES in Romania

DATA

  • Table 28 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 29 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 30 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 31 Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 32 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 33 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Soft Drinks: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 34 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 35 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Fountain Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2010-2015

DEFINITIONS

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Soft Drinks in Romania - Company Profiles

Bilbor Mineral Water Srl in Soft Drinks (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 4 Bilbor Mineral Water SRL: Competitive Position 2010

Carpathian Springs SA in Soft Drinks (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 7 Carpathian Springs SA: Competitive Position 2010

European Drinks SA in Soft Drinks (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 10 European Drinks SA: Competitive Position 2010

La Fantana SRL in Soft Drinks (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 13 La Fantana SRL: Competitive Position 2010

Romaqua Group SA in Soft Drinks (Romania)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 16 Romaqua Group SA: Competitive Position 2010

Bottled Water in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The modest growth of bottled water in 2010 was the result of the economic downturn, impacting on disposable incomes. As a consequence, the growth potential of the rural area lost strength as well water was considered as natural and was free, which led to diminished intention by rural inhabitants to replace well water and tap water with bottled water. On the other hand, the small growth in the conditions of the recession was determined by the perception that tap water in Bucharest and other large cities is poor and less by the therapeutic effects of natural mineral water. The efforts made by manufacturers in terms of advertising and distribution led to a small volume increase despite the severe economic recession.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Bottled water in Romania is dominated by domestic manufacturers, most of which have been active for decades. Romaqua Group SA with Borsec retained an undisputed leadership in 2010, explained by the tradition and perception of Borsec as a pure natural mineral water; the “Queen of Mineral Water”. In Romania, the name Borsec was once the generic term for carbonated mineral water. Borsec is also the oldest brand in mineral water, with a history since 1806, which has a strong impact on consumers who appreciate the quality and the recognition for more than two centuries. The fact that Borsec is sustained by campaigns focused on energy provided for intense physical activities also represented strong support for its leading position.

PROSPECTS

  • Modest growth rates are expected for bottled water over the forecast period. The perception of bottled water as a healthy product in comparison to tap water will contribute to the forecast performance. Expected recovery of incomes at the end of the forecast period would allow consumers to spend more on bottled water, especially in cities while rural areas will continue to value traditionally better quality water due to natural springs and local water sources.

CATEGORY DATA

Institutional Bottled Water Sales

  • Table 36 Sales of Bottled Water to Institutional Channel 2005-2010
  • Table 37 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 38 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 39 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 40 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 41 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 42 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 43 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 44 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 45 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 46 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 47 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 48 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Carbonates in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The volume decline of carbonates in 2010 was the consequence of the recession, negatively impacting consumers’ purchasing power. Despite a change in lifestyle in the latter part of the review period, consumers affected by the austerity measures taken in 2010 remained loyal to carbonates as providing a lower unit price compared to perceived healthier soft drinks. The efforts made by manufacturers in terms of promotions, advertising and distribution led to a small volume reduction compared to the deep negative effects of the recession within most of the income categories of the population.

COMPETITIVE LAMBSCAPE

PROSPECTS

  • Over the forecast period, carbonates will be negatively affected not just by diminished purchasing power but also by consumer concerns about health and diet. These will favour non-carbonated soft drinks perceived as more natural than carbonates, including fruit/vegetable juice, RTD tea and bottled water. The elimination of preservatives from most fruit/vegetable juice will represent a strong reason for more educated consumers to reduce, or even eliminate, carbonates from their diet. However, consumption will remain high within lower-income households, which will continue to perceive carbonates as providing satisfaction at lower unit prices.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 49 Low Calorie Carbonates by Subsector
  • Table 50 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 51 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 52 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 53 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 54 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 55 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 56 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 57 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 58 Off-trade Sales of Low Calorie Cola Carbonates by Category: % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 59 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 60 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 61 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 62 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 63 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 64 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 65 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 66 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Concentrates in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The decline of concentrates in 2010 was mainly the result of the loss of purchasing power due to the negative effects of the crisis. The crisis led to the increasing consumption of homemade liquid concentrates, a longstanding tradition in the country which lost some popularity during the boom period between 2006 and 2008. The return to homemade concentrates was the consequence of lower incomes but also the perception of such products as fully natural, with no additives. Homemade concentrates retained an important consumption habit in rural areas, where production of fruits and berries is a common occupation. In conditions where the costs for own production are low, manufactured concentrates continue to be perceived as expensive and less natural than homemade products. The countryside production is also a source for consumers in small cities as well as in large cities, who are in search of natural products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • After the withdrawal of many regional brands, inexpensive but better-quality liquid concentrates showed an increasing trend towards manufacturers’ concentration. Laurul SA with its brand Laurul was the best performer in 2010. It accounted for the leading position, as a result of extensive availability in all retail channels. Ranked second was Fares Drinks SRL which placed much effort into quality improvement of its products and enhanced their perception as natural. Most products listed under ‘others’ are now represented by private label as well as imported brands found on the shelves of hypermarkets. Many small regional producers, with a focus on low-income consumers and distribution generally limited to neighbouring areas, discontinued production or became manufacturers of private label.

PROSPECTS

  • Concentrates is expected to register negative growth in both off-trade volume and constant value terms over the forecast period. The effect of the crisis will be the main determinant for the poor performance, with low-income consumers preferring the cheap carbonates. Quality and expensive concentrates remained the privilege of higher-income consumers, in search of more sophisticated flavours. Homemade liquid concentrates will continue to be a traditional product in the rural area and will thus limit here the presence of manufactured products.

CATEGORY DATA

Concentrates Conversions

  • Table 67 Concentrates Conversion Factors for Ready-to-Drink (RTD) Format
  • Table 68 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 69 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 70 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 71 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 72 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 73 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 74 Company Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 75 Brand Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 76 Company Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 77 Brand Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 78 Company Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 79 Brand Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 80 Company Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 81 Brand Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 82 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 83 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 84 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 85 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 86 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 87 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The decline of total volume sales in 2010 was largely a consequence of the loss of purchasing power after the application of the austerity measures taken for reducing the public deficit. The decrease of consumers’ purchasing power could not compensate the changes in lifestyle during the booming period 2006-2008, when consumers began to see the value behind natural products and healthier food products in general. The elimination of preservatives in fruit/vegetable juice was well received by consumers as the lack of preservatives was perceived as the main feature that defines the “natural” concept. Fruit/vegetable juice was better represented than carbonates by low calorie versions.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Coca-Cola HBC Romania SRL and Quadrant-Amroq Beverages SA (PepsiCo) led head-to-head fruit/vegetable juice in 2010, followed just behind by Romaqua Romania SRL. Their brands were present across the whole category, whether in cartons, plastic bottles or glass bottles. They also benefited from investment in advertising, promotions and distribution and from consumer interest for healthy soft drinks, without preservatives and sugar in many cases, which were mostly associated with a natural product.

PROSPECTS

  • Total volume sales are expected to stagnate over the forecast period while constant value sales will diminish, due to the negative effects of the crisis. The accentuated trend during the last few years of the review period towards increased consumption of healthier and natural products is expected to continue over the forecast period but it is strongly attenuated by the reduction in consumers’ purchasing power as a main consequence of the crisis and the austerity measures. As the recession in Romania is not expected to subside before the end of 2011, the growth rates of fruit/vegetable juice are expected to recover by the end of the forecast period as soon as purchasing power shows returns. However, the growth is sustained by the changes in lifestyle during the latter part of the review period, and which will continue to show positive effects, especially in Bucharest and other large cities.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 88 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 89 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 90 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 91 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 92 Leading Flavours for 100% Juice: % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 93 Leading Flavours for Nectars (25-99% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 94 Leading Flavours for Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 95 Leading Flavours for Fruit-flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content): % Volume Breakdown 2005-2010
  • Table 96 % Share of Smoothies in 100% Juice and Nectars (25-99% Juice): Off-trade Value 2010
  • Table 97 Chilled Vs Ambient Reconstituted 100% Juice: % Analysis 2005-2010
  • Table 98 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 99 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 100 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 101 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 102 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 103 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 104 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 105 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

RTD Coffee in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of RTD coffee remained extremely low, with its presence limited to the shelves of supermarkets/hypermarkets and petrol stations. The diminished purchasing power in 2010 could not drive a higher awareness thus sales suffered a consistent decline despite the low starting base.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Illy from Coca-Cola continued to retain its leading position within brands in 2010 due to the lower price and expanded availability in supermarkets/hypermarkets. Nestlé Romania was the irrefutable leader in 2007 with Nescafé Xpress but its share diminished constantly until 2009 when Illy proved to be more dynamic. In fact, Nescafé Xpress can be considered as the promoter of RTD coffee in Romania but the advertising campaigns that sustained the launch of Nescafé Xpress sustained the emergence not only of a brand but also of a concept and helped the entry and penetration of other brands.

PROSPECTS

  • As soon as the Romanian economy emerges from of the financial crisis, it is expected that consumer purchasing power will begin to improve. However, the recovery of purchasing power will be slower than the economic growth. Consequently, RTD coffee will continue to decline over the forecast period especially as Romanians are traditionalists in terms of coffee consumption. Most of them prefer to sit and chat in front of a hot coffee or to purchase hot coffee from petrol stations while out driving.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 106 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 107 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Value 2007-2010
  • Table 108 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Volume Growth 2007-2010
  • Table 109 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Value Growth 2007-2010
  • Table 110 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 111 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 112 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 113 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 114 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 115 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 116 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 117 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Value Growth 2010-2015

RTD Tea in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Emerging during the review period, RTD tea took advantage of its perception as being fashionable and upmarket, and enjoyed affiliation with the developing trend for consumption of natural and healthy products, which generally include non-carbonated soft drinks. The health attributes such as antioxidants, especially for green tea, also contributed to its success. However, this trend was noticeable only in Bucharest and other large cities, where higher consumer purchasing power contributed to increasing preference for soft drinks with functional value. For the rest of the country, where incomes are comparatively lower, RTD tea retained the perception of a sophisticated soft drink.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Coca-Cola HBC Romania and Quadrant-Amroq Beverages accounted for a combined 90% off-trade volume share, resulting from the agreements on an international level between Nestlé SA and The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo Inc and Unilever Group regarding bottling and distribution of Nestea and Lipton Ice Tea respectively. It can be said that these two movements had a significant impact on the development of RTD tea during the review period because the international agreements were transferred also to the local bottlers Coca-Cola HBC Romania and Quadrant-Amroq Beverages. The local bottling and thus the affordable unit prices, the extended distribution networks creating strong availability and the new launches led to the indisputable leadership of the two companies in 2010, with a minor share difference in favour of Coca-Cola HBC Romania due to its better representation across the whole soft drinks.

PROSPECTS

  • RTD tea is expected to register modest volume and value growth rates over the forecast period, explained the effects of the crisis but also by the limited consumption base, with rural areas practically accounting for a negligible share. However, RTD tea will benefit both from the penetration of Lipton and Nestea and the expected presence of other international brands. The expected recovery of consumer purchasing power after the economy starts to recover will sustain volume growth, following the continuing trend towards increasing demand for non-carbonated soft drinks. RTD tea will continue to be perceived as being important for defining a fashionable lifestyle.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 118 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 119 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 120 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 121 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 122 Leading Flavours for RTD Tea: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2010
  • Table 123 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 124 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 125 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 126 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 127 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 128 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 129 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 130 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Sports and Energy Drinks in Romania - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • The modest but positive performance of sports and energy drinks in 2010 was the result of changes in lifestyle in Bucharest and other large cities, whose inhabitants enjoyed higher incomes. However, the growth in the adverse conditions of the crisis was somewhat distorted by the low starting base, as well as by the fact that energy drinks mainly counted in the development of the category as a whole despite the emergence and acceptance of sports drinks in the latter part of the review period. Furthermore, energy drinks witnessed strong penetration in on-trade outlets historically, which resulted in reduced seasonality. The reduced seasonality was also the consequence of consumption occasions, with a focus on the refreshing and energising effects of the products.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Red Bull was the first important energy drink to enter Romania and maintained its supremacy during the review period and 2010. The fact that Red Bull Romania SRL is the only company to offer a low calorie version of its energy drink contributed considerably to its clear leadership of volume and value sales. The brand accounts by far for the biggest volume share in the on-trade channel due to its very aggressive penetration strategy and heavy advertising campaigns. Red Bull is followed far behind by Burn, Rienergy, Red Force, Power Horse, Gatorade, Powerade and many other brands.

PROSPECTS

  • The small total volume growth estimated for the forecast period will be due to the result of the crisis and the slow economic recovery followed by an even slower improvement of consumers’ purchasing power in the short-term. However, changes in lifestyle, especially among young urban consumers, are expected over the forecast period. Energy drinks will continue to be perceived as fashionable and providing an energising effect, and thus the consumption pattern will mainly follow the need for energy on impulse. The fact that this segment gained an important place on the shelves of large retailers had the effect of changing the perception of the products from sophisticated to more common.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 131 Still vs Carbonated Sports and energy drinks % Off-trade Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 132 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2005-2010
  • Table 133 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2005-2010
  • Table 134 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 135 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2005-2010
  • Table 136 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2006-2010
  • Table 137 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2007-2010
  • Table 138 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2006-2010
  • Table 139 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2007-2010
  • Table 140 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2010-2015
  • Table 141 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2010-2015
  • Table 142 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2010-2015
  • Table 143 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2010-2015

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Soft Drinks
    • Bottled Water
      • Carbonated Bottled Water
      • Flavoured Bottled Water
      • Functional Bottled Water
      • Still Bottled Water
    • Carbonates
      • Cola Carbonates
        • Regular Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Regular Cola
          • Speciality Regular Cola
        • Low Calorie Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Low Calorie Cola
          • Speciality Low Calorie Cola
      • Non-Cola Carbonates
        • Lemonade/Lime
          • Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
          • Non Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
        • Mixers
          • Ginger Ale
          • Seltzer
          • Tonic Water
          • Other Mixers
        • Orange Carbonates
          • Juice-based Orange Carbonates
          • Non Juice-based Orange Carbonates
        • Other Non-Cola Carbonates
    • Concentrates
      • Liquid Concentrates
      • Powder Concentrates
    • Fruit/Vegetable Juice
      • 100% Juice
        • Frozen 100% Juice
        • Not from Concentrate 100% Juice
        • Reconstituted 100% Juice
      • Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice)
        • Frozen Juice Drinks
        • Juice Drinks Excluding Asian
      • Fruit-Flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content)
      • Nectars (25-99% Juice)
        • Frozen Nectars
        • Unfrozen Nectars
    • RTD Coffee
    • RTD Tea
      • Still RTD Tea
        • Still RTD Tea Excluding Asian
      • Carbonated RTD Tea
    • Sports and Energy Drinks
      • Energy Drinks
      • Sports Drinks
    • Asian Speciality Drinks

    Statistics Included

    Statistics Included

    For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

    From Passport

    • Market sizes
    • Company shares
    • Brand shares
    • Distribution
    • Chilled v ambient juices
    • Flavours
    • Off-trade vs on-trade
    • Per cent share of smoothies
    • Pricing
    • Products by ingredient
    • Products by ingredient
    • Sports vs other functional bottled water

    Market size details:

    • Retail volume
    • Retail volume % growth
    • Retail volume per capita
    • Foodservice volume
    • Foodservice volume % growth
    • Foodservice volume per capita
    • Total volume
    • Total volume % growth
    • Total volume per capita
    • Retail value retail selling price % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price % growth
    • Total value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail rtd volume
    • Retail rtd volume % growth
    • Retail rtd volume per capita
    • Foodservice rtd volume
    • Foodservice rtd volume % growth
    • Foodservice rtd volume per capita
    • Total rtd volume
    • Total rtd volume % growth
    • Total rtd volume per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice per capita
    • Total fountain on-trade volume
    • Total fountain on-trade volume % growth
    • Total fountain on-trade volume per capita
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder real (constant 2008) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder nominal (current) prices per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY

    Methodology

    Methodology

    Global insight and local knowledge

    With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

    This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

    Industry specialists

    Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

    Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

    The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

    Country and regional analysts

    Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

    In-country research network

    To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

    Research Methodology

    Our research methods

    Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

    Desk research

    With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

    • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
    • National and international trade press
    • National and international trade associations
    • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
    • Company financials and annual reports
    • Broker reports
    • Online databases
    • The financial, business and mainstream press

    Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

    Store checks

    Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

    • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
    • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
    • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
    • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

    Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

    Trade survey

    Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

    Trade surveys allow us to:

    • Fill gaps in available published data per company
    • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
    • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
    • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

    In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

    Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

    Company analysis

    At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

    At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

    Forecasts

    Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

    Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

    Data validation

    All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

    The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

    Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

    Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

    Market analysis

    Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

    Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

    my pages

    Want to find out more about this report?

    RELATED

    Country Report

    Consumer Lifestyle

    Country Report

    Future Demographic