You are here: HomeSolutionsIndustriesSoft Drinks
print my pages

Country Report

Soft Drinks in the US

May 2012

Price: US$1,900

About this Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Some consumer behaviour changes forever

The severe economic downturn and well-publicised lawsuits and recalls of leading brands regarding their misleading claims and branding have led to consumer behaviour changes that might prevail for a long time to come. Private label products have gained a permanent spot in certain soft drinks categories where differentiation and brand loyalty is low, such as in juices, bottled water and concentrates. Consumers have retained their frugality in spending habits even though the US was declared out of the recession in 2010. More consumers are becoming smarter shoppers; reading labels carefully and being highly sceptical of overt health and functionality claims. It is a tough road ahead for soft drinks manufacturers to win back today’s wary consumer.

Increased federal scrutiny may change the way future products are promoted

In 2011, food and beverage manufacturers continued to adjust their marketing practices in accordance with the increase in federal government scrutiny. As more warnings are issued and more lawsuits are resolved in the courts, manufacturers are getting a better picture of what is allowed and what is not allowed in marketing health claims. Specific to the beverages industry, there are increasing investigations, enforcement and regulation by the FDA, USDA, and FTC, along with international, state and local governmental bodies. There are regulatory changes to mandatory food labelling and voluntary labelling statements face increased challenges. Categories such as those of Organic and Naturally Healthy (NH) beverages could benefit from their simpler products and relatively straightforward positioning. A product with fewer claims of fortification, functionality and value-add might actually be perceived as a less-processed and more-credible product by a consumer.

Soft drinks categories look to each other for innovation

The continued success of energy drinks in the beverage business has inspired other soft drinks and even health and wellness beverage categories. Unlike energy drinks that are often popular for their controversial image, other soft drinks categories have the potential to market the “energy” functionality in a more responsible manner. In 2011, leading organic beverages brand, Celestial Seasonings launched Kombucha Energy Shots, positioned as a fortified, all-natural shot by combining B vitamins and energising botanicals. More recently, in April 2012, Starbucks launched Starbucks Refreshers, a RTD coffee drink that uses unroasted, green coffee extract for the energy boost — but has no coffee taste.

Better-For-You (BFY) attributes dominated 2011 launches and extensions

The 2011 Federal Dietary Guidelines – released every five years by the US Department of Agriculture, in conjunction with the US Department of Health and Human Services – reflect concerns that the population is consuming too many calories and the myriad health problems that this can lead to. Additionally, First Lady Michelle Obama is personally pushing federal legislation to reduce the percentage of childhood obesity from 20% to 5% by 2030. One of the main goals is to reduce the amount of sugar in children’s diets. These concerns and efforts to influence consumers to embrace suggested changes can potentially benefit the BFY industry. Key claims in 2011 new launches and extensions include - lower-calorie, zero-calorie, stevia-sweetened (and thereby lower-calorie) and diet - across all soft drinks categories.

True innovation comes from niche brands, especially in health and wellness

Truly inspirational and innovative products seem to come from niche players which are ideally positioned to benefit from the current environment. The recent slew of lawsuits/recalls of leading brands regarding their misleading claims and positioning has created a wary and sceptical consumer. Niche player, Hint Inc, developed a NH premium essence water (unsweetened and no calories) in response to a growing wall of sugary juices and carbonates. Simple packaging and clean labelling contributed to its overwhelming success. Similarly, Honest Tea, a premium RTD tea from a small player, is one of the only brands in the US to be USDA certified organic and is better positioned than most to take advantage of the consumer desire for authenticity behind the health positioning of brands in the category. Coca-Cola saw the opportunity and purchased Honest Tea in 2011.


Samples (FAQs about samples):

doc_pdf.png Sample Soft Drinks Market Research Report

doc_excel_table.png Sample Soft Drinks Data

Delivery: Files are delivered directly into your account within a few minutes of purchase.

Overview

Discover the latest market trends and uncover sources of future market growth for the Soft Drinks industry in USA with research from Euromonitor's team of in-country analysts.

Find hidden opportunities in the most current research data available, understand competitive threats with our detailed market analysis, and plan your corporate strategy with our expert qualitative analysis and growth projections.

If you're in the Soft Drinks industry in USA, our research will save you time and money while empowering you to make informed, profitable decisions.

When you purchase this report, you also get the data and the content from these category reports in USA for free:

The Soft Drinks in USA market research report includes:

  • Analysis of key supply-side and demand trends
  • Detailed segmentation of international and local products
  • Historic volumes and values, company and brand market shares
  • Five year forecasts of market trends and market growth  
  • Robust and transparent market research methodology, conducted in-country

Our market research reports answer questions such as:

  • What is the market size of Soft Drinks in USA?
  • What are the major brands in USA?
  • What potential exists for multinational vs. local soft drinks companies looking to increase market share?
  • How have changing social attitudes affected soft drink sales?
  • How have sustainability issues; such as environmentally-friendly packaging, legislation on recyclability, or the amount of plastic in bottles, affected the soft drink industry?

Why buy this report?

  • Gain competitive intelligence about market leaders
  • Track key industry trends, opportunities and threats
  • Inform your marketing, brand, strategy and market development, sales and supply functions

This industry report originates from Passport, our Soft Drinks market research database.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Soft Drinks in the US - Industry Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Some consumer behaviour changes forever

Increased federal scrutiny may change the way future products are promoted

Soft drinks categories look to each other for innovation

Better-For-You (BFY) attributes dominated 2011 launches and extensions

True innovation comes from niche brands, especially in health and wellness

KEY TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Increased federal scrutiny may change future product positioning trends

Some premium products survive through recession

Health and wellness trend offers opportunities in children’s soft drinks

Better-For-You (BFY) attributes dominated 2011 launches and extensions

Winning back the wary consumer is a tough road ahead

MARKET DATA

  • Table 1 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 2 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 3 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 4 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 5 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2011
  • Table 6 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume 2011
  • Table 7 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2011
  • Table 8 Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value 2011
  • Table 9 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 10 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 11 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 12 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 13 Company Shares of Soft Drinks (RTD) by Total Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 14 Brand Shares of Soft Drinks (RTD) by Total Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 15 Company Shares of On-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 16 Brand Shares of On-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 17 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 18 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (as sold) by Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 19 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 20 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks (RTD) by Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 21 Company Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2007-2011
  • Table 22 Brand Shares of Off-trade Soft Drinks by Value 2008-2011
  • Table 23 Penetration of Private Label (as sold) by Category by Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 24 Penetration of Private Label by Category by Value 2006-2011
  • Table 25 Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category and Distribution Format: % Analysis 2011
  • Table 26 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 27 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Channel: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 28 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 29 Forecast Off-trade vs On-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Channel: % Value Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 30 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 31 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 32 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 33 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Soft Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

APPENDIX

FOUNTAIN SALES in the US

DATA

  • Table 34 Sales of Soft Drinks by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 35 Sales of Soft Drinks by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 36 Sales of Carbonates by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 37 Sales of Carbonates by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 38 Forecast Sales of Soft Drinks by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 39 Forecast Sales of Soft Drinks by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 40 Forecast Sales of Carbonates by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 41 Forecast Sales of Carbonates by Fountain On-trade through C-Store vs Other Fountain On-trade: % Volume Growth 2011-2016

DEFINITIONS

  • Summary 1 Research Sources

Soft Drinks in the US - Company Profiles

Bolthouse Farms in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 3 Bolthouse Farms: Competitive Position 2011

Coca-Cola Co, The in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 6 The Coca-Cola Co: Competitive Position 2011

Crystal Geyser Roxane Water Co LLC in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 8 Crystal Geyser Roxane Water Co LLC: Competitive Position 2011

Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

  • Summary 11 Dr Pepper Snapple Group: Production Statistics

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 12 Dr Pepper Snapple Group: Competitive Position 2011

Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons Inc in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 14 Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons: Competitive Position 2011

Nestlé Waters North America in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 16 Nestlé Waters North America: Competitive Position 2011

PepsiCo Inc in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

  • Summary 19 PepsiCo Inc: Production Statistics 2011

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 20 PepsiCo Inc: Competitive Position 2011

POM Wonderful LLC in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 22 POM Wonderful LLC: Competitive Position 2011

Red Bull North America Inc in Soft Drinks (USA)

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

KEY FACTS

COMPANY BACKGROUND

PRODUCTION

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING

  • Summary 24 Red Bull North America Inc: Competitive Position 2011

Bottled Water in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Functional bottled water suffered a decline of 4% in off-trade value sales in 2011; a continued sharp decline from the CAGR of 13% over the review period. The leading brand in functional bottled water, VitaminWater, is being sued for having a misleading name. When belts were being tightened during the recession years, consumers began to scrutinise the ingredients and label claims of functional waters with renewed scepticism. Clearly communicating the functionality of the product and the authenticity behind it is vital to ensure future volume sales. As such, the continued scrutiny on sugar and calories in VitaminWater led to an off-trade value sales decline of 6% in 2011.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • In 2011, the combined total of all private label products held a 22% off-trade value and a 29% off-trade volume share of bottled water. Nestlé Waters America led all branded products with a 22% off-trade value and a 24% off-trade volume share of bottled water. The company’s focus on regional brands, by limiting its focus for particular brands to particular regions, insulates it from losses in any one brand at a time. The marketing of these regional brands emphasises the fact that water is naturally healthy with phrases such as “Water – life’s original ingredient”. Regional brands also benefit from causal alignment like the promotion of a social cause relevant to the region and community. There is also increased focus on the heritage or the source of water, especially for premium brands. Nestlé Pure Life, which has national distribution, has benefited from consumers trading down because it is available at a low price point and consumers trust the Nestlé company name behind it as opposed to a private label product. Nestlé Pure Life has grown to hold an off-trade volume share of 7% in 2011.

PROSPECTS

  • As the negative campaigns against bottled water continue to affect the industry, bottled water sales over the forecast period are projected to make modest gains. Total bottled water volume sales are expected to increase by just 3% while the total value sales are expected to go up by 9% in constant terms over the forecast period. The expected recovery in functional water and high CAGR predicted for carbonated water might help boost volumes while shipping and logistics costs are expected to further increase unit prices and value sales of bottled water.

CATEGORY DATA

Institutional Bottled Water Sales

  • Table 42 Sales of Bottled Water to Institutional Channels 2006-2011
  • Table 43 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 44 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 45 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 46 Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 47 Leading Flavours for Flavoured Bottled Water: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 48 Leading Flavours for Functional Bottled Water: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 49 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 50 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 51 Company Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 52 Brand Shares of Bottled Water by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 53 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 54 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 55 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 56 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Bottled Water: % Value Growth 2011-2016

Carbonates in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Health and wellness is a growing factor in consumer purchasing decisions as two-thirds of Americans are either overweight or obese. Obesity is a growing danger in the US and there has been an attempt to prevent it from a younger age. The launch of First Lady Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move campaign in 2010 is one such program that targets stopping obesity through building healthy habits. One of the strategies to combat childhood obesity is to eat healthy and reduce the amount of sugar and calories. As such, families are recommended to drink less carbonated soft drinks and products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or sugar. Building an early habit amongst children to avoid carbonated soft drinks at an early age may grow to affect sales in the future.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Coca-Cola Co dominates carbonates sales in the US with a 43% share of total volume. In 2011, total volume growth of Coca-Cola brands remained flat, posting 22.9 billion litres in sales. The flat volume movement is looked to as a positive for the company has it had been in decline for nine consecutive years beforehand. Coca-Cola has a long-standing contract with the largest fast-food restaurant, McDonald’s, to provide beverages for its restaurants, which gives the company a significant advantage in on-trade sales. However, in April 2009, the Dr Pepper Snapple Group announced a multi-year agreement with McDonald’s that will expand availability of Dr Pepper and Diet Dr Pepper in its US restaurants while cutting into Coca-Cola fountain sales. The company also engages in innovation to energise its loyal consumer base. Its new Coke Freestyle Machine has been followed with positive reviews and greater spending receipts. In December 2011, Burger King joined Noodles and Company, Five Guys Burgers and Fries and other restaurants in rolling out the new vending machines in their fast food locations.

PROSPECTS

  • As Americans are expected to maintain their health focus and avoid products that they consider detrimental to their health total volume sales of carbonates are projected to decline by 1% over the forecast period, falling to 52.4 billion litres. The long-term forecast for carbonates remains bleak as consumers are becoming more educated in terms of what they eat and drink. As such, many are eschewing high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and artificial sweeteners that are common in carbonates. Major manufacturers, such as PepsiCo, have acknowledged this and are focusing their spending on innovation towards growing their non-carbonate portfolio. These types of products better encapsulate the health and wellness positioning and “natural” labelling that is favoured by Americans.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 57 Low Calorie Carbonates by Category
  • Table 58 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 59 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 60 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 61 Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 62 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 63 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 64 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 65 On-trade vs Off-trade Sales of Carbonates: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 66 Off-trade Sales of Low Calorie Cola Carbonates by Category: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 67 Leading Flavours for Cola Carbonates: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 68 Leading Flavours for Non-cola Carbonates: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 69 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 70 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 71 Company Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 72 Brand Shares of Carbonates by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 73 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 74 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 75 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 76 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Carbonates by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

Concentrates in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sales of concentrates continued to grow in 2011, with total value increasing by 1% and total RTD volume sales increasing by 5%. In the context of the review period growth, the growth in 2011 is considerably slower in both volume and value terms. This might be attributed to the growing health and wellness awareness as well as the threat of childhood obesity. Many of these include powder forms of juice drinks primarily consumed by children, such as Kool-Aid and Tang. Demand for these types of powder concentrates has been somewhat limited by the large quantities of sugar mixed with them, as parents seek out healthier beverages to give their children.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Kraft Foods led concentrates sales in 2011 with a 36% share of off-trade RTD volume sales. This marked a two-percentage point decline of company shares from 2010, and a fifth year of continual decline for the company. In 2011, its two main brands, Kool-Aid and Crystal Light, combined for 33% of off-trade volume sales as the number one and number two selling brands, respectively. Crystal Light suffered from having its “diet” claims being challenged and other fitness water products entering the market. Also, many other manufacturers are using the single-serve packaging that Crystal Light had, thus drawing away one of its prime points of differentiation. Similar to its off-trade volume share rank, Kraft Foods led with a dominant 63% value share, however, the value share declined by 1% in 2011, and a fifth year of continual decline for the company.

PROSPECTS

  • Continued growth is projected at 9% in constant value terms over the forecast period to reach US$1.5 billion; total RTD volume sales are expected to increase by 4% over the forecast period, to reach 5.1 billion litres. Consumer demand for healthier drinks such as green teas as well as functional products with added vitamins, minerals or electrolytes, should drive further demand for powder concentrates as well, while traditionally high-sugar brands targeting children will lose their appeal.

CATEGORY DATA

Concentrates Conversions

  • Table 77 Concentrates Conversion Factors for Ready-to-Drink (RTD) Format
  • Table 78 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 79 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 80 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 81 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 82 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 83 Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 84 Leading Flavours for Liquid Concentrates: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 85 Leading Flavours for Powder Concentrates: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 86 Company Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 87 Brand Shares of Liquid Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 88 Company Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 89 Brand Shares of Powder Concentrates (as sold) by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 90 Company Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 91 Brand Shares of Concentrates (RTD) by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 92 Company Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 93 Brand Shares of Concentrates by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 94 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 95 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (as sold) by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 96 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 97 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates (RTD) by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 98 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 99 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Concentrates by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

Fruit/Vegetable Juice in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • In 2011, volume sales of fruit/vegetable juice declined by 2%; a fourth consecutive year of decline. Bad orange crops due to freezing weather conditions in Florida can be blamed for some of this decline but manufacturers will typically supplement their juice supply with Brazilian imports. The key culprit of the decline of juice consumption is the focus on US health and wellness. Due to this focus, more consumers have begun to read the labels of the products they purchase; What they find is that 100% juice has a high content of sugar (read: calories) and thereby not as appealing or “healthy.” Adding to the decline of juices is First Lady Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move campaign to reduce childhood obesity. One of the tenets is to lower the intake of sugar and calories by children which detracts from the consumption of 100% orange juice.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Coca-Cola Co is the leading fruit/vegetable juice manufacturer with a 20% total volume share through its Minute Maid, Simply, and Odwalla brands. Coca-Cola has strategically positioned its similar juice products to attract different types of consumers. The Minute Maid brand is positioned to attract the general consumer, often being fortified with functional ingredients such as plant sterols for joint and heart health. Odwalla is its super-premium brand positioned to attract consumers who are concerned with both the environment and wellbeing. Its products are branded as earth-friendly and its smoothies use only naturally-healthy products, thus enabling it to charge a premium for them. The Simply brand is positioned for consumers who prefer fruit juice with no additives. Unfortunately, consumers in the US are focused on calories which were a detriment to the company’s sales. For the first time in five years, overall volume sales for Coca-Cola declined by 5%, falling to 2.3 billion litres in 2011. The company is aggressively repositioning itself with the launch of several new lower calorie fruit juices.

PROSPECTS

  • Fruit/vegetable juice sales are projected to decline by 1% over the forecast period, with total volume sales falling to 11.3 billion litres. High-sugar 100% juices will continue to decline as consumers move towards lower calories and functional drinks. Stevia-sweetened nectars will help offset some of the decline, providing consumers with a naturally-sweetened juice product with fewer calories and less sugar than 100% juices. Meanwhile, juice drinks remain a popular product for convenience store purchases as parents see it as a better alternative than carbonated soda for their children to drink.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 100 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 101 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 102 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 103 Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 104 Leading Flavours for 100% Juice: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 105 Leading Flavours for Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 106 Leading Flavours for Nectars (25-99% Juice): % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 107 Leading Flavours for Fruit-flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content): % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 108 % Share of Smoothies in 100% Juice and Nectars (25-99% Juice): Off-trade Value 2010
  • Table 109 Chilled Vs Ambient Reconstituted 100% Juice: % Volume Analysis 2006-2011
  • Table 110 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 111 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 112 Company Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 113 Brand Shares of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 114 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 115 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 116 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 117 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Fruit/Vegetable Juice by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

RTD Coffee in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • RTD coffee remains a highly specialised product that has gained momentum in only a handful of global markets. As a premium priced, indulgent drink with distribution primarily in developed markets such as the US, RTD coffee was particularly vulnerable to the consumer shift in spending that occurred during the recent economic downturn. Although the total volume grew by 6% during 2007-2009, total value dropped by 2%. Since new entrants in the RTD coffee category often struggle to gain entry into national chained stores, brands for the most part have not been able to take advantage of the current environment of frugality to compete on price.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The North American Coffee Partnership, a joint venture set up by Starbucks and PepsiCo, continues to hold a commanding lead in RTD coffee sales, and has increased its off-trade value share from 83% in 2010 to 86% in 2011. The company’s Frappuccino was the first mover in RTD coffee, with a flavour approximating to the popular Starbucks blended drink of the same name. The brand also has a large advantage in terms of distribution from its first mover status, and new entrants often struggle to gain entry into national chained stores. However, The Starbucks Corp has been challenged by a sharp decline in its signature iced Frappuccino franchise in recent years. To combat the issue, it has taken several measures, including introducing more varieties of the bottled version (sold under license by PepsiCo). The brand’s off-trade volume share picked up during the latter part of the review period and increased by nearly 2% in 2011.

PROSPECTS

  • As consumers are becoming increasingly concerned with health and wellness, the forecast for RTD coffee beverages is much lower than historical growth in the review period. In fact, total value is expected to remain stagnant and volume is expected to decline by 3% over the forecast period, compared to respective growth rates of 24% and 27% over the review period. Although many consumers will avoid RTD coffees as they lack nutritional value or additional health properties, it will still maintain a niche market as a caffeinated indulgent beverage choice for adults.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 118 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 119 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 120 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 121 Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 122 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 123 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 124 Leading Flavours for RTD Coffee: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 125 Company Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 126 Brand Shares of RTD Coffee by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 127 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 128 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 129 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 130 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Coffee: % Value Growth 2011-2016

RTD Tea in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • In 2011, RTD tea sales remained healthy in the US, growing by 7% in total value and 8% in total volume terms. Health-oriented consumers are choosing RTD tea over other soft drinks, such as cola carbonates, due to its natural health properties, like antioxidants. An additional appeal to health-conscious consumers is that unsweetened RTD teas typically have no calories. Total volume and value sales of RTD tea continued to grow, albeit slowly with single-digit growth in 2011, in comparison to the double-digit growth of review period, due to the still-lingering effects of the economic downturn. The slowdown might also be attributed to the category maturing in the US. Nevertheless, a slight decline in private label off-trade volume share and a stagnant private label off-trade value share might be an indicator of the slow turnaround of the economy as some consumers return to higher quality and premium RTD teas.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • In 2011, Lipton continued to be the leader in RTD tea off-trade volume sales through a partnership between PepsiCo and Unilever. Lipton’s brand portfolio is available in most retail outlets, and it has a strong on-trade fountain presence as well, with at least one facing common on most Pepsi-branded fountain line-ups. In recent years, Lipton’s focus has revolved around higher quality and health and wellness/natural trends. Lipton renamed one of its lines “Lipton Pure Leaf” in 2007; a name that emphasises a higher-quality brewing process than its competitors. Newer green and white tea Lipton extensions carry an “AOX” seal on the packaging to highlight the healthy antioxidants inherent in the drinks. Lipton launched Green Tea Superfruits featuring exotic new flavours including Acai, Goji, Mangosteen in 2010. In 2011, Lipton also introduced 100% Natural Iced Tea with natural ingredients including tea, real sugar and natural flavours. Such moves have helped Lipton to make modest share gains. Its off-trade value share rose from 25% in 2004 to 28% in 2011.

PROSPECTS

  • RTD tea is expected to see continued growth over the forecast period, increasing by 24% in constant value terms and by 21% in total volume terms. This growth parallels the increase in health awareness among consumers in the US. As such, they are looking for alternatives to high-calorie carbonates and RTD teas offers a unique refreshment beverage with lots of natural health benefits but very few calories. Although RTD tea is becoming increasingly saturated, new flavours and varieties continue to be introduced. The primary source of growth in the category will come from antioxidant-rich green, white, and red teas combined with fruit flavours to maintain the natural positioning. Additionally, the return of kombucha teas to the market shelves will also help push the category’s growth. Kombucha’s touted health benefits, not to mention the beverage itself, are still relatively unknown to mainstream consumers. In 2011, leading organic beverages brand Celestial Seasonings launched Kombucha Energy Shots, a RTD tea positioned as a fortified, all-natural shot by combining B vitamins and energising botanicals. Also, the success of sparkling RTD teas may help the category grow by cutting into carbonates’ share. In April 2009, Lipton launched its first ever sparkling iced tea and further extended this line by launching a diet version of its sparkling green tea. This allowed consumers to have their “bubbles”, but in an iced tea form as well as with reduced calories.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 131 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 132 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 133 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 134 Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 135 Leading Flavours for RTD Tea: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 136 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 137 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 138 Company Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 139 Brand Shares of RTD Tea by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 140 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 141 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 142 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 143 Forecast Off-trade Sales of RTD Tea by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

Sports and Energy Drinks in the US - Category Analysis

HEADLINES

TRENDS

  • Sports and energy drinks, being at the premium end of soft drinks, was deeply impacted during the severe recession that resulted in slower or declining sales of even the most established mega brands in the beverages market as US consumers simply reduced their consumption of such beverages or have traded down to more economical options for quenching their thirst. The sports and energy drinks category continued to recover slowly as total volume grew by 12% in 2011, compared to a recessionary period decline of 7% during 2007-2009. The recessionary decline was slightly more pronounced in off-trade volume compared to on-trade volume as consumers tightened their budgets during store visits.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • The Gatorade Co continues to hold a commanding lead in sports and energy drink sales through the Gatorade sports drink range, with nearly 60% of off-trade volume share and 39% of off-trade value sales in 2011. Gatorade was the first major sports drink brand, and has maintained its lead through continuous product introductions, offering different flavours and formulations to appeal to different consumer groups. Gatorade rebranded its products from Gatorade to G in 2009, and the move initially confused some consumers, causing a decline in share. G2 brand’s off-trade value share remained stagnant in 2010 but the brand gained about a percent in 2011. With the repositioning efforts gaining traction coupled with an improving economy, the recently launched G2 improved in 2011. As sports and energy drinks are at the premium end of soft drinks, private label held a negligible share in terms of both off-trade volume and value.

PROSPECTS

  • Sports and energy drinks is expected to grow by 19% in total constant value terms over the forecast period; a considerable slowdown compared to a review period growth of 33%. Energy drinks has seemingly reached saturation point much quicker than expected. It appears to have a high level of penetration and there is little innovation, which makes it tougher to attract new consumers.

CATEGORY DATA

  • Table 144 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2006-2011
  • Table 145 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2006-2011
  • Table 146 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 147 Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2006-2011
  • Table 148 Leading Flavours for Sports and Energy Drinks: % Volume Breakdown 2006-2011
  • Table 149 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2007-2011
  • Table 150 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Volume 2008-2011
  • Table 151 Company Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2007-2011
  • Table 152 Brand Shares of Sports and Energy Drinks by Off-trade Value 2008-2011
  • Table 153 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Volume 2011-2016
  • Table 154 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: Value 2011-2016
  • Table 155 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Volume Growth 2011-2016
  • Table 156 Forecast Off-trade Sales of Sports and Energy Drinks by Category: % Value Growth 2011-2016

Segmentation

Segmentation

This market research report includes the following:

  • Soft Drinks
    • Bottled Water
      • Carbonated Bottled Water
      • Flavoured Bottled Water
      • Functional Bottled Water
      • Still Bottled Water
    • Carbonates
      • Cola Carbonates
        • Regular Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Regular Cola
          • Speciality Regular Cola
        • Low Calorie Cola Carbonates
          • Standard Low Calorie Cola
          • Speciality Low Calorie Cola
      • Non-Cola Carbonates
        • Lemonade/Lime
          • Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
          • Non Juice-based Lemonade/Lime
        • Mixers
          • Ginger Ale
          • Seltzer
          • Tonic Water
          • Other Mixers
        • Orange Carbonates
          • Juice-based Orange Carbonates
          • Non Juice-based Orange Carbonates
        • Other Non-Cola Carbonates
    • Concentrates
      • Liquid Concentrates
      • Powder Concentrates
    • Fruit/Vegetable Juice
      • 100% Juice
        • Frozen 100% Juice
        • Not from Concentrate 100% Juice
        • Reconstituted 100% Juice
      • Juice Drinks (up to 24% Juice)
        • Frozen Juice Drinks
        • Juice Drinks Excluding Asian
      • Fruit-Flavoured Drinks (No Juice Content)
      • Nectars (25-99% Juice)
        • Frozen Nectars
        • Unfrozen Nectars
    • RTD Coffee
    • RTD Tea
      • Still RTD Tea
        • Still RTD Tea Excluding Asian
      • Carbonated RTD Tea
    • Sports and Energy Drinks
      • Energy Drinks
      • Sports Drinks
    • Asian Speciality Drinks

    Statistics Included

    Statistics Included

    For each category and subcategory you will receive the following data in Excel format:

    From Passport

    • Market sizes
    • Company shares
    • Brand shares
    • Distribution
    • Chilled v ambient juices
    • Flavours
    • Off-trade vs on-trade
    • Per cent share of smoothies
    • Pricing
    • Products by ingredient
    • Products by ingredient
    • Sports vs other functional bottled water

    Market size details:

    • Retail volume
    • Retail volume % growth
    • Retail volume per capita
    • Foodservice volume
    • Foodservice volume % growth
    • Foodservice volume per capita
    • Total volume
    • Total volume % growth
    • Total volume per capita
    • Retail value retail selling price % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price % growth
    • Total value retail selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value retail selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Foodservice value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder % growth
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Total value manufacturer selling price excl powder per capita local currency, USD, EUR, GBP, CHF, JPY
    • Retail rtd volume
    • Retail rtd volume % growth
    • Retail rtd volume per capita
    • Foodservice rtd volume
    • Foodservice rtd volume % growth
    • Foodservice rtd volume per capita
    • Total rtd volume
    • Total rtd volume % growth
    • Total rtd volume per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through c-store per capita
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice % growth
    • Fountain on-trade volume through foodservice per capita
    • Total fountain on-trade volume
    • Total fountain on-trade volume % growth
    • Total fountain on-trade volume per capita

    Methodology

    Methodology

    Global insight and local knowledge

    With 40 years’ experience of developed and emerging markets, Euromonitor International’s research method is built on a unique combination of specialist industry knowledge and in-country research expertise.

    This approach is what enables us to achieve our goal of building a market consensus view of size, shape and trends across the full distribution universe of each category. We factor in whichever channels are relevant, from large-scale grocery to direct sellers, from discount stores to local mom-and-pop outlets.

    Industry specialists

    Each industry we cover is managed by an Industry Manager and team of Industry Analysts who research and report on their specialist categories all year round.

    Our collaborative approach to research means that these industry teams are in constant dialogue with industry players and opinion formers. The planning of our research programmes reflects latest market trends and industry events. In completing each update project, this provides invaluable input to the testing, review and finalisation of our data.

    The specialist in-house teams bring together findings from all stages of the annual research process. They work closely with in-country analysts, assess and challenge data and exercise final editorial control over the publication of new data and analysis.

    Country and regional analysts

    Our in-country analyst network is managed by country and regional analysts in our offices around the world. Working closely with each in-country team, the regional research management team ensures that all country researchers are well schooled in best practices, from the information collected in store checks, to the dialogue we build in trade surveys. Our country analysts ensure that national reports explain the data trends and provide clear insights into the local market’s dynamics.

    In-country research network

    To deliver fresh insights every year in countries all around the world, we believe the strongest approach is to use analysts on the ground. They bring fluency in local language, physical proximity to the best sources, an ability to engage directly with local industry contacts, and an awareness of how the products and services we study are advertised, sold and consumed. These are essential parts of our ability to report incisively on these markets.

    Research Methodology

    Our research methods

    Each Euromonitor International industry report is based on a core set of research techniques:

    Desk research

    With industry events, corporate activity, trends and new product introductions tracked year round by our industry team, desk research provides a starting point for the in-country research programme. Our in-country researchers will access the following sources:

    • National statistics offices governmental and official sources
    • National and international trade press
    • National and international trade associations
    • Industry study groups and other semi-official sources
    • Company financials and annual reports
    • Broker reports
    • Online databases
    • The financial, business and mainstream press

    Accessing sources is only the first step. The ability to interpret and reconcile often conflicting information across multiple sources is a key aspect of the added value we provide.

    Store checks

    Store checks are an integral part of our methods for product industries. Carried out on the ground across a relevant mix of channels, the information gained provides first-hand insights into the products we are researching, specifically:

    • Place: We track products in all relevant channels, selective and mass, store and non-store
    • Product: What are innovations in products, pack sizes and formats?
    • Price: What are brand price variations across channels, how do private label’s prices compare to those of branded goods?
    • Promotion: What are marketing and merchandising trends, offers, discounts and tie-ins?

    Findings are cross-referenced with brand share data analysis. The results, combined with the findings of desk research, provide a strong basis for identifying key areas of questioning to take forward into our trade survey.

    Trade survey

    Interaction with global players at corporate HQ and regional levels is complemented by unique local data and insights from our in-country trade surveys around the world. Through the high profile of the Euromonitor International brand, we are able to talk directly to a wide range of sources and therefore inform our analysis with the knowledge and opinions of the leading operators in the market.

    Trade surveys allow us to:

    • Fill gaps in available published data per company
    • Generate a consensus view of the size, structure and strategic direction of the category
    • Access year-in-progress data where published sources are out of date
    • Evaluate the experts’ views on current trends and market developments

    In building our composite industry view, we engage with a variety of personnel in key players at all points of the supply chain: materials suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and service operators. We also interview desk research sources: industry associations; study groups; and third party observers from the trade and financial press.

    Our objective is to engage in conversation with trade sources in which we exchange ideas and views on the industry, sharing our work-in-progress findings on supply/demand dynamics and potential. This dialogue enhances both parties’ understanding of the local market. The scope and reach of our trade survey also serves to eliminate bias (intentional and unintentional) from any single source.

    Company analysis

    At a global level, our company research combines our mix of industry interaction and use of secondary sources such as annual accounts, broker reports, financial press and databases. From a data perspective, the aim is to build “top-down” estimates of major players’ total global and regional sales.

    At a country level, in line with local reporting requirements, we access annual accounts, national-specific company databases and local company websites. These are all invaluable sources as we build a view of each domestic player’s size and position within very specific categories of the industry.

    Forecasts

    Data projections and future performance analysis are key elements of Euromonitor International’s market intelligence. Working with historic trends of 15 years or more, a key aspect of our trade survey is to engage industry insider views of the next five years. Will volumes maintain their historic trend? Will price increases or falls of recent years continue, accelerate or slow down? Will increasing demand for one product cannibalise sales of another?

    Forecasts represent many of the essential conclusions we have reached about the current state of the market, how it works and how it behaves under different macro and micro conditions. Our written analysis will state the assumptions and the trade opinion behind whether our predictions are optimistic or pessimistic, so that clients can use our statistical forecasts with confidence.

    Data validation

    All data is subjected to an exhaustive review process, at country, regional and global levels.

    The interpretation and review of sources and data inputs forms a central part of the collaboration between industry teams and country researchers. Numbers are delivered to regional and global offices with an audit trail of sources and calculations to allow for a thorough evaluation of data sense and integrity.

    Upon completion of the country review phase, data is then reviewed on a comparative basis at regional and then at a global level. Comparative checks are carried out on per capita consumption and spending levels, growth rates, patterns of category and subcategory breakdowns and distribution of sales by channel. Top-down estimates are reviewed against bottom-up regional and global market and company sales totals.

    Where marked differences are seen between proximate country markets or ones at similar developmental levels, supplementary research is conducted in the relevant countries to confirm and/or amend those findings. This process ensures international comparability across the database, that consistent category and subcategory definitions have been used and that all data has been correctly tested. We make sure that possible discrepancies between different published sources have been reconciled and that our interpretation of opinion and expectation from each country’s trade sources has been applied to form a coherent international pattern.

    Market analysis

    Another integral part of all our research programmes is that all Euromonitor International data is accompanied by clear written analysis. From a research perspective, this explains and substantiates data findings. From a client perspective, this offers unique insights into local consumption trends, routes to market, brand preferences, channel dynamics and future trends.

    Our country level analysis also provides invaluable input into the ability of our central industry specialist teams to marry local insights with strategic conclusions on the direction of the market regionally and globally.

    my pages

    Want to find out more about this report?

    If you purchase a report that is updated in the next 60 days, we will send you the new edition of the report and the data extract FREE!